Insignia固定矫治器定制系统在正畸治疗中的效果评价

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2022.01.020

上海口腔医学 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1): 96-99.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2022.01.020

Insignia固定矫治器定制系统在正畸治疗中的效果评价

刘帆¹, 刘琳¹, 王艳红²

1.大连市口腔医院正畸科,2.修复科,辽宁大连 116021

收稿日期:2021-01-29 修回日期:2021-05-14 出版日期:2022-02-25 发布日期:2022-03-10
通讯作者: 王艳红,E-mail：wangyanhong_603@163.com
作者简介:刘帆（1982-）,男,硕士研究生,副主任医师,E-mail：hy25355@126.com
基金资助:
辽宁省科技计划项目(201602213)

Evaluation of the effect of Insignia system in customized orthodontic treatment

LIU Fan¹, LIU Lin¹, WANG Yan-hong²

1. Department of Orthodontics, 2. Department of Prosthodontics, Dalian Stomatological Hospital. Dalian 116021, Liaoning Province, China

Received:2021-01-29 Revised:2021-05-14 Online:2022-02-25 Published:2022-03-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的: 探讨Insignia固定矫治器定制系统在正畸治疗中的应用效果。方法: 选择2018年3月—2019年8月大连市口腔医院收治的错畸形患者71例,应用随机数字表法分为定制组和非定制组。非定制组采用Damon Q自锁托槽治疗,定制组采用Insignia矫治系统定制个性化自锁托槽及弓丝治疗。初始校准阶段,每8周复查1次,此后每6周复查1次。比较2组的临床疗效、就诊次数、治疗计划时间、治疗持续时间、同行评估等级指数（PAR）及治疗过程中并发症和托槽情况。采用SPSS 20.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果: 定制组总有效率显著高于非定制组（P<0.05）;2组治疗持续时间相比,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;定制组就诊次数显著大于非定制组,治疗计划时间显著长于非定制组（P<0.05）;2组患者治疗后的中线、牙错位、磨牙颊侧关系、覆盖、覆和加权总分均较治疗前有改变,定制组变化更明显（P<0.05）;2组患者牙龈出血和托槽脱落率相比,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;定制组托槽松动率显著高于非定制组（P<0.05）。结论: 与非定制系统相比,Insignia矫治定制系统虽就诊次数多、治疗计划时间较长、托槽松动率高,但其效果较好。总体而言,对治疗持续时间影响不大,并未增加托槽脱落率。

关键词: 错畸形, 正畸治疗, Insignia矫治系统, 固定矫治器, 牙移动

Abstract: PORPOSE: To investigate the effect of Insignia system in customized orthodontic treatment. METHODS: A total of 71 patients with malocclusion undergoing orthodontic treatment in Dalian Stomatological Hospital from March 2018 to August 2019 were enrolled, and divided into two groups according to random number table methods. Patients in non-customized group received Damon Q self-locking brackets, while patients in customized group received individualized brackets combined with Insignia appliance. The patients were revisited every 8 weeks in initial phase and thereafter every 6 weeks. The clinical efficacy, number of visits, time required for treatment planning and treatment duration were compared between the two groups. The severity of malocclusion, changes after treatment and improvement before and after treatment were evaluated by peer assessment rating (PAR). The complications and loose brackets during treatment were observed. SPSS 20.0 software package was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: The total effective rate of customized group was significantly higher than that of non-customized group (P<0.05). No significant difference was found in treatment duration between the two groups(P>0.05). The number of visits and time required for treatment planning of customized group were significantly longer than those of non-customized group(P<0.05). After treatment, the midline, tooth dislocation, molar buccal occlusion, overbite, overjet and weighted PAR total scores increased in both groups, and the increase was more significant in customized group(P<0.05). The gingival bleeding rate showed no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05), while the rate of loose brackets was significantly higher in customized group than in non-customized group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with non-customized system, insignia customized system has more visits, longer treatment planning time and higher bracket loosening rate, but its effect is better. In general, it has little effect on the treatment duration and does not increase the bracket shedding rate.

Key words: Malocclusion, Orthodontic treatment, Insignia orthodontic system, Fixed appliance, Tooth movement

中图分类号:

R783.5

刘帆, 刘琳, 王艳红. Insignia固定矫治器定制系统在正畸治疗中的效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(1): 96-99.

LIU Fan, LIU Lin, WANG Yan-hong. Evaluation of the effect of Insignia system in customized orthodontic treatment[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2022, 31(1): 96-99.

