上海口腔医学

上海口腔医学 ›› 2017, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (5): 535-538.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2017.05.014

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

3种根管工作长度测量方法的准确性比较

陆长玺, 朱亚琴   

  1. 上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院·口腔医学院 口腔综合科,上海市口腔医学重点实验室, 上海市口腔医学研究所 国家口腔疾病临床研究中心,上海 200011
  • 收稿日期:2017-05-11 修回日期:2017-07-21 出版日期:2017-10-25 发布日期:2017-11-23
  • 通讯作者: 朱亚琴,E-mail：zyq1590@163.com
  • 作者简介:陆长玺（1983-）,男,博士,E-mail:changxilu@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    上海高校高峰高原学科建设项目

Comparison of the accuracy of measuring root canal working length in 3 different ways

LU Chang-xi, ZHU Ya-qin   

  1. Department of General Dentistry, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology; Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center of Stomatology. Shanghai 200011, China
  • Received:2017-05-11 Revised:2017-07-21 Online:2017-10-25 Published:2017-11-23

PDF (PC)

254

摘要： 目的比较3种根管工作长度测量方法的准确性。方法选取2015年1月—2016年6月治疗的90例患者,232个根管随机分为3组,分别采用X线片、Raypex5型根尖定位仪和i-root型根尖定位仪测量根管工作长度。依据充填质量评估测得工作长度的准确性。采用SPSS19.0软件包进行统计学处理。结果X线组、Raypex5组及i-root组的根管充填成功率分别为88.5%、92.9%和96.1%,组间比较差异无显著性（P>0.05）。磨牙、前磨牙及前牙的根管充填成功率分别为92.5%、96.6%和95.2%,组间比较差异无显著性（P>0.05）。结论Raypex5型根长测定仪及i-root型根长测定仪的临床效果与传统的X线法相似,但可避免不必要的电离辐射,提高临床工作效率。

关键词: 根管治疗, 工作长度, 电子根尖定位仪

Abstract: PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of measuring root canal working length with two different electronic apex locators and digital X-ray. METHODS: Ninety patients treated from January 2015 to June 2016 were selected, 232 root canals in total were randomly divided into 3 groups: X-ray group, Raypex5 group and i-root group. The accuracy of working length measured was assessed according to the filling quality of related main tips. The data were analyzed with SPSS19.0 software package for Chi-square test. RESULTS: The success rates for root canal filling of X-ray group, Raypex5 group and i-root group were 88.5%, 92.9% and 96.1% respectively with no significant difference between 3 groups (P>0.05). The success rates for root canal filling of molar teeth, premolar teeth and front teeth were 92.5%, 96.6% and 95.2% respectively with no significant difference between the 3 groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical effect of Raypex 5 and i-root electronic apex locators for working length measuring is similar to that of conventional X-ray, but the use of electronic apex locators can avoid unnecessary ionizing radiation and improve clinical efficiency.

Key words: Root canal treatment, Working length, Electronic apex locators

中图分类号: