硅酸盐根管封闭剂的体外细胞毒性、成骨潜力和抗菌活性评价

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2023.03.005

上海口腔医学 ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 246-250.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2023.03.005

硅酸盐根管封闭剂的体外细胞毒性、成骨潜力和抗菌活性评价

杨习良, 郑天霞, 李文, 王武良, 尹紫涵, 白宇宏

华北理工大学口腔医学院,河北唐山 063200

收稿日期:2022-04-26 修回日期:2022-07-14 出版日期:2023-06-25 发布日期:2023-06-28
通讯作者: 白宇宏,E-mail:518uu@sina.com
作者简介:杨习良（1995-）,男,在读硕士研究生,E-mail:xl252988@163.com

In vitro study on cytotoxicity, osteogenic potential and antibacterial activity of silicate root canal sealers

YANG Xi-liang, ZHENG Tian-xia, LI Wen, WANG Wu-liang, YIN Zi-han, BAI Yu-hong

College of Stomatology, North China University of Science and Technology. Tangshan 063200 , Hebei Province, China

Received:2022-04-26 Revised:2022-07-14 Online:2023-06-25 Published:2023-06-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：评价新型硅酸锶基根管封闭剂C-Root SP的体外生物相容性和抗菌活性,为临床选择合适的根管封闭剂提供参考。方法：制备C-Root SP、iRoot SP和AH Plus浸提液,体外培养 L929 细胞和 MC3T3-E1细胞,比较3种封闭剂的细胞毒性和成骨潜力。将新鲜根管封闭剂与粪肠球菌溶液混合,利用直接接触实验（direct contact text,DCT）测定封闭剂的抗菌活性。采用SPSS 25.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果：24、48、72 h时,各组封闭剂细胞毒性均有显著差异（P<0.01）;与AH Plus相比,C-Root SP的细胞毒性更低（P<0.01）。C-Root SP促进细胞碱性磷酸酶活性方面优于AH Plus（P<0.01）;促矿化结节形成能力方面iRoot SP最强,C-Root SP次之,AH Plus最弱（P<0.01）。而C-Root SP可抑制粪肠球菌生长,其抑菌率显著高于AH Plus（P<0.01）,C-Root SP与iRoot SP对粪肠球菌的抑菌作用无显著差异（P>0.05）。结论：硅酸锶根管封闭剂C-Root SP具有较低的细胞毒性、一定的成骨潜力和对粪肠球菌的抗菌活性,可用于根管充填。

关键词: 根管封闭剂, 硅酸锶, 细胞毒性, 成骨潜力, 抗菌活性

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the in vitro biocompatibility and antibacterial activity of a new type of strontium silicate-based C-Root SP root canal sealer, and to provide a reference for clinical selection of sealers. METHODS: C-Root SP, iRoot SP and AH Plus extracts were prepared, L929 cells and MC3T3-E1 cells were cultured in vitro, and the cytotoxicity and osteogenic potential of the three sealers were compared. Fresh sealers were mixed with Enterococcus faecalis solution and the antibacterial activity of the sealer was determined by direct contact text (DCT). SPSS 25.0 software package was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: At 24, 48, and 72 h, the cytotoxicity of the sealers in each group were significantly different (P<0.01). Compared with AH Plus, the cytotoxicity of C-Root SP was lower (P<0.01). C-Root SP was superior to AH Plus in promoting the activity of alkaline phosphatase(ALP) (P<0.01). iRoot SP was the strongest in promoting the formation of mineralized nodules, followed by C-Root SP, and the weakest was AH Plus(P<0.01). C-Root SP inhibited the growth of Enterococcus faecalis, and its antibacterial rate was significantly higher than AH Plus(P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The strontium silicate root canal sealer C-Root SP has low cytotoxicity, certain osteogenic potential and antibacterial activity against Enterococcus faecalis, so it can be used for root canal filling.

Key words: Root canal sealer, Strontium silicate, Cytotoxicity, Osteogenic potential, Antibacterial activity

中图分类号:

R781.3

杨习良, 郑天霞, 李文, 王武良, 尹紫涵, 白宇宏. 硅酸盐根管封闭剂的体外细胞毒性、成骨潜力和抗菌活性评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(3): 246-250.