参考文献

[1] Yassir YA, Mcintyre GT, Bearn DR.The impact of labial fixed appliance orthodontic treatment on patient expectation, experience, and satisfaction: an overview of systematic reviews[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2019, 42(3): 223-230.
[2] 陈婉红, 苏江凌, 蔡世雄, 等. 隐形矫治器、自锁托槽与传统托槽对成人正畸患者牙周指数及龈沟液炎性因子的影响[J].实用口腔医学杂志, 2017, 33(5): 642-646.
[3] Papakostopoulou M, Hurst D.Customised fixed appliance systems and treatment duration[J]. Evid Based Dent, 2018, 19(2): 50-55.
[4] Kragt L, Jaddoe V, Wolvius E, et al.The association of subjective orthodontic treatment need with oral health-related quality of life[J]. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 2017, 45(4):365-371.
[5] Antoun JS, Mei L, Gibbs K, et al.Effect of orthodontic treatment on the periodontal tissues[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2017, 74(1): 140-157.
[6] Cerroni S, Pasquantonio G, Condò R, et al.Orthodontic fixed appliance and periodontal status: an updated systematic review[J]. Open Dent J, 2018, 12:614-622.
[7] 马明宇, 王晨曦, 张晓虹, 等. 应用三维有限元分析个性化舌侧矫治中不同托槽设计对下颌第二磨牙近中移动方式的影响[J].实用口腔医学杂志, 2019, 135(4): 543-547.
[8] Martina R, D'Antò V, De Simone V, et al. Cephalometric outcomes of a new orthopaedic appliance for Class Ⅲ malocclusion treatment[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2020, 42(2): 187-192.
[9] 刘尚愚, 冯云霞. 三维数字化技术在口腔正畸学中的应用[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2017, 44(3): 350-353.
[10] 张达,王林川,周彦恒,等. 3D打印间接粘接托槽精度[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版),2017, 49(4): 704-708.
[11] 邹晨, 邹道星, 艾毅龙. 口内三维扫描结合CBCT建立数字化模型的研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2019, 35(9): 902-905.
[12] 钟雅静, 冯刚. 不同矫治器与粘接方式对青少年男性固定矫治患者牙周健康影响的临床对照研究[J].重庆医科大学学报, 2018, 43(9): 1226-1232.
[13] Woon SC,Thiruvenkatachari B.Early orthodontic treatment for Class Ⅲ malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2017, 151(1): 28-52.
[14] 左志刚,李洪发,徐津,等. 3种正畸矫治器对牙周炎症及龈沟液炎性因子影响的长期研究[J].口腔医学研究, 2018, 34(11): 1223-1227.
[15] 张明灿, 马啸宙, 武杰, 等. 牙初期排齐阶段矫形弓丝在不同入槽方式作用下的摩擦力[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2018, 22(18): 2860-2865.
[16] 郭昱成, 李沐嘉, 董明, 等. 改良式间接粘接技术在正畸临床中的应用研究[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2018, 34(3): 373-376.

Insignia固定矫治器定制系统在正畸治疗中的效果评价

Evaluation of the effect of Insignia system in customized orthodontic treatment

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	霍美玲, 雷颖, 辛欣, 张颖, 王瑞梅. 2种矫治器对轻中度Ⅰ类错𬌗患者前牙牙根及牙槽骨的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(4): 407-410.
[2]	丁敏林, 张海亮, 张吉敏. Frankel Ⅲ型矫治器联合口唇肌训练治疗替牙期错𬌗畸形的疗效评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(4): 432-437.
[3]	欧晓丽, 方志欣, 龙智灵, 罗海欧, 唐倩. 无托槽隐形矫治器内收前牙时后牙移动趋势及牙周膜应力分布[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(3): 239-244.
[4]	宫汝娟, 何磊. 正畸联合骨水平种植体修复在牙列缺损中的应用效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(1): 76-79.
[5]	沈刚. 口腔正畸理论更新与技术研发的几点思考[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(2): 113-119.
[6]	窦尉尉, 岳从雷, 张家坤, 张广德, 沙耀利, 刘娟, 靳霞, 杜衍晓. 骨皮质切开术上颌快速扩弓辅助正畸-正颌联合治疗骨性Ⅲ类错畸形效果分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(6): 643-647.
[7]	鞠雅琼, 徐晓明, 韩祥永, 马茵, 王桂香. 口腔专科护理模式对青少年正畸患者牙周健康的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(6): 657-660.
[8]	刘维佳, 唐镇, 张琦, 姜莉萍. 低能量微波照射对大鼠正畸牙移动及牙周组织改建的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(2): 156-161.
[9]	林怡君, 鄢洁雅, 王天鸽, 周志捷, 廖盛轩, 毛丽霞, 刘加强. 减数正畸治疗中中切牙牙根及牙槽骨形态变化的锥形束CT测量分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(2): 211-216.
[10]	房兵, 金作林, 白玉兴, 王林, 赵志河, 李巍然, 白丁, 贺红, 刘月华, 胡敏, 宋锦璘, 陈莉莉, 曹阳, 吴亭熹, 厉松, 李煌, 施洁珺, 唐国华, 储沨婷. 儿童和青少年早期错畸形诊治策略的专家共识[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(5): 449-455.
[11]	丁琴, 汪隼, 赖光云. 口颌面肌功能紊乱患儿家长对口面肌功能治疗的认知调查[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(5): 539-542.
[12]	沈刚. 伴颞下颌关节病错畸形的正畸治疗原则与方案[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(4): 337-343.
[13]	孟坤, 孙健, 李亚莉, 刘延山, 陈晨, 徐泽先, 孙鸣, 张秀秀, 周东阳. 正颌手术对骨性Ⅲ类错畸形患者语音功能的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(4): 394-401.
[14]	毛晓燕, 杨佳音, 李佳, 徐睿. 成人骨性Ⅱ类错畸形上气道与上、下颌骨形态分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(4): 419-423.
[15]	刘明瑾, 李乐, 陈菊芳, 郝鑫, 杨儒, 田玉楼. 舌刺联合头帽颏兜与前方牵引矫治前牙反的疗效比较[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(4): 429-434.