不同清洁方法对高透氧化锆粘接强度和表面润湿性的影响

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2024.01.006

上海口腔医学 ›› 2024, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 36-39.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2024.01.006

不同清洁方法对高透氧化锆粘接强度和表面润湿性的影响

焦纪兰¹, 叶心仪², 邓璐¹, 江辉¹, 李霄夏¹, 曾利伟¹, 谭建国²

1.南昌大学附属口腔医院修复一科,江西省口腔生物医学重点实验室, 江西省口腔疾病临床医学研究中心,江西南昌 330000;
2.北京大学口腔医院修复科,国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心, 口腔数字化医疗技术和材料国家工程实验室,口腔数字医学北京市重点实验室,北京 100081

收稿日期:2022-09-27 修回日期:2022-11-20 出版日期:2024-02-25 发布日期:2024-03-07
通讯作者: 谭建国,E-mail: tanwume@vip.sina.com
作者简介:焦纪兰（1986-）,女,在读博士研究生,主治医师,E-mail:376926006@qq.com
基金资助:
江西省教育厅科学技术研究项目（GJJ200263）

Effect of different cleaning methods on bond strength and surface wettability of high translucency zirconia

JIAO Ji-lan¹, YE Xin-yi², DENG Lu¹, JIANG Hui¹, LI Xiao-xia¹, ZENG Li-wei¹, TAN Jian-guo²

1. First Department of Prosthodontics, Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Nanchang University; Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine; Jiangxi Provincial Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases. Nanchang 330000, Jiangxi Province;
2. Department of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology. Beijing 100081, China

Received:2022-09-27 Revised:2022-11-20 Online:2024-02-25 Published:2024-03-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的: 研究不同清洁方法对唾液污染的高透氧化锆与自粘接树脂水门汀间剪切粘接强度和表面润湿性的影响。方法: 制备80个高透氧化锆试件,随机分为5组(n=16),即对照组(无污染处理)、75%乙醇组、喷砂组、清洁剂组和大气压冷等离子体处理组等。测量表面接触角,测试剪切粘接强度,观察断裂模式。采用SPSS 26.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果: 大气压冷等离子体组的接触角最小(P<0.05);喷砂组、清洁剂组及大气压冷等离子体组的剪切粘接强度与对照组相比,无统计学差异(P>0.05),但均显著大于75%乙醇组(P<0.05);大气压冷等离子体组混合断裂模式增多。结论: 喷砂、清洁剂及大气压冷等离子体清洁唾液污染的高透氧化锆,可获得与未被唾液污染前相当的粘接强度;大气压冷等离子体可显著提高高透氧化锆的表面润湿性。

关键词: 氧化锆, 唾液污染, 大气压冷等离子体, 表面润湿性, 粘接强度

Abstract: PURPOSE: To study the effect of different cleaning methods on the shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cement to saliva-contaminated high translucency zirconia and surface wettability. METHODS: Eighty zirconia specimens were randomly divided into 5 groups (n=16), i.e., control group(not contaminated), 75% ethanol group,cleaning paste group,airborne-particle abrasion group, and atmospheric pressure cold plasma group. The contact angles was measured, shear bond strength were examined, and fracture types were determined. SPSS 26.0 software package was used for statistical analysis of the data. RESULTS: The atmospheric pressure cold plasma group produced the lowest contact angle(P<0.05). The shear bond strength of the airborne-particle abrasion group, the cleaning paste group and the atmospheric pressure cold plasma group respectively were similar to the control group without significant difference(P>0.05), while those were significantly higher than 75% ethanol group(P<0.05). The mixed fracture mode of the atmospheric pressure cold plasma group evidently increased. CONCLUSIONS: Airborne-particle abrasion, cleaning paste and atmospheric pressure cold plasma overcome the effects of saliva contamination, producing the shear bond strength to zirconia similar to the control group. The atmospheric pressure cold plasma improves hydrophilicity of high translucency zirconia significantly.

Key words: Zirconia, Saliva contamination, Atmospheric pressure cold plasma, Surface wettability, Shear bond strength

中图分类号:

R783.1

焦纪兰, 叶心仪, 邓璐, 江辉, 李霄夏, 曾利伟, 谭建国. 不同清洁方法对高透氧化锆粘接强度和表面润湿性的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(1): 36-39.

JIAO Ji-lan, YE Xin-yi, DENG Lu, JIANG Hui, LI Xiao-xia, ZENG Li-wei, TAN Jian-guo. Effect of different cleaning methods on bond strength and surface wettability of high translucency zirconia[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2024, 33(1): 36-39.

参考文献

[1] Ban S.Chemical durability of high translucent dental zirconia[J]. Dent Mater J, 2020, 39(1): 12-23.
[2] Noronha MS, Fronza BM, André CB, et al.Effect of zirconia decontamination protocols on bond strength and surface wettability[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent,2020,32(5):521-529.
[3] Samran A, Al-Ammari A, El Bahra S,et al.Bond strength durability of self-adhesive resin cements to zirconia ceramic: an in vitro study[J].J Prosthet Dent, 2019, 121(3): 477-484.
[4] Ishii R, Tsujimoto A, Takamizawa T,et al.Influence of surface treatment of contaminated zirconia on surface free energy and resincement bonding[J]. Dent Mater J, 2015, 34(1): 91-97.
[5] Takahashi A, Takagaki T, Wada T, et al.The effect of different cleaning agents on saliva contamination for bonding performance of zirconia ceramics[J]. Dent Mater J, 2018, 37(5): 734-739.
[6] Güers P, Wille S, Strunskus T, et al.Durability of resin bonding to zirconia ceramic after contamination and the use of various cleaning methods[J].Dent Mater, 2019, 35(10): 1388-1396.
[7] Piest C, Wille S, Strunskus T, et al.Efficacy of plasma treatment for decontaminating zirconia[J]. J Adhes Dent, 2018, 20(4): 289-297.
[8] Angkasith P, Burgess JO, Bottino MC, et al.Cleaning methods for zirconia following salivary contamination[J]. J Prosthodont, 2016, 25(5): 375-379.
[9] Yoshida K.Influence of cleaning methods on resin bonding to saliva-contaminated zirconia[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2018, 30(3): 259-264.
[10] Inokoshi M, Shimizu H, Zozaki T, et al.Crystallographic and morphological analysis of sandblasted highly translucent dental zirconia[J]. Dent Mater, 2018, 34(3): 508-518.
[11] Singh S, Chandra R, Tripathi S, et al.The bright future of dentistry with cold plasma-review[J]. J Dent Med Sci,2014,13(10):6-13.
[12] 詹凌璐, 张玉玮, 郑苗, 等. 大气压冷等离子体处理提高氧化锆粘接性能[J]. 口腔颌面修复学杂志, 2019, 20(1): 3-8.
[13] Chen J, Cai H, Ren X, et al.A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses[J]. J Prosthodont, 2018, 27(6): 535-543.
[14] Negreiros WM, Ambrosano GMB, Giannini M.Effect of cleaning agent, primer application and their combination on the bond strength of a resin cement to two yttrium-tetragonal zirconia polycrystal zirconia ceramics[J]. Eur J Dent, 2017, 11(1): 6-11.
[15] Borges ALS, Posritong S, Özcan M, et al.Can cleansing regimens effectively eliminate saliva contamination from lithium disilicate ceramic surface?[J].Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, 2017, 25(1): 9-14.
[16] Kim HK, Ahn B.Effect of Al₂0₃ sandblasting particle size on the surface topography and residual compressive stresses of three different dental zirconia grades[J]. Materials(Basel), 2021, 14(3): 610-628.
[17] Yoshida K.Influence of alumina air-abrasion for highly translucent partially stabilized zirconia on flexural strength, surface properties, and bond strength of resin cement[J]. J Appl Oral Sci, 2020, 28: e20190371.
[18] Tabari K, Hosseinpour S, Mohammad-Rahimi H.The impact of plasma treatment of cercon^® zirconia ceramics on adhesion to resin composite cements and surface properties[J]. J Lasers Med Sci, 2017, 8(Suppl 1): S56-S61.
[19] Ito Y, Okawa T, Fukumoto T, et al.Influence of atmospheric pressure low-temperature plasma treatment on the shear bond strength between zirconia and resin cement[J]. J Prosthodont Res, 2016, 60(4): 289-293.
[20] Liu T, Hong L, Hottel T, et al.Non-thermal plasma enhanced bonding of resin cement to zirconia ceramic[J]. Clin Plasma Med, 2016, 4(2): 50-55.
[21] Kim DS, Ahn JJ, Bae EB, et al.Influence of non-thermal atmospheric pressure plasma treatment on shear bond strength between Y-TZP and self-adhesive resin cement[J]. Materials(Basel), 2019, 12(20): 3321-3334.
[22] Ayres AP, Freitas PH, De Munck J, et al.Benefits of nonthermal atmospheric plasma treatment on dentin adhesion[J]. Oper Dent, 2018, 43(6): E288-E299.

不同清洁方法对高透氧化锆粘接强度和表面润湿性的影响

Effect of different cleaning methods on bond strength and surface wettability of high translucency zirconia

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	侯秀秀, 苑克勇, 黄正蔚, 马瑞. Er:YAG激光和Nd:YAG激光辅助的牙漂白对树脂充填体粘接强度和边缘微渗漏的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(4): 351-355.
[2]	梁琢然, 张研楠, 魏萌, 刘敏, 王博, 陈剑锋. 2种酸液热酸蚀对氧化锆表面形貌及粘接强度的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(4): 369-374.
[3]	邹妍, 熊佩文, 朱洪水. 4种氧化锆类全瓷修复体光学性能评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(2): 154-157.
[4]	高琳, 韩祥永, 徐晓明. 不同材料及不同固位深度的髓腔固位冠修复下颌第二磨牙的三维有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(6): 621-624.
[5]	朱红, 魏萌, 刘攀, 袁璐, 张研楠, 陈剑锋. 不同频率铒激光对氧化锆陶瓷粘接性能的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(5): 460-465.
[6]	林后学, 黄静, 孙亚轩, 夏金星. 全氧化锆单牙种植体支持带角度螺钉通道基牙修复短期疗效评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(4): 384-388.
[7]	汪嘉，何智妍，冉淑君，朱来宽. 耐氟变形链球菌对树脂-牙本质粘接强度的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(3): 239-243.
[8]	程竑，董聪，张富强. 摩擦化学法硅涂层对氧化锆陶瓷粘接强度的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(3): 248-251.
[9]	万里扬, 朱洪水. 热碱溶液蚀刻对氧化锆与树脂粘接强度的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2017, 26(6): 590-593.
[10]	许辛夷, 张银莲, 耿芳惠. CAD/CAM氧化锆全瓷冠和金属烤瓷冠的临床应用及对牙周组织影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2017, 26(3): 331-335.
[11]	樊江源, 林婷婷, 胡方旋, 郑瑞斌, 樊帆, 麻健丰. 烧结温度对牙科氧化锆增韧氧化铝陶瓷力学性能的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2017, 26(2): 129-133.
[12]	郭菁, 朱嘉, 柳红光, 朱洪水. 改良液式冲蚀对3Y-TZP氧化锆基底与饰面瓷结合强度的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2017, 26(1): 26-31.
[13]	祁兵, 何艳. 氧化锆全瓷冠修复体40例临床效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2016, 25(3): 364-367.
[14]	王思钱，张大风，郑铁丽，杨静远，林婷婷，麻健丰. 纳米SiO2溶胶对氧化锆基底与饰面瓷结合强度的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2016, 25(2): 141-145.
[15]	董俊超，温黎明，李任，李金源. 不同处理剂对氧化锆与正畸托槽间黏结强度的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2016, 25(2): 177-180.