腮腺保留式调强放疗对唾液组成、流量及口干的影响

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2020.04.012

上海口腔医学 ›› 2020, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 396-399.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2020.04.012

腮腺保留式调强放疗对唾液组成、流量及口干的影响

齐鑫¹, 谢敬生¹, 王梓欣²

1.庆阳市人民医院口腔科,甘肃庆阳 745000;
2.甘肃省妇幼保健院,甘肃兰州 730000

收稿日期:2019-10-25 修回日期:2019-12-23 出版日期:2020-08-25 发布日期:2020-09-11
通讯作者: 齐鑫,E-mail：wex241933@163.com
作者简介:齐鑫（1984-）,男,本科,主治医师
基金资助:
甘肃省自然科学基金 (15RJZA076)

Effect of parotid sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy on salivary composition, flow and dry mouth prevention

QI Xin¹, XIE Jing-sheng¹, WANG Zi-xin²

1. Department of Stomatology, Qingyang People's Hospital. Qingyang 745000;
2. Gansu Provincial Maternity and Child-care Hospital. Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China

Received:2019-10-25 Revised:2019-12-23 Online:2020-08-25 Published:2020-09-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：探讨头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者经腮腺保留式调强放疗后唾液组成、流量及口干的变化。方法：收集2016年5月—2018年11月庆阳市人民医院进行放疗的头颈部鳞癌患者101例,按照治疗方法分为调强放疗组（54例）与常规放疗组（47例）,比较2组患者临床病理特征参数,治疗前、后腮腺摄取指数,治疗后唾液成分、口干、口咽反应症状与分度。采用SPSS 20.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果：2组患者肿瘤部位、TNM临床分期与分化程度无显著差异（P>0.05）;治疗后调强放疗组患者唾液中总蛋白,分泌型IgA,钙、磷浓度显著大于常规放疗组（P<0.05）;治疗后2组患者腮腺摄取指数、分泌指数与唾液流速较治疗前显著下降（P<0.05）;且调强放疗组患者腮腺摄取指数、分泌指数与唾液流速显著大于常规放疗组（P<0.05）;调强放疗组治疗后口干情况显著优于常规放疗组（P<0.05）;治疗后调强放射组出现咽痛与咽下困难患者比例显著低于常规放疗组（P<0.05）;调强放疗组患者治疗后口咽分度情况显著优于常规放疗组（P<0.05）。结论：腮腺保留式调强放疗对唾液组成、流量及口干情况影响较小,对腮腺分泌功能有显著保护作用。

关键词: 头颈部, 鳞状细胞癌, 调强放疗, 腮腺, 唾液, 口干症

Abstract: PURPOSE: To investigate the changes of salivary composition, flow and dry mouth in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma after parotid sparing modulated radiation therapy. METHODS: One hundred and one patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma who received radiotherapy in Qingyang People's Hospital from May 2016 to November 2018 were selected and divided into intensity modulated radiation group(n=54) and conventional radiation group(n=47) according to different treatment methods. The clinicopathological parameters, parotid uptake index, salivary composition, dry mouth, oropharyngeal symptoms and grading were compared between the two groups. The data were analyzed with SPSS 20.0 software package. RESULTS: The tumor site, TNM stage and differentiation had no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05). The concentration of total protein, secretory IgA, calcium and phosphorus in saliva of patients in intensity modulated radiation therapy group were significantly higher than those in conventional radiation group(P<0.05). The parotid uptake index, secretion index and salivary flow velocity were significantly decreased in both groups(P<0.05), and were significantly lower in the conventional radiation group than in the intensity modulated radiation group(P<0.05). Dry mouth condition in intensity modulated radiation group was significantly better than that in conventional radiation group(P<0.05). After treatment, the ratio of pharyngalgia and dysphagia patients in the intensity modulated radiation group was significantly lower than that in the conventional radiation group(P<0.05). The degree of oropharyngeal grading in the intensity modulated radiation therapy group was significantly better than that in the conventional radiation group(P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The application of parotid sparing retention modulated radiation therapy has little effect on salivary composition, flow rate and dry mouth, and has obvious protective effect on parotid secretion.

Key words: Head and neck, Squamous cell carcinoma, Intensity modulated radiation therapy, Parotid gland, Saliva, Dry mouth

中图分类号:

R739.8

齐鑫, 谢敬生, 王梓欣. 腮腺保留式调强放疗对唾液组成、流量及口干的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(4): 396-399.

QI Xin, XIE Jing-sheng, WANG Zi-xin. Effect of parotid sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy on salivary composition, flow and dry mouth prevention[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2020, 29(4): 396-399.

参考文献

[1] Jöhrens K, Anagnostopoulos I, Dommerich S, et al.Expression patterns of CD168 correlate with the stage and grade of squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck[J]. Mol Clin Oncol, 2017, 6(4): 597-602.
[2] 崔卫娜, 王宝山. ceRNA在头颈部肿瘤中的研究进展[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2018, 32(8): 634-638.
[3] Wichmann G, Cedra S, Schlegel D, et al.Cilengitide and cetuximab reduce cytokine production and colony formation of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells ex vivo[J]. Anticancer Res, 2017, 37(2): 521-527.
[4] 邸斌, 李晓明, 张建军, 等. 头颈部鳞状细胞癌术后放疗控制颈部淋巴结转移的临床病理学影响因素分析[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2016, 51(7): 485-490.
[5] Charalambous A.Seeking optimal management for radioactive iodine therapy-induced adverse effects[J]. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs, 2017, 4(4): 319-322.
[6] 王澎, 孟召伟, 谭建, 等维生素E对术后首次行131I治疗的分化型甲状腺癌患者唾液腺功能的保护作用[J]. 中华核医学与分子影像杂志, 2016, 36(5): 398-401.
[7] Rudat V, Nour A, Hammoud M, et al.Image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy of prostate cancer: analysis of interfractional errors and acute toxicity[J]. Strahlenther Onkol, 2015, 192(2): 109-117.
[8] 王玉斌, 林玉成, 王建化, 等. 勾画颌下腺在鼻咽癌三维调强适形放疗中对患者放疗后口干和生活质量的影响[J]. 中华全科医学, 2018, 16(12): 46-49,63.
[9] 潘洛, 杨光伟, 周怀理. 溶菌酶含片预防放射性口咽反应的临床疗效观察[J]. 肿瘤药学, 2014, 4(4): 294-297.
[10] Eliçin O, Nisa L, Dal Pra A, et al.Up-front neck dissection followed by definitive (chemo)-radiotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: rationale, complications, toxicity rates, and oncological outcomes - A systematic review[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2016, 119(2): 185-193.
[11] 杨静, 孙聚葆, 詹浩辉. 腮腺单发肿块的MRI诊断[J]. 中国医学影像学杂志, 2016, 24(3): 170-174.
[12] 胡彩容, 程燕铭, 张秀春, 等. 调强放疗对保护鼻咽癌患者吞咽结构的剂量学研究[J]. 中国肿瘤, 2016, 25(4): 309-313.
[13] Maske TT, van de Sande FH, Arthur RA, et al. In vitro biofilm models to study dental caries: a systematic review[J]. Biofouling, 2017, 33(8): 661-675.
[14] Katirci G, Ermis RB.Microindentation hardness and calcium/phosphorus ratio of dentin following excavation of dental caries lesions with different techniques[J]. Springerplus, 2016, 5(1):1641.
[15] 王晓丽, 杨柳青, 张遵, 等. 糖皮质激素与龋病相关性的研究[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2016, 32(3): 397-401.
[16] 田甜, 韦智晓, 李俊红, 等.腮腺⁹⁹Tc^mO-₄摄取指数和残留比诊断干燥综合征的价值[J]. 中华核医学与分子影像杂志, 2016, 36(6): 521-524.
[17] 邹惠峰, 沈阳, 尤嘉熙, 等. 唾液腺显像诊断干燥综合征[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2017, 33(3): 399-403.
[18] Dane A, Gurbuz T.Clinical comparative study of the effects of helicobacter pylori colonization on oral health in children[J]. Pak J Med Sci, 2016, 32(4): 969-973.
[19] 王志祥, 石彧, 冯献斌, 等.中医凉血生津法防治鼻咽癌放疗后口腔黏膜损伤疗效观察[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2016, 25(33): 3691-3693.

腮腺保留式调强放疗对唾液组成、流量及口干的影响

Effect of parotid sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy on salivary composition, flow and dry mouth prevention

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	赵娇, 隋佰延, 刘昕, 阮敏. 口腔鳞状细胞癌免疫相关预后风险模型的构建与验证[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(4): 345-353.
[2]	马学花, 徐江, 夏飞飞, 方桃莉, 孙志鹏. 腮腺深叶良性肿瘤：与定位和手术入路相关的分类[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(4): 387-392.
[3]	卞惠惠, 刘瑜, 黄擎, 王艳平, 程东东, 武郭敏. 龋病患儿唾液离子浓度、链球菌、双歧杆菌变化与病情的关联性研究[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(4): 411-414.
[4]	钱叶梅, 王卫红, 朱瑾, 何永静, 许彪, 邹智荣, 施延安, 罗磊, 李静宜. 游离背阔肌皮瓣临床解剖及其在头颈部巨大缺损修复中的应用[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(3): 269-272.
[5]	周辉红, 陈倩倩, 袁方, 孙晶晶, 田臻, 熊屏. 7例头颈部Castleman病超声特征分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(3): 328-331.
[6]	赵开, 张宇宁, 纪帅旗, 刘颖, 姜涵. CFL-1在头颈部鳞癌中的表达与患者预后的关系[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(2): 148-155.
[7]	陈倩倩, 余强, 孙晶晶, 熊屏. 12例Warthin瘤样黏液表皮样癌影像学分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(2): 219-224.
[8]	焦纪兰, 叶心仪, 邓璐, 江辉, 李霄夏, 曾利伟, 谭建国. 不同清洁方法对高透氧化锆粘接强度和表面润湿性的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(1): 36-39.
[9]	黄骏, 韩轩, 马其钊, 邹静. 低龄儿童龋相关口腔微生物特点分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(1): 59-63.
[10]	刘文静, 李梦琦, 崔祥, 汪俊兰. circ_0000326靶向miR-567对口腔鳞状细胞癌HSC3细胞增殖、侵袭及迁移的调控效应[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(6): 590-596.
[11]	陈兴金, 范然怡, 陶识丞, 薛睿, 文旭涛, 麦华明. 颈淋巴清扫术保留胸锁乳突肌与否对晚期口腔鳞癌预后的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(6): 609-614.
[12]	叶婷婷, 陈蔚华, 裴婧, 贾云香, 吴海莹. NEK2与EMT相关分子在口腔鳞状细胞癌中的表达及临床意义[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(6): 640-644.
[13]	丁泰然, 居来提·吐尔逊, 姚志涛, 买买提吐逊·吐尔地. 经口机器人辅助咽后淋巴结清扫术治疗头颈部恶性肿瘤的疗效及预后因素的Cox模型分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(5): 508-512.
[14]	朱文静, 余强, 陶晓峰, 王韶颖, 田涛, 张春叶. 43例小唾液腺癌在多形性腺瘤中的影像学表现[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(3): 255-260.
[15]	王力, 徐睿. 母亲口腔状况对新生儿口腔菌群的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(3): 318-322.