2种阻生牙拔除法联合即刻种植的效果评价

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2019.06.015

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的评价高速涡轮机微创技术与传统技术联合即刻种植对阻生牙术后镇痛、开口度及牙槽骨吸收的效果。方法选择2014年1月—2018年12月在宿迁市人民医院进行治疗的阻生牙患者80例作为研究对象,使用数字表将患者随机分为实验组和对照组,每组40例。实验组患者采取高速涡轮机微创手术联合即刻种植治疗,对照组患者采用传统手术联合即刻种植治疗,观察2组患者术后牙槽骨吸收、疼痛、肿胀、开口受限、拔牙窝完整性以及并发症之间的差异。采用SPSS 19.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果术后3个月,实验组患者的上颌前牙区、上颌磨牙区、下颌前牙区以及下颌磨牙区的种植体高度均显著低于对照组。术后1 d,实验组患者的VAS评分显著低于对照组（P<0.05）;术后3个月,2组患者VAS评分之间的差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。术后3个月,实验组患者的拔牙窝完整性、肿胀度以及开口受限程度显著低于对照组;实验组患者的术后牙根折断、邻牙松动、牙龈撕裂和舌侧骨板骨折均显著低于对照组。结论阻生牙拔除术中采用高速涡轮机微创治疗联合即刻种植,患者术后牙槽骨吸收、肿胀以及拔牙窝完整性显著改变,术后疼痛感降低,并发症较少,值得推广应用。

关键词: 即刻修复, 高速涡轮微创治疗, 开口受限, 牙槽骨吸收, 疼痛

Abstract: PURPOSE: To observe the effects of immediate implantation combined with high-speed turbine minimally invasive technology and traditional technology on postoperative analgesia, mouth opening and alveolar bone resorption after removal of complex impacted teeth. METHODS: Eighty patients with impacted teeth treated in our hospital from January 2014 to December 2018 were randomly divided into 2 groups: experimental group and control group with 40 cases in each group. Patients in the experimental group were treated with high-speed turbine minimally invasive surgery combined with immediate implantation, while patients in the control group were treated with traditional surgery combined with immediate implantation. Differences in alveolar bone resorption, pain, swelling, limited mouth opening, intact extraction socket and complications were compared between the two groups. SPSS 19.0 software package was used to perform statistical analysis. RESULTS: Three months after operation, the implant height of the maxillary anterior teeth, maxillary molar, mandibular anterior teeth and mandibular molar areas in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group. One day after operation, the VAS score of the experimental group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P <0.05). Three months after operation,there was no significant difference in VAS score between the two groups (P>0.05); but intact extraction socket, swelling degree and mouth opening limitation of the experimental group were significantly lower than those of the control group. The root fracture, adjacent teeth loosening, gingival tear, lingual bone plate fracture of the experimental group were significantly lower than those of the control group. CONCLUSIONS: High-speed turbine minimally invasive treatment combined with immediate implantation after extraction of complex impacted teeth can significantly increase alveolar bone resorption, relieve swelling and preserve intact extraction socket, reduce pain and complications after operation. It is recommended to be popularized in clinic.

Key words: Immediate repair, High-speed turbine minimally invasive treatment, Limited mouth opening, Alveolar bone resorption, Pain

中图分类号:

R782.1

宋勇, 李想, 蔡嫚, 王耀辉. 2种阻生牙拔除法联合即刻种植的效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(6): 632-635.

SONG Yong, LI Xiang, CAI Man, WANG Yao-hui. Clinical application of two extraction methods of impacted teeth combined with immediate implantation[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2019, 28(6): 632-635.

参考文献

[1] 袁春平, 彭辉, 石玉,等. 2种拔牙方法在下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术中的应用比较[J]. 口腔生物医学, 2018, 9(4): 38-41.
[2] 张子川, 李珊, 方会清. 2种局麻药物在下牙槽神经阻滞麻醉中效果的比较[J]. 中国新药与临床杂志, 2017, 36(1): 56-58.
[3] 刘朝阳, 唐璟, 唐祎, 等. 超声骨刀联合45º反角涡轮钻拔除下颌复杂阻生智齿的临床疗效观察[J]. 临床口腔医学杂志, 2018, 34(8): 495-498.
[4] 邹弘驹, 李永生. 高速涡轮牙钻联合微创拔牙刀拔除阻生智牙后局部炎症应激反应及疼痛介质分泌的评价[J]. 海南医学院学报, 2018, 24(4): 146-149.
[5] 马嘉平, 南晓梅, 陈晓涛, 等. 高速气涡轮切割手机联合专用加长裂钻对拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙的效果分析[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2017, 17(8): 1558-1561.
[6] Wychowañski P, Woliñski J, Marcin K, et al.Immediate palatal molar implants: a simple, safe, minimally invasive technique[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2017, 37(37): e297-e301.
[7] Lee L, Burke JP, Debecheadams T, et al.Transanal minimally invasive surgery for local excision of benign and malignant rectal neoplasia: outcomes from 200 consecutive cases with midterm follow up[J]. Ann Surg, 2017, 267(5): 910-916.
[8] Stankowski T, Aboul-Hassan SS, Marczak J, et al.Minimally invasive thoracoscopic closure versus, thoracotomy in children with patent ductus arteriosus[J]. J Surg Res, 2017, 208: 1-9.
[9] Radefeld K, Papp S, Havlicek V, et al.Endoscopy-mediated intratubal insemination in the cow-development of a novel minimally invasive AI technique[J]. Theriogenology, 2018, 115: 117-123.
[10] Barone A, Marconcini S, Giacomelli L, et al.A randomized clinical evaluation of ultrasound bone surgery versus traditional rotary instruments in lower third molar extraction[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2010, 68(2): 330-336.
[11] Thomas J, Harris A, Hedge S, et al.Alternative management of impacted permanent central incisor[J]. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, 2018, 11(6): 529-531.
[12] Fujii-Abe K, Umino M, Kawahara H, et al.New method for postoperative pain relief using a combination of noxious and non-noxious stimuli after impacted wisdom tooth extraction[J]. J Oral Sci, 2019, 61(2): 364-369.
[13] Jawad Z, Carmichael F, Houghton N, et al.A review of cone beam computed tomography for the diagnosis of root resorption associated with impacted canines, introducing an innovative root resorption scale[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol, 2016, 122(6): 765-771.
[14] 郑丽明. 高速涡轮牙钻及微创拔牙刀在阻生智牙拔除术中的应用[J]. 实用中西医结合临床, 2017, 17(3): 44-45.
[15] 费立龙. 微动力手机在复杂阻生牙拔除术中的应用[J]. 河北医药, 2018, 40(8): 118-120.