YANG Xi-liang, ZHENG Tian-xia, LI Wen, WANG Wu-liang, YIN Zi-han, BAI Yu-hong. In vitro study on cytotoxicity, osteogenic potential and antibacterial activity of silicate root canal sealers[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2023, 32(3): 246-250.

参考文献

[1] Zordan-Bronzel CL, Tanomaru-Filho M, Rodrigues EM, et al.Cytocompatibility, bioactive potential and antimicrobial activity of an experimental calcium silicate-based endodontic sealer[J]. Int Endod J, 2019, 52(7): 979-986.
[2] Bernáth M, Szabó J.Tissue reaction initiated by different sealers[J]. Int Endod J, 2003, 36(4): 256-261.
[3] Jorge éG, Tanomaru-Filho M, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, et al.Periapical repair following endodontic surgery: two-and three-dimensional imaging evaluation methods[J]. Braz Dent J, 2015, 26(1): 69-74.
[4] Oztan MD, Yilmaz S, Kalayci A, et al.A comparison of the in vitro cytotoxicity of two root canal sealers[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2003, 30(4): 426-429.
[5] Φrstavik D.Materials used for root canal obturation: technical, biological and clinical testing[J]. Endod Topic, 2005, 12(1): 25-38.
[6] Giacomino CM, Wealleans JA, Kuhn N, et al.Comparative biocompatibility and osteogenic potential of two bioceramic sealers[J]. J Endod, 2019, 45(1): 51-56.
[7] Rôças IN, Siqueira JF, Santos KRN.Association of Enterococcus faecalis with different forms of periradicular diseases[J]. J Endod, 2004, 30(5): 315-320.
[8] Wang Z, Shen Y, Haapasalo M.Dentin extends the antibacterial effect of endodontic sealers against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms[J]. J Endod, 2014, 40(4): 505-508.
[9] Nair NR, Henry S, Cano V, et al.Microbial status of apical root canal system of human mandibular first molars with primary apical periodontitis after “one-visit” endodontic treatment[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2005, 99(2): 231-252.
[10] Jing Y, Gong T, Duan C, et al.In vitro cytocompatibility and osteogenic potential of calcium silicate-based dental cements in a root canal-filling model[J]. J Int Med Res, 2020, 48(4):300060519894801.
[11] Geurtsen W.Biocompatibility of root canal filling materials[J]. Aust Endod J, 2001, 27(1): 12-21.
[12] Gomes ME, Reis RL, Cunha AM, et al.Cytocompatibility and response of osteoblastic-like cells to starch-based polymers: effect of several additives and processing conditions[J]. Biomaterials, 2001, 22(13): 1911-1917.
[13] 朴维英. 6种根管封闭剂的体外细胞毒性比较研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2015.
[14] Xing M, Wang X, Wang E, et al.Bone tissue engineering strategy based on the synergistic effects of silicon and strontium ions[J]. Acta Biomater, 2018, 72: 381-395.
[15] Zhang W, Li Z, Peng B.Effects of iRoot SP on mineralization-related genes expression in MG63 cells[J]. J Endod, 2010, 36(12): 1978-1982.
[16] Mamalis A, Markopoulou C, Lagou A, et al.Oestrogen regulates proliferation, osteoblastic differentiation, collagen synthesis and periostin gene expression in human periodontal ligament cells through oestrogen receptor beta[J]. Arch Oral Bio, 2011, 56(5): 446-455.
[17] Gomes-Cornélio AL, Rodrigues EM, Salles LP, et al.Bioactivity of MTA Plus, Biodentine and an experimental calcium silicate-based cement on human osteoblast-like cells[J]. Int Endod J, 2017, 50(1): 39-47.
[18] Lin K, Xia L, Li H, et al.Enhanced osteoporotic bone regeneration by strontium-substituted calcium silicate bioactive ceramics[J]. Biomaterials, 2013, 34(38): 10028-10042.
[19] Wang J, Zhang L, Sun X, et al.Preparation and in vitro evaluation of strontium-doped calcium silicate/gypsum bioactive bone cement[J]. Biomed Mater, 2014, 9(4): 045002.
[20] Hurtel-Lemaire AS, Mentaverri R, Caudrillier A, et al.The calcium-sensing receptor is involved in strontium ranelate-induced osteoclast apoptosis new insights into the associated signaling pathways[J]. J Biol Chem, 2009, 284(1): 575-584.
[21] Khan S, Kaleem M, Fareed MA, et al.Chemical and morphological characteristics of mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cements[J]. Dent Mater J, 2016, 35(1): 112-117.
[22] Siqueira JF.Endodontic infections: concepts, paradigms, and perspectives[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2002, 94(3): 281-293.
[23] Lovato KF, Sedgley CM.Antibacterial activity of endosequence root repair material and proroot MTA against clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecalis[J]. J Endod, 2011, 37(11): 1542-1546.
[24] Nirupama DN, Nainan MT, Ramaswamy R, et al.In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial efficacy of four endodontic biomaterials against Enterococcus faecalis, Candida albicans, and Staphylococcus aureus[J]. Int J Biomater, 2014: 383756.
[25] Brauer DS, Karpukhina N, Kedia G, et al.Bactericidal strontium-releasing injectable bone cements based on bioactive glasses[J]. J R Soc Interface, 2013, 10(78): 20120647.

硅酸盐根管封闭剂的体外细胞毒性、成骨潜力和抗菌活性评价

In vitro study on cytotoxicity, osteogenic potential and antibacterial activity of silicate root canal sealers

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 12

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	迪丽娜尔·库热西, 杨娅, 何宏. GuttaFlow Bioseal封闭剂对椭圆形根管抗垂直折裂能力的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(3): 250-254.
[2]	郑晶晶, 康馨允, 李少明, 刘嘉成, 孙凯, 高岭, 侯铁舟. MTA、iRoot SP和AH Plus 对人牙周膜干细胞增殖及分化的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(5): 449-455.
[3]	任玉兰, 路璐, 李盛林, 俞光岩, 刘鹤. 人胚胎干细胞源角质形成细胞用于药物毒理检测的探讨[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(3): 257-261.
[4]	林瑞, 郁春华, 孙健. 用于三维打印咬合板的聚碳酸酯材料性能研究[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(5): 467-471.
[5]	罗恒, 高海, 许雪飞, 冯云枝. 杜仲胶复合义齿软衬材料的研制及细胞毒性检测[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(4): 378-383.
[6]	张长源, 牛刚, 靳祎祎, 于皓, 程辉. 3种树脂水门汀对人牙龈成纤维细胞的体外细胞毒性[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2017, 26(6): 594-598.
[7]	张宁, 李鑫, 苗雷英, 吴娟, 葛久禹, 刘超, 杨卫东. 生物根管封闭剂iRoot SP在根管根尖封闭中的应用评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2017, 26(4): 395-398.
[8]	郭珲, 潘克清, 邓婧, 刘学玉, 宋佳. 羧甲基壳聚糖锌多肽复合材料对人牙周膜成纤维细胞的毒性[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2017, 26(2): 162-166.
[9]	史爽, 包志凡, 陈旭, 张丹丹. 新型牙髓治疗材料iRoot BP Plus对人牙龈成纤维细胞的细胞毒性[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2014, 23(6): 681-684.
[10]	李俊亮, 王文梅, 葛久禹, 季骏, 王天丛. 5种牙本质黏结剂对人牙周膜细胞毒性的比较[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2013, 22(6): 628-633.
[11]	周群, 苗磊, 冯靖雯, 余和东, 郭蕾, 林晓萍. 钴铬钼合金对L929细胞生物学行为的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2013, 22(4): 407-413.
[12]	毕玮;余优成;龚逸明;周康;赵青华;胡美玉. 活性钙离子液对离体牙超微形态的影响与细胞毒性评价 [J]. 上海口腔医学, 2012, 21(4): 402-406.