上海口腔医学

上海口腔医学 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 544-549.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2022.05.018

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

3种根管充填方法在慢性根尖周炎根管治疗中的短期疗效观察

郭晶晶1#, 汤屹群2#, 何宏2,*, 徐震2,*   

  1. 1.太原市中心医院 口腔科,山西 太原 030009;
    2.上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院 口腔综合科,上海交通大学口腔医学院,国家口腔医学中心, 国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心,上海市口腔医学重点实验室,上海 200011
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-13 修回日期:2021-12-30 出版日期:2022-10-25 发布日期:2022-11-01
  • 通讯作者: 何宏,E-mail: doctorfoxhe@gmail.com;徐震,E-mail: 98xz@sina.com。*共同通信作者
  • 作者简介:郭晶晶（1982-）,女,本科,主治医师,E-mail:1152670809@qq.com;汤屹群（1987-）,女,本科,护师,E-mail:candytyq@126.com。#并列第一作者

Short-term efficacy of three root canal filling methods in endodontic treatment of chronic periapical inflammation

GUO Jing-jing1, TANG Yi-qun2, HE Hong2, XU Zhen2   

  1. 1. Department of Stomatology, Taiyuan Central Hospital. Taiyuan 030009, Shanxi Province;
    2. Department of General Dentistry, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology. Shanghai 200011, China
  • Received:2021-10-13 Revised:2021-12-30 Online:2022-10-25 Published:2022-11-01

PDF (PC)

261

摘要： 目的: 比较3种根管充填方法在治疗慢性根尖周炎中的短期疗效,为临床上选择合理有效的根管治疗方法提供参考。方法: 选择2019年10月—2020年10月就诊于上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院口腔综合科、接受根管充填治疗的慢性根尖周炎患者120例,随机分为3组（n=40）。3组均行根管充填治疗, A组为iRoot SP糊剂单尖法充填,B组为AH-plus糊剂热牙胶垂直加压充填,C组为AH-plus糊剂冷牙胶侧压充填。通过统计3组根管充填时间,使用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)比较分析3组患者治疗后24 h的疼痛评分;采用根尖周指数 (periapicalindex, PAI) 评定X线片并结合临床检查,对3组患者的根管治疗时间、疼痛情况、根管治疗效果进行评价。采用SPSS 22.0软件包进行数据分析。结果: 3组患者的根管充填时间分别为A组（75.50±7.44）s,B组 (85.38±3.46) s,C组 (102.33±3.32) s,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;组间两两比较具有统计学差异。3组患者术后发生疼痛发生率A组为25%,B组为25%,C组为32.5%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);A组与B组之间无统计学差异,A组、B组与C组之间有统计学差异。3 组患者X线片 PAI 评分比较结果显示,PAI总分的时间效应F=498.93,P<0.001,提示不同时间点的PAI总分差异有统计学意义;组别效应F=0.91,P=0.406,提示不同组的PAI总分差异无统计学意义;时间和组别的交互效应F=0.44,P=0.777,提示不同组在不用时间点的PAI总分上差异无统计学意义。3 组患者3个月、12个月总有效率A组为97.5%、97.3%,B组为97.5%、97.2%,C组为90%、91.9%,差异无统计学意义(P>0. 05);两两相比,各组间差异无统计学意义。结论: 相比其他2种根管充填方式,iRoot SP糊剂单尖法根管充填技术对于节约临床操作时间,增加患者就诊舒适度具有良好效果。

关键词: 根管治疗, 根管充填, 单尖根管充填法, 热垂直加压, 冷侧压

Abstract: PURPOSE: To provide a reference basis for clinical selection of a reasonable and effective root canal treatment by comparing the short-term clinical efficacy of three root canal filling methods in the treatment of chronic periapical inflammation. METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients with chronic periapical inflammation who received root canal filling between October 2019 and October 2020 were randomly divided into 3 groups, with 40 patients in each group. All patients received root canal filling, group A was filled with iRoot SP paste by matched-taper single cone obturation technique, group B was filled with AH-plus paste by warm vertical condensation, and group C filled with AH-plus paste by cold lateral condensation. Root canal filling time in the three groups was calculated, pain score 24 h after treatment was determined using visual analogue scale/score(VAS), and periapical index(PAI) was used to evaluate radiographs. SPSS 22.0 statistical software was applied for data analysis. RESULTS： Root canal filling times in the three groups were (75.50±7.44) s in group A, (85.38±3.46) s in group B and (102.33±3.32) s in group C, the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05); the incidence of postoperative pain in the three groups was 25% in group A, 25% in group B and 32.5% in group C, the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05). There was no significant difference between group A and group B, but significant difference existed between group A, group B and group C. The results of comparison of PAI scores showed a time effect was F=498.93, P<0.001, suggesting significant difference in total PAI scores at different time points; a group effect was F=0.91, P=0.406, suggesting no significant difference in total PAI scores of the 3 groups; an interaction effect of time and group was F=0.44, P=0.777, suggesting that there was no significant difference in total PAI scores of the 3 groups at the time points. The total effective rate at 3 and 12 months was 97.5%, 97.3% in group A, 97.5%, 97.2% in group B and 90%, 91.9% in group C, the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the other 2 root canal filling methods, the iROOT SP paste matched-taper single cone obturation technique is clinically effective in terms of time saving and increasing the comfort of the patients' visit.

Key words: Root canal treatment, Root canal filling, Matched-taper single cone obturation technique, Warm vertical condensation, Cold lateral condensation

中图分类号: