3种镍钛器械预备重度弯曲根管后牙本质微裂纹的观察

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2019.06.005

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的研究3种镍钛器械预备重度弯曲根管后牙本质微裂的发生情况。方法收集临床上拔除的近中根牙根弯曲度在25°~40°的磨牙240颗,按弯曲度25°~30°（不包括25°）、30°~35°、35°~40°随机分为A、B、C 3组,每组80个标本,均用K锉预备到15#。将3组随机分为4个亚组,每个亚组20颗,1组为对照组,另外3组为实验组。对照组不进行镍钛预备,将实验组中的牙根分别用WaveOne、ProTaper Next、M3-Pro 3种镍钛器械进行预备,并浸泡于1%亚甲蓝24 h。然后分别取牙根最弯处以及距最弯处上、下2 mm的截断面,在体视显微镜下观察各断面牙本质微裂纹的情况。采用SPSS 20.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果 WaveOne、ProTaper Next、M3-Pro 3组均使牙本质产生微裂,WaveOne组发生比例最高,ProTaper Next组最低,WaveOne组与其他2组的差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）,ProTaper Next组与M3-Pro组无显著差异（P>0.05）。随着牙根弯曲角度的增大,WaveOne、ProTaper Next、M3-Pro 3组牙本质微裂的数量增加,除Waveone组在 A（25°~30°）与C（35°~40°）2组中牙本质微裂发生比例的差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）外,其余均无统计学差异（P>0.05）。结论 ProTaper Next与M3-Pro更有利于中重度弯曲根管的预备。

关键词: 镍钛器械, 根管预备, 弯曲根管, 弯曲度, 牙本质微裂

Abstract: PURPOSE: This study was aimed to compare the incidence of dentinal microcracks produced by 3 kinds of Ni-Ti instruments during root canal procedures in severely curved canals. METHODS: Two hundred and forty extracted human molars with mesial roots of 25° to 40° curvatures were selected and divided into A, B, C group, with 80 teeth in each group according to root curvature of 25°-30° （excluding 25° ）, 30°-35° ,35°-40°. Each of them was prepared with K file to 15#. Then, each group was divided into 4 sub-groups (n=20), one was as control, the others were prepared with WaveOne, ProTaper Next and M3-Pro, respectively. After preparation, all roots were stained with 1% methylene blue for 24 hours. The roots were then sectioned at the most curved plane and 2mm below and above the most curved plane with alow-speed saw under cold water. Stereomicroscope was used to inspect dentinal microcracks and differences between each group were analyzed using Chi-square test with SPSS 20.0 software package. RESULTS: Microcracks were observed in the group of WaveOne, ProTaper Next and M3-Pro. WaveOne system induced more dentinal microcracks compared with ProTaper Next and M3-Pro system (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between ProTaper Next and M3-Pro system (P>0.05). The number of dentinal microcracks in WaveOne, ProTaper Next and M3-Pro group increased with the increase of root curvature. Except Waveone in group A (25°-30°) and group C (35°-40°), the occurrence of dentinal microcracks in two groups had significant difference (P<0.05), there was no significant difference among other groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to WaveOne, ProTaper Next and M3-Pro are more suitable for severely curved canal preparation.

Key words: Ni-Ti instruments, Root canal preparation, Curved canal, Root curvature, Dentinal microcracks

中图分类号:

R781.05

汤玉红, 徐睿, 朱倩, 冉幸. 3种镍钛器械预备重度弯曲根管后牙本质微裂纹的观察[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(6): 581-585.

TANG Yu-hong, XU Rui, ZHU Qian, RAN Xing. Comparison of dentinal microcracks formation in severely curved root canal with different Ni-Ti instruments[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2019, 28(6): 581-585.

参考文献

[1] Monga P, Bajaj N, Mahajan P, et al.Comparison of incidence of dentinal defects after root canal preparation with continuous rotation and reciprocating instrumentation[J]. Singapore Dent J, 2015, 36: 29-33.
[2] Kim HC, Lee MH, Yum J, et al.Potential relationship between design of nickel-titanium rotary instruments and vertical root fracture[J]. J Endod, 2010, 36(7): 1195-1199.
[3] Li SH, Lu Y, Song D, et al.Occurrence of dentinal microcracks in severely curved root canals with ProTaper universal, WaveOne, and ProTaper Next File Systems[J]. J Endod, 2015, 41(11): 1875-1879.
[4] Blum JY, Machtou P, Micallef JP.Location of contact areas on rotary Profile instruments in relationship to the forces developed during mechanical preparation on extracted teeth[J]. Int Endod J, 1999, 32(1): 108-114.
[5] 占云燕,杨国斌. ProTaper Next锉和WaveOne锉根管成形能力的对比研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2016, 32(9): 925-928.
[6 ] 鲁杰, 于淼, 仪虹, 等. 机用单根锉WaveOne与ProTaper镍钛器械对重度弯曲根管的预备及评价6 ] 鲁杰, 于淼, 仪虹, 等. 机用单根锉WaveOne与ProTaper镍钛器械对重度弯曲根管的预备及评价[J]. 中国医刊, 2015, 50(1): 58-60.
[7] Capar ID, Arslan H, Akcay M, et al.Effects of ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, and HyFlex instruments on crack formation in dentin[J]. J Endod, 2014, 40(9): 1482-1484.
[8] Testarelli L, Plotino G, Al-Sudani D, et al.Bending properties of a new nickel-titanium alloy with a lower percent by weight of nickel[J]. J Endod, 2011, 37(9): 1293-1295.
[9] 侯惠敏, 魏伦全, 韩宇, 等. 3种镍钛锉对弯曲根管成形效果的评价[J]. 中华老年口腔医学杂志, 2018, 16(3): 137-141.
[10] 成鹏飞, 韩宇, 魏伦全, 等. 3种机用镍钛器械对重度弯曲根管成形能力的研究[J].牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志, 2018, 28(11): 639-643.
[11] 张笑维, 梁景平. 往复式与连续旋转式2类镍钛器械对根管预备效果的比较分析[J].口腔材料器械杂志, 2017, 26(4): 214-217, 225.
[12] Karatas E, Gündüz HA, Kirici DÖ, et al.Dentinal crack formation during root canal preparations by the twisted file adaptive, ProTaper Next, ProTaper Universal, and WaveOne instruments[J]. J Endod, 2015, 41(2): 261-264.
[13] Shantiaee Y, Dianat O, Mosayebi G, et al.Effect of root canal preparation techniques on crack formation in root dentin[J]. J Endod, 2019, 45(4): 447-452.
[14] 于飞, 杨欣. 镍钛器械不同运动方式根管预备后牙根微裂的体外研究[J]. 临床口腔医学杂志, 2016, 32(3): 176-178.
[15] Wilcox LR, Roskelley C, Sutton T.The relationship of root canal enlargement to finger-spreader induced vertical root fracture[J]. J Endod, 1997, 23(8): 533-534.
[16] Kim HC, Sung SY, Ha JH, et al.Stress generation during self-adjusting file movement: minimally invasive instrumentation[J]. J Endod, 2013, 39(12): 1572-1575.
[17] 朱亚琴. 有关弯曲细小根管预备的若干问题[J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2011, 4(9): 518-521.
[18] Versluis A, Messer HH, Pintado MR.Changes in compaction stress distributions in roots resulting from canal preparation[J]. Int Endod J, 2006, 39(12): 931-939.
[19] 郭灵巧, 来国芹, 王潇轶. 3种镍钛器械预备根管对牙根微裂发生和分布的影响[J]. 牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志, 2018, 28(6): 356-359.
[20] Bier CA, Shemesh H, Tanomaru-Filho M, et al.The ability of different nickel-titanium rotary instruments to induce dentinal damage during canal preparation[J]. J Endod, 2009, 35(2): 236-238.

[1]	梁昭璜, 张瑶. 4种机用镍钛器械预备树脂模拟弯曲根管成形能力比较[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(1): 54-58.
[2]	封菲, 曹立群, 张旗. XP-endo Shaper和ProTaper Next对弯曲根管成形能力及微裂纹形成的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(3): 225-229.
[3]	张斌, 贾明玉, 樊睿, 田剑刚, 葛学军, 黄瑞哲. 新型往复运动单支锉根管预备对牙本质微裂的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(1): 1-5.
[4]	郭林溪, 李向芬, 赵苑汐, 苏勤. 机用镍钛器械根管预备过程中加入连续根管外冲洗对根管内液体置换的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(4): 354-358.
[5]	胡媛平, 钱毅. 不同预备方法对根管治疗诊间急症和充填效果的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(2): 198-200.
[6]	PRIYA Vishnu, 邵皎皎, 封菲, 张旗. 被动超声冲洗对弯曲根管的碎屑清理能力和根管形态的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(1): 6-11.
[7]	刘丹, 于静涛, 仇丽鸿. 不同厚度氮化钛涂层对镍钛器械显微硬度及切削性能的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(1): 58-61.
[8]	江慧超, 汤玲玲, 韩文利. 4种镍钛器械预备弯曲根管后成形能力比较[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(1): 44-47.
[9]	冯二玫, 杨剑珍, 张彦霞. TF和S3预备磨牙重度弯曲根管的效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(2): 146-149.
[10]	周磊, 王佳, 臧艳君. Er,Cr:YSGG水激光用于根管治疗约诊间疼痛的疗效观察[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(2): 184-186.
[11]	孟丹婕, 姚莉莉, 李矛. 3种机用镍钛锉对磨牙根管弯曲度的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(4): 407-410.
[12]	韦梦瑶, 王晓丽, 李雁, 高雅. 上颌前磨牙根管变异及其与上颌窦关系的锥形束CT研究[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(2): 156-163.
[13]	付双, 张艳, 宋文斌. 60例妊娠期牙髓炎过渡性治疗的疗效评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(1): 68-72.
[14]	赵隽隽，周卓君，韩俊力，朱亚琴. Mtwo镍钛器械在钙化阻塞根管治疗中的应用[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2016, 25(2): 204-207.
[15]	杨红丽，唐睿，龚瑜，张玉皓. 根管预备及根管消毒期间诊间疼痛的临床观察[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2016, 25(2): 227-230.