上海口腔医学 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1): 84-88.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2022.01.018

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

单纯种植体与天然牙联合种植体的临床修复效果及影响因素分析

段咏华, 俞敏, 潘亮, 林华俊, 郭美玲   

  1. 江西省上饶市人民医院 口腔科,江西 上饶 334000
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-26 修回日期:2021-05-07 出版日期:2022-02-25 发布日期:2022-03-10
  • 通讯作者: 段咏华,E-mail:mea11r@163.com
  • 作者简介:段咏华(1976-),女,硕士,副主任医师
  • 基金资助:
    江西省卫生健康委科技计划(20203408)

Clinical effect and related influencing factors of implant and implant-natural tooth in dental restoration

DUAN Yong-hua, YU Min, PAN Liang, LIN Hua-jun, GUO Mei-ling   

  1. Department of Stomatology, Shangrao People's Hospital. Shangrao 334000, Jiangxi Province, China
  • Received:2021-03-26 Revised:2021-05-07 Online:2022-02-25 Published:2022-03-10

摘要: 目的: 分析单纯种植体与天然牙联合种植体的临床修复效果及影响因素。方法: 选择2016年5月—2017年6月上饶市人民医院收治的采用天然牙联合种植体修复的牙列缺损患者34例(联合组),单纯种植体修复的牙列缺损患者33例(单纯组),随访3年,评价2组患者修复与骨吸收情况,收集患者一般资料,分析种植体失败影响因素。采用SPSS 20.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果: 联合组种植体修复成功率为93.65%,与单纯组的95.08%相比无显著差异(P>0.05)。联合组术后1年半,牙槽嵴吸收水平均高于单纯组(P<0.05)。种植体失败组,女性、上颌后牙区、牙体牙髓病、缺失骨密度Ⅳ级、糖尿病、吸烟、种植体直径>4.5 mm、长度>12 mm、牙周探针深度>3 mm 、龈沟出血指数≥2均显著高于成功组(P<0.05)。缺牙骨密度、糖尿病、吸烟及天然牙龈沟出血指数≥2、探针深度>3 mm是种植体失败的危险因素(P<0.05)。结论: 单纯种植体与天然牙联合种植体均具有较好的临床修复效果,短期随访结果显示,天然牙联合种植体修复是可行的。缺牙骨密度、糖尿病、吸烟及牙周龈沟出血指数≥2、探针深度>3 mm均为种植体失败的危险因素。

关键词: 单纯种植体, 天然牙联合种植体, 修复效果, 影响因素

Abstract: PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical effect and related influencing factors of implant and implant-natural tooth in dental restoration. METHODS: A total of 67 edentulous patients receiving dental implantation in Shangrao People's Hospital from May 2016 to June 2017 were enrolled, including 34 cases of implant-natural tooth supported restoration (combined group) and 33 cases of implant restoration (single group). During the 3-year follow-up, the repair effect and bone resorption of the two groups were evaluated. The general data of patients were collected, then the influencing factors of implant failure were screened. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 20.0 software package. RESULTS: The success rate of dental restoration was 93.65% in combined group, and 95.08% in simple implant group, with no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The bone resorption of the alveolar ridge in combined group was significantly higher than that in simple implant group 1 and half years after operation (P<0.05). The proportion of female, maxillary posterior area, dental pulp disease, grade IV bone mineral density loss, diabetes mellitus, smoking history, implant diameter>4.5 mm, length>12 mm, periodontal probe depth>3 mm, and sulcus bleeding index≥2 were significantly higher in implant failure group than in implant success group (P<0.05). Bone mineral density loss, diabetes mellitus, smoking history, sulcus bleeding index≥2 and periodontal probe depth>3 mm were the risk factors of implant failure(P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both implant and implant-natural tooth are effective in dental restoration, and implant-natural tooth restoration has good short-term efficacy, while bone mineral density loss, diabetes mellitus, smoking history, sulcus bleeding index≥2 and periodontal probe depth>3mm are the risk factors of implant failure.

Key words: Implant, Implant-natural tooth, Restoration effect, Influencing factor

中图分类号: