XP-endo Shaper和ProTaper Next对弯曲根管成形能力及微裂纹形成的影响

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2023.03.001

上海口腔医学 ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 225-229.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2023.03.001

XP-endo Shaper和ProTaper Next对弯曲根管成形能力及微裂纹形成的影响

封菲^1,2, 曹立群^1,2, 张旗¹

1.同济大学口腔医学院牙体牙髓病学教研室,上海牙组织再生与修复工程技术研究中心,上海 200072;
2.上海市口腔医院牙体牙髓病科,上海市颅颌面发育与疾病重点实验室,上海 200031

收稿日期:2022-02-18 修回日期:2022-05-11 出版日期:2023-06-25 发布日期:2023-06-28
通讯作者: 张旗,E-mail: qizhang@tongji.edu.cn
作者简介:封菲(1994-),女,硕士,E-mail: 346096626@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(81870760、81570966); 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(22120190217)

Comparative study of two novel nickel-titanium instruments for root canal preparation in curved canals on shaping ability and microcrack formation

FENG Fei^1,2, CAO Li-qun^1,2, ZHANG Qi¹

1. Department of Dentistry and Endodontics, School of Stomatology, Tongji University, Shanghai Engineering Research Center for Dental Tissue Regeneration and Restoration. Shanghai 200072;
2. Department of Dentistry and Endodontics, Shanghai Stomatology Hospital & School of Stomatology, Fudan University; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Craniomaxillofacial Development and Disease, Fudan University. Shanghai 200031, China

Received:2022-02-18 Revised:2022-05-11 Online:2023-06-25 Published:2023-06-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：运用显微CT（Micro-CT）评价ProTaper Next(PTN)和XP-endo Shaper(XPS)对弯曲根管成形能力及微裂纹形成的影响。方法：收集16颗2个独立近中根管的下颌磨牙,共32个根管,弯曲度为25°~35°。采用2种新型镍钛器械(PTN和XPS)进行预备,记录预备时间。预备前、后用Micro-CT扫描,并进行三维重建,对根管偏移、轴中心率、体积增加量、管/根宽度比和微裂纹发生率进行分析。采用SPSS 22.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果：预备后XPS组在距根尖1、3、5、7 mm水平根管偏移较PTN组小,在1、3、7 mm水平轴中心率较PTN高,具有统计学差异（P<0.05）,轴中心率在5 mm水平两者无显著性差异（P>0.05）。XPS组预备时间显著少于PTN组（P<0.05）。2种器械预备后体积增加量、管/根宽度比无显著差异（P>0.05）。2种器械预备后均无新裂纹产生。结论：PTN与XPS均能安全、有效预备下颌磨牙重度弯曲根管,而XPS在预备成形方面具有更好的中心定位性及更高的预备效率。

关键词: 新型镍钛器械, 弯曲根管, 根管预备, 成形能力, 微裂纹

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the shaping ability and microcrack formation of ProTaper Next (PTN) and XP-endo Shaper (XPS) systems in the mesial curved root canals of mandibular molars by using micro-CT scans. METHODS: Sixteen mandibular molars with two independent mesial root canals and curvature ranging from 25° to 35° were randomly divided into two groups. The preparation time was recorded. Pre-and-postoperative images were scanned by micro-CT. The following parameters were evaluated: canal transportation, centering ratio, changes in canal volume, canal/root width ratio and microcrack formation. SPSS 22.0 software package was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Significant difference (P <0.05) was found for canal transportation at the section of 1, 3, 5, 7 mm from the apical foramen and centering ratio at the section of 1, 3, 7 mm from the apical foramen, where XPS files were superior. There was no significant difference for centering ratio at the section of 5 mm from the apical foramen(P>0.05). XPS groups significantly consumed less time during the preparation(P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups for the increase amount of volume, and canal/root width ratio(P>0.05). Both instruments did not induce new microcrack after preparation. CONCLUSIONS: PTN and XPS can both shape curved canals effectively and safely. XPS showed better centering ability and reduced preparation time during preparation.

Key words: New thermo-mechanical nickel-titanium instrument, Curved canal, Root canal preparation, Shaping ability, Microcrack

中图分类号:

R781.3

封菲, 曹立群, 张旗. XP-endo Shaper和ProTaper Next对弯曲根管成形能力及微裂纹形成的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(3): 225-229.

