微种植体支抗辅助内收上切牙后牙槽骨改建的锥形束CT研究

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2018.02.008

上海口腔医学 ›› 2018, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (2): 150-155.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2018.02.008

微种植体支抗辅助内收上切牙后牙槽骨改建的锥形束CT研究

陈香¹, 张向凤², 黄倩倩², 张翼², 喻凤², 王华桥¹

1.重庆医科大学附属口腔医院正畸科,口腔疾病与生物医学重庆市重点实验室, 重庆市高校市级口腔生物医学工程重点实验室,重庆 401147;
2.重庆市协尔口腔,重庆 400042

收稿日期:2017-05-08 修回日期:2017-07-05 出版日期:2018-04-25 发布日期:2018-05-14
通讯作者: 王华桥,E-mail：muscle_tina@163.com
作者简介:陈香（1992-）,女,硕士,E-mail：418634302@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（81570979）; 重庆市卫生局面上项目( 2013-2-069, 2012-2-131,2015MSXM051)

Evaluation of the changes of alveolar bone around the upper incisors after retraction with mini implant anchorage using cone-beam CT

CHEN Xiang¹, ZHANG Xiang-feng², HUANG Qian-qian², ZHANG Yi², YU Feng², WANG Hua-qiao¹

1.Department of Orthodontics,The Affiliated Hospital of Stomatology, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases and Biomedical Sciences,Chongqing Municipal Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedical Engineering of Higher Education. Chongqing 401147;
2.Chongqing Sharedental Clinic. Chongqing 400042, China

Received:2017-05-08 Revised:2017-07-05 Online:2018-04-25 Published:2018-05-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的:探索运用微种植体支抗结合高位牵引钩大量内收上颌切牙后牙槽骨的改建情况。方法:以22例青少年上颌前突拔牙矫治患者,上颌切牙内收前、内收完成后的锥形束CT（cone-beam CT,CBCT）为研究样本,应用Mimics 15.0行CBCT影像三维重建,明确上颌切牙移动方式,利用Invivo5.0三维定点测量唇、腭侧牙槽骨厚度和高度变化。采用SPSS19.0 软件包对测量数据进行配对t 检验。结果:上颌切牙切缘与根尖均发生水平舌侧移动,但切缘的移动距离大于根尖;切缘点发生向下移动,根尖点出现明显的向上移动。上切牙腭侧牙槽骨厚度及唇腭侧总厚度在根颈1/3和根中1/3均显著减小（P<0.05）,而根尖1/3显著增加（P<0.05）,腭侧牙槽骨高度显著降低（P<0.05）。结论:青少年上颌前突患者微种植体支抗结合高位牵引钩可以实现受控制的倾斜移动。大量内收上颌切牙后,其腭侧牙槽骨吸收远大于唇侧增生,牙槽骨并没有完全跟随牙的移动而改建,提示正畸矫治时不宜过度内收前牙。

关键词: 切牙内收, 微种植体支抗, 锥形束CT, 牙槽骨改建

Abstract: PURPOSE: The aim of this clinical study was to evaluate the changes of alveolar bone morphology before and after upper incisors retraction with mini implant anchorage using cone-beam CT (CBCT). METHODS: Twenty-two young patients with dentoalveolar maxillary protrusion and extraction of 2 maxillary first premolars were evaluated with CBCT. CBCT scans were obtained before treatment and 3 months after retraction of the incisors. The movement patterns of the upper incisors were assessed with Mimics15.0. The labial and palatal alveolar plates at crest level, midroot level, and apical level for bone-thickness changes and labial and palatal vertical bone level during retraction of the maxillary anterior segments were assessed with Invivo5.0. Paired t tests were used to evaluate the changes. RESULTS: The edge of the maxillary incisor and the root apex appeared lingual movement horizontally, but the moving distance was larger than the root apex. The edge of the incisors was moved downward, and the root apex was moved upward obviously. The palatal thickness and total thickness of the alveolar bone showed significant decrease at the crest level and midroot level after retraction while the apical level showed significant increase(P<0.05). The palatal vertical bone level also showed great loss (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: After extensive retraction of the maxillary incisors, tilt movements are controlled with high traction hooks and microscrew implants. The decreases in palatal bone thickness are much more significant compared with the increases in labial bone thickness. Alveolar bone remodeling doesn't follow the movement of tooth, suggesting that the limitation of anterior teeth retraction should be taken into consideration.

Key words: Incisors retraction, Mini-screw implant anchorage, Cone-beam CT, Alveolar bone remodeling

中图分类号:

R783.5

陈香, 张向凤, 黄倩倩, 张翼, 喻凤, 王华桥. 微种植体支抗辅助内收上切牙后牙槽骨改建的锥形束CT研究[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(2): 150-155.

CHEN Xiang, ZHANG Xiang-feng, HUANG Qian-qian, ZHANG Yi, YU Feng, WANG Hua-qiao. Evaluation of the changes of alveolar bone around the upper incisors after retraction with mini implant anchorage using cone-beam CT[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2018, 27(2): 150-155.

参考文献

[1] 宋卫华, 刘红英, 李东, 等. 青少年双颌前突患者拔牙矫治前后侧面部软组织改变的研究[J]. 口腔医学, 2010, 30(9): 535-537.
[2] Ten Hoeve A, Mulie RM.The effect of antero-postero incisor repositioning on the palatal cortex as studied with laminography[J]. J Clin Orthod, 1976, 10(11): 804-822.
[3] Wehrbein H, Bauer W, Diedrich P.Mandibular incisors, alveolar bone, and symphysis after orthodontic treatment. A retrospective study[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1996, 110(3): 239-246.
[4] Timock AM, Cook V, McDonald T, et al. Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2011, 140(5): 734-744.
[5] Molen AD.Considerations in the use of cone-beam computed tomography for buccal bone measurements[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2010, 137(4 Suppl): S130-135.
[6] Ahn HW, Moon SC, Baek SH.Morphometric evaluation of changes in the alveolar bone and roots of the maxillary anterior teeth before and after en masse retraction using cone-beam computed tomography[J]. Angle Orthod, 2012, 83(2): 212-221.
[7] Sarikaya S, Haydar B, Ciger S, et al.Changes in alveolar bone thickness due to retraction of anterior teeth[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2002, 122(1): 15-26.
[8] Melsen B.Biological reaction of alveolar bone to orthodontic tooth movement[J]. Angle Orthod, 1999, 69(2): 151-158.
[9] Reitan K.Influence of variation in bone type and character on tooth movement[J]. Eur Orthod Soc Trans, 1963, 39: 137-154.
[10] Deangelis V.Observations on the response of alveolar bone to orthodontic force[J]. Am J Orthod, 1970, 58(3): 284-294.
[11] 许天民, 刘妍, 江久汇, 等. 正畸内收上切牙对上颌牙槽骨改建的临床研究[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2004, 20(4): 431-433.
[12] Veyre-Goulet S, Fortin T, Thierry A.Accuracy of linear measurement provided by cone beam computed tomography to assess bone quantity in the posterior maxilla: a human cadaver study[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2008, 10(4): 226-230.
[13] Lagravère MO, Carey J, Toogood RW, et al.Three-dimensional accuracy of measurements made with software on cone-beam computed tomography images[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2008, 134(1): 112-116.
[14] Patcas R, Müller L, Ullrich O, et al.Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography at different resolutions assessed on the bony covering of the mandibular anterior teeth[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2012, 141(1): 41-50.
[15] Timock AM, Cook V, McDonald T, et al. Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2011, 140(5): 734-744.
[16] Vardimon AD, Graber TM, Voss LR, et al.Determinants controlling iatrogenic external root resorption and repair during and after palatal expansion[J]. Angle Orthod, 1991, 61(2): 113-122.
[17] 刘妍, 江久汇, 张海萍, 等. 正畸治疗后下颌前牙区牙槽骨改建状况的长期追踪研究[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2007, 23(6): 831-835.
[18] Sung SJ, Jang GW, Chun YS, et al.Effective en-masse retraction design with orthodontic mini-implant anchorage: a finite element analysis[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2010, 137(5): 648-657.
[19] 王华桥, 邓锋, 张磊, 等. 微种植体支抗整体内收上颌前牙阻抗中心的三维有限元研究[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2010, 32(7): 669-671.
[20] Vardimon AD, Graber TM, Voss LR, et al.Determinants controlling iatrogenic external root resorption and repair during and after palatal expansion[J]. Angle Orthod, 1991, 61(2): 113-122.
[21] 房兵, 许燕玲, 毛丽霞, 等. 种植支抗辅助内收前牙后牙槽骨的改建[J]. 中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2008, 6(1): 28-33.
[22] Guo QY, Zhang SJ, Liu H, et al.Three-dimensional evaluation of upper anterior alveolar bone dehiscence after incisor retraction and intrusion in adult patients with bimaxillary protrusion malocclusion[J]. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B, 2011, 12(12): 990-997.
[23] Edwards JG.A study of the anterior portion of the palate as it relates to orthodontic therapy[J]. Am J Orthod, 1976, 69(3): 249-273.
[24] Cobo J, Argüelles J, Puente M, et al.Dentoalveolar stress from bodity tooth movement at different levels of bone loss[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1996, 110(3): 256-262.

微种植体支抗辅助内收上切牙后牙槽骨改建的锥形束CT研究

Evaluation of the changes of alveolar bone around the upper incisors after retraction with mini implant anchorage using cone-beam CT

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李苏娜, 宋文尚, 刘子略, 杜月茹, 蔡世新. 义齿咬合板联合综合物理疗法对颞下颌关节盘不可复性前移位的疗效评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(3): 273-278.
[2]	彭源浩, 庄昕仪, 喻婷, 吕冬梅, 温秀杰, 程钎. 青少年颧牙槽嵴区皮质骨厚度的锥形束CT测量及其与颈椎骨龄的相关性研究[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(6): 623-629.
[3]	黄仲敏, 张赟, 李小兵. 替牙列早期上颌慢速扩弓对上颌中段牙及牙槽嵴的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(5): 501-507.
[4]	李贵宏, 谢思静, 林梓桐, 张婷, 汤旭娜, 胡勤刚. 下颌第二磨牙C形根管治疗前后根管壁厚度测量分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(4): 395-400.
[5]	王文丽, 傅亚婷, 刘华, 马潇. 上颌前牙美学区牙龈三维形态的锥形束CT测量分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(2): 177-182.
[6]	张薇, 陈威, 陈志方. 可调式活动牵引器治疗上颌唇侧倒置阻生中切牙效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(2): 193-197.
[7]	宋珏, 刘好好, 刘嘉靓, 陈美华. 上颌磨牙与上颌窦黏膜增厚发生的相关性分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(6): 638-642.
[8]	吕云松, 李朝晖. 颞下颌关节紊乱综合征伴偏侧咀嚼患者锥形束CT特征分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(6): 653-656.
[9]	周子芊, 陈振琦. 上颌窦底对上颌第一磨牙近中移动的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(6): 661-667.
[10]	林翔, 傅裕杰, 任根强, 温佳欢, 陈宇飞, 张旗. U-Net神经网络分割锥形束CT影像中下颌磨牙牙体与牙髓腔及其准确性验证[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(5): 454-459.
[11]	马智菲, 周梦琪, 王丽珍, 承清, 洪瑾. Er:YAG 激光在小型猪牙髓血运重建术中的应用效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(4): 367-373.
[12]	黄锦程, 赵华强, 李国菊. Stafne骨腔影像学特征：基于CBCT的回顾性分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(4): 439-444.
[13]	林怡君, 鄢洁雅, 王天鸽, 周志捷, 廖盛轩, 毛丽霞, 刘加强. 减数正畸治疗中中切牙牙根及牙槽骨形态变化的锥形束CT测量分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(2): 211-216.
[14]	杜悦, 彭笑, 韩瑞, 王栋, 胡洁, 高廷益, 张凯. 颌骨囊肿开窗治疗临床特征动态研究[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(6): 658-662.
[15]	马晓晴, 赵宁, 董晛, 钱文昊. 2种锥形束CT转化头颅侧位片的定点一致性探讨[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(5): 522-525.