玻璃陶瓷高嵌体和金属全冠修复根管治疗后下颌前磨牙的抗折强度

上海口腔医学 ›› 2015, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (3): 311-314.

玻璃陶瓷高嵌体和金属全冠修复根管治疗后下颌前磨牙的抗折强度

王玉善,周屹立

宁波口腔医院特需科,浙江宁波 315000

收稿日期:2015-02-10 出版日期:2015-06-20 发布日期:2015-07-24
通讯作者: 周屹立,Tel: 0574-87328181,E-mail:
作者简介:王玉善（1978-）,女,硕士研究生,E-mail:pipioppo@163.com

Fracture resistance of endodontically treated mandibular premolars restored with e.max press all-ceramic onlays and metal crowns

WANG Yu-shan,ZHOU Yi-li

Department of VIP Consultants, Ningbo Dental Hospital. Ningbo 315000, Zhejiang Province, China

Received:2015-02-10 Online:2015-06-20 Published:2015-07-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的:比较玻璃陶瓷高嵌体和金属全冠修复经根管治疗后的下颌前磨牙的牙体抗折强度。方法:选择45颗完整的下颌前磨牙,经根管治疗后,随机分为3组。A组以流体树脂垫底,树脂充填作为对照组;B组和C组以流体树脂垫底后,牙体均预备为MOD洞型。B组以树脂充填后,再进行牙体预备,以钴铬合金金属全冠修复;C组牙体预备,以玻璃陶瓷高嵌体黏结修复。将3组标本用万能实验机垂直加载,直至标本发生纵裂,记录各样本牙裂时的最大载荷数值与折裂模式。采用SPSS13.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果:A、B、C组的平均抗压载荷值分别为(234.44±44.36)、(267.11±65.55)、 (314.91±33.67) N。2个实验组与对照组相比差异均有显著性(P<0.05);B组的抗压载荷值高于C组,差异有显著性(P<0.05)。3组样本牙折裂模式两两比较,结果显示组间差异均有显著性(P<0.05)。结论:玻璃陶瓷高嵌体是保护经根管治疗后的下颌前磨牙的较好方法。

关键词: 根管治疗, 高嵌体, 抗折强度

Abstract: PURPOSE: To compare the fracture resistance of endodontically treated mandibular premolars restored with e.max press all-ceramic onlays and metal crowns. METHODS: Forty-five endodontically treated mandibular premolars were randomly divided into 3 groups. Group A were filled with resin as control. Specimens of group B and C were instrumented and prepared for two-wall cavities and restored with metal crowns and ceramic onlays respectively. The specimens were thermocycled, exposed to cyclic loading, and submitted to the static fracture resistance test. Fracture loads and mode of failure were evaluated. The data was analyzed with SPSS13.0 software package. RESULTS: Samples in 2 experimental groups exhibited higher fracture load values than that of the control group（P<0.05）. Group C showed higher fracture load values and more favourable fracture patterns compared with group B (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Endodontically treated mandibular molars restored with indirect onlays provide significantly increased fracture resistance and favourable fracture patterns.

Key words: Endodontical, Fracture resistance, Onlay

中图分类号:

R781.06

王玉善,周屹立. 玻璃陶瓷高嵌体和金属全冠修复根管治疗后下颌前磨牙的抗折强度[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2015, 24(3): 311-314.

WANG Yu-shan,ZHOU Yi-li. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated mandibular premolars restored with e.max press all-ceramic onlays and metal crowns[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2015, 24(3): 311-314.

参考文献

[1] Dammaschke T, Nykiel K, Sagheri D, et al. Influence of coronal restorations on the fracture resistance of root canal-treated premolar and molar teeth: a retrospective study [J]. Aust Endod J, 2013, 39(2): 48-56.
[2] Rosenstiel SF, Land MF. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics [M]. 4 Ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 2006.
[3] Roberson T, Heymann HO, Swift EJ, et al. Sturdevant’s art and science of operative dentistry [M]. 6 Ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 2012.
[4] Mohammadi N, Kahnamoii MA, Yeganeh PK, et al. Effect of fiber post and cusp coverage on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars directly restored with composite resin [J]. J Endod, 2009, 35(10):1428-1432.
[5] Caplan DJ, Kolker J, Rivera EM, et al. Relationship between number of proximal contacts and survival of root canal treated teeth [J].Int Endod J, 2002, 35(2): 193-199.
[6] Mondelli RF, Ishikiriama SK, de Oliveira Filho O, et al. Fracture resistance of weakened teeth restored with condensable resin with and without cusp coverage[J]. J Appl Oral Sci, 2009, 17(3): 161-165.
[7] Cheung GS, Chan TK. Long-term survival of primary root canal treatment carried out in a dental teaching hospital[J]. Int Endod J, 2003, 36(2): 117-128.
[8] ElAyouti A, Serry MI, Geis-Gerstorfer J, et al. Influence of cusp coverage on the fracture resistance of premolars with endodontic access cavities [J]. Int Endod J, 2011, 44(6): 543-549.
[9] Aquilino SA, Caplan DJ. Relationship between crown placement and the survival of endodontically treated teeth[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2002, 87(3): 256-263.
[10] Arunpraditkul S, Saengsanon S, Pakviwat W. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth: three walls versus four walls of remaining coronal tooth structure[J]. J Prosthodont, 2009, 18(1): 49-53.
[11] Taha NA, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of root filled teeth restored with direct resin restorations [J].J Dent, 2011, 39(8): 527-535.
[12] Tang W, Wu Y, Smales RJ. Identifying and reducing risks for potential fractures in endodontically treated teeth[J]. J Endod, 2010, 36(4): 609-617.
[13] Benazzi S, Kullmer O, Grosse IR, et al. Using occlusal wear information and finite element analysis to investigate stress distributions in human molars [J]. J Anat, 2011,219(3): 259-272.
[14] Hanada T, Quevedo CG, Okitsu M, et al. Effects of new adhesive resin root canal filling materials on vertical root fractures [J]. Aust Endod J, 2010, 36(1): 19-23.
[15] Ferracane JL. Resin composite state of the art[J]. Dent Mater, 2011, 27(1): 29-38.