FENG Fei, CAO Li-qun, ZHANG Qi. Comparative study of two novel nickel-titanium instruments for root canal preparation in curved canals on shaping ability and microcrack formation[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2023, 32(3): 225-229.

参考文献

[1] Kyaw Moe MM, Ha JH, Jin MU, et al.Root canal shaping effect of instruments with offset mass of rotation in the mandibular first molar: a micro-computed tomographic study[J]. J Endod, 2018, 44(5): 822-827.
[2] Wu H, Peng C, Bai Y, et al.Shaping ability of ProTaper Universal, WaveOne and ProTaper Next in simulated L-shaped and S-shaped root canals[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2015, 15(1): 27-33.
[3] De-Deus G, Belladonna FG, Souza EM, et al.Micro-computed tomographic assessment on the effect of ProTaper Next and twisted file adaptive systems on dentinal cracks[J]. J Endod, 2015, 41(7): 1116-1119.
[4] Li SH, Lu Y, Song D, et al.Occurrence of dentinal microcracks in severely curved root canals with ProTaper Universal, WaveOne, and ProTaper Next file systems[J]. J Endod, 2015, 41(11): 1875-1879.
[5] Duque JA, Vivan RR, Cavenago BC, et al.Influence of NiTi alloy on the root canal shaping capabilities of the ProTaper Universal and ProTaper gold rotary instrument systems[J]. J Appl Oral Sci, 2017, 25(1): 27-33.
[6] Sant'Anna Júnior A, Cavenago BC, Ordinola-Zapata R, et al. The effect of larger apical preparations in the danger zone of lower molars prepared using the Mtwo and reciproc systems[J]. J Endod, 2014, 40(11): 1855-1859.
[7] de Carvalho KKT, Petean IBF, Silva-Sousa AC, et al. Impact of several NiTi-thermally treated instrumentation systems on biomechanical preparation of curved root canals in extracted mandibular molars[J]. Int Endod J, 2022, 55(1): 124-136.
[8] Ruddle C, Machtou P, West J. The shaping movement: fifth-generation technology[J]. Dent Today, 2013, 32(4):94, 96-99.
[9] Azim AA, Piasecki L, Da Silva Neto UX, et al. XP shaper, a novel adaptive core rotary instrument: micro-computed tomographic analysis of its shaping abilities[J]. J Endod, 2017, 43(9): 1532-1538.
[10] Versiani MA, Carvalho KKT, Mazzi-Chaves JF, et al.Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of the shaping ability of XP-endo shaper, irace, and edgefile systems in long oval-shaped canals[J]. J Endod, 2018, 44(3): 489-495.
[11] Sabeti M, Kazem M, Dianat O, et al.Impact of access cavity design and root canal taper on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth: an ex vivo investigation[J]. J Endod, 2018, 44(9): 1402-1406.
[12] Miguéns-Vila R, Martín-Biedma B, De-Deus G, et al.Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of dentinal microcracks after preparation of curved root canals with ProTaper gold, WaveOne gold, and ProTaper Next instruments[J]. J Endod, 2021, 47(2): 309-314.
[13] Rödig T, Krämer J, Müller C, et al.Incidence of microcracks after preparation of straight and curved root canals with three different niti instrumentation techniques assessed by micro-CT[J]. Aust Endod J, 2019, 45(3): 394-399.
[14] Cassimiro M, Romeiro K, Gominho L, et al.Effects of reciproc, ProTaper Next and WaveOne gold on root canal walls: a stereomicroscope analysis[J]. Iran Endod J, 2018, 13(2): 228-233.
[15] Aksoy Ç, Keris EY, Yaman SD, et al.Evaluation of XP-endo shaper, reciproc blue, and ProTaper Universal NiTi systems on dentinal microcrack formation using micro-computed tomography[J]. J Endod, 2019, 45(3): 338-342.
[16] Ugur Aydin Z, Keskin NB, Özyürek T.Effect of reciproc blue, XP-endo shaper, and WaveOne gold instruments on dentinal microcrack formation: a micro-computed tomographic evaluation[J]. Microsc Res Tech, 2019, 82(6): 856-860.
[17] Alkahtany SM, Al-Madi EM.Dentinal microcrack formation after root canal instrumentation by XP-endo shaper and ProTaper Universal: a microcomputed tomography evaluation[J]. Int J Dent, 2020: 4030194.
[18] Stringheta CP, Pelegrine RA, Kato AS, et al.Micro-computed tomography versus the cross-sectioning method to evaluate dentin defects induced by different mechanized instrumentation techniques[J]. J Endod, 2017, 43(12): 2102-2107.
[19] Vieira MLO, Dantas HV, De Sousa FB, et al.Morphologic changes of apical foramen and microcrack formation after foraminal enlargement: a scanning electron microscopic and micro-computed tomographic analysis[J]. J Endod, 2020, 46(11): 1726-1732.
[20] Martins J, Oliveira BP, Duarte DA, et al.Micro-computed tomographic assessment of dentinal microcrack formation in straight and curved root canals in extracted teeth prepared with hand, rotary and reciprocating instruments[J]. Int Endod J, 2021, 54(8): 1362-1368.
[21] Karatas E, Gündüz HA, Kirici DÖ, et al.Incidence of dentinal cracks after root canal preparation with ProTaper gold, profile vortex, f360, reciproc and ProTaper Universal instruments[J]. Int Endod J, 2016, 49(9): 905-910.
[22] 汤玉红, 徐睿, 朱倩, 等. 3种镍钛器械预备重度弯曲根管后牙本质微裂纹的观察[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(6): 581-585.
[23] Wilcox LR, Roskelley C, Sutton T.The relationship of root canal enlargement to finger-spreader induced vertical root fracture[J]. J Endod, 1997, 23(8): 533-534.
[24] Santos-Filho PCF, Veríssimo C, Raposo LHA, et al.Influence of ferrule, post system, and length on stress distribution of weakened root-filled teeth[J]. J Endod, 2014, 40(11): 1874-1878.

XP-endo Shaper和ProTaper Next对弯曲根管成形能力及微裂纹形成的影响

Comparative study of two novel nickel-titanium instruments for root canal preparation in curved canals on shaping ability and microcrack formation

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	梁昭璜, 张瑶. 4种机用镍钛器械预备树脂模拟弯曲根管成形能力比较[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(1): 54-58.
[2]	胡媛平, 钱毅. 不同预备方法对根管治疗诊间急症和充填效果的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(2): 198-200.
[3]	PRIYA Vishnu, 邵皎皎, 封菲, 张旗. 被动超声冲洗对弯曲根管的碎屑清理能力和根管形态的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(1): 6-11.
[4]	江慧超, 汤玲玲, 韩文利. 4种镍钛器械预备弯曲根管后成形能力比较[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(1): 44-47.
[5]	杨笑晗, 杨旭. 3种往复旋转单支镍钛器械预备模拟弯曲根管的效果比较[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(6): 595-598.
[6]	冯二玫, 杨剑珍, 张彦霞. TF和S3预备磨牙重度弯曲根管的效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(2): 146-149.
[7]	汤玉红, 徐睿, 朱倩, 冉幸. 3种镍钛器械预备重度弯曲根管后牙本质微裂纹的观察[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(6): 581-585.
[8]	周磊, 王佳, 臧艳君. Er,Cr:YSGG水激光用于根管治疗约诊间疼痛的疗效观察[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(2): 184-186.
[9]	孟丹婕, 姚莉莉, 李矛. 3种机用镍钛锉对磨牙根管弯曲度的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(4): 407-410.
[10]	付双, 张艳, 宋文斌. 60例妊娠期牙髓炎过渡性治疗的疗效评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(1): 68-72.
[11]	仇宁，王楚瑜，刘宇飞，于小青，薛明. 3种机用镍钛器械预备模拟弯曲根管的成形能力比较[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2016, 25(2): 191-194.
[12]	杨红丽，唐睿，龚瑜，张玉皓. 根管预备及根管消毒期间诊间疼痛的临床观察[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2016, 25(2): 227-230.
[13]	田啊林, 黎小川, 陆雨桐, 叶晶晶, 刘燕, 何俐. 根管弯曲度对电子根尖定位仪测量准确性的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2014, 23(6): 685-688.
[14]	陈詹宏. 声波根管器械联合机用Mtwo镍钛锉在根管预备中的应用[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2014, 23(5): 624-627.
[15]	陈峰, 乔佳云, 李小凤. Pathfile和Reciproc联合应用于预备弯曲根管的临床评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2013, 22(3): 338-341.