氟磷灰石玻璃陶瓷、长石质饰瓷与天然牙摩擦磨损性能的研究

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2020.01.004

上海口腔医学 ›› 2020, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 19-24.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2020.01.004

氟磷灰石玻璃陶瓷、长石质饰瓷与天然牙摩擦磨损性能的研究

李云凯¹, 王高琦², 高远¹, 卞翠荣^1,3

1.山东大学口腔医学院,山东济南 250012;
2.济南大学机械工程学院,山东济南 250022;
3.山东大学齐鲁医院口腔修复科,山东济南 250012

收稿日期:2018-08-02 出版日期:2020-02-25 发布日期:2020-03-09
通讯作者: 卞翠荣,E-mail: cuirongB_88@163.com
作者简介:李云凯（1989-）,男,硕士,住院医师,E-mail:xiaokai7209929@qq.com
基金资助:
山东省高等学校科技计划项目(J18KZ002)

Study on the friction and wear properties of fluorapatite glass ceramics, feldspathic porcelain and natural tooth

LI Yun-kai¹, WANG Gao-qi², GAO Yuan¹, BIAN Cui-rong^1,3

1.Department of Prosthodontics, School of Stomatology, Shandong University. Jinan 250012;
2.School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Jinan. Jinan 250022;
3.Department of Prosthodontics, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University. Jinan 250012, Shandong Province, China

Received:2018-08-02 Online:2020-02-25 Published:2020-03-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：研究牙科氟磷灰石玻璃陶瓷、长石质饰瓷与天然牙在干摩擦和唾液润滑条件下的摩擦磨损学性能。方法：制备涂覆IPS-emaxcream和Vita vm9 2种饰面瓷的氧化锆-饰面瓷双层材料试样,尺寸为20 mm×20 mm×4.5 mm,各20个。利用MMV-1摩擦磨损试验机,通过设置不同大小的垂直载荷和转速,分别在干摩擦和唾液润滑条件下,对2种氧化锆-饰面瓷试样进行摩擦磨损试验。采用SPSS 17.0软件包进行单因素方差分析和t检验,确定各组间摩擦系数和磨损量是否存在差异。结果：氟磷灰石玻璃陶瓷在唾液润滑条件下的动态摩擦系数和磨损量显著大于干摩擦条件下的数值;与氟磷灰石玻璃陶瓷相反,长石质饰瓷在干摩擦时的动态摩擦系数和磨损量显著大于在唾液润滑条件下的数值。在干摩擦和唾液润滑条件下,氟磷灰石玻璃陶瓷的磨损量均小于长石质饰瓷。扫描电镜显示,在唾液润滑条件下,氟磷灰石玻璃陶瓷及对应天然牙表现出比干摩擦更为严重的磨损表面。在干摩擦条件下,长石质饰瓷及对应天然牙较氟磷灰石玻璃陶瓷磨损更为严重,在唾液润滑条件下差异较小。结论：与长石质饰瓷相比,氟磷灰石玻璃陶瓷与天然牙在干摩擦条件下表现出更优越的耐磨损性能。加入唾液后,能减少2种饰瓷摩擦磨损性能之间的差异。

关键词: 饰面瓷, 天然牙, 磨损机制, 唾液, 口腔环境

Abstract: PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to observe the friction and wear characteristics of dental fluorapatite glass ceramics, feldspathic porcelain and natural tooth in dry friction and saliva lubrication. METHODS: Two kinds of veneering porcelain (IPS-emaxcream and Vita vm9) coated zirconia-decorative porcelain double-layer material sample were prepared (size 20 mm ×; 20 mm ×; 4.5 mm), each group had 20 specimens. Friction and wear tests were carried out on 2 kinds of zirconia-decorative porcelain sample under dry friction and saliva accompanying environment respectively by setting different sizes of vertical load and sliding frequency using MMV-1 friction and wear testing machine. SPSS 17.0 software package was used for one-way ANOVA and t test to determine whether there were differences in friction coefficient and wear amount between two groups. RESULTS: The dynamic friction coefficient and wear amount of fluorapatite glass ceramics under saliva lubrication condition were significantly greater than those under dry friction condition. On the contrary to fluorapatite glass ceramics, the dynamic friction coefficient and wear amount of feldspathic decorative ceramics under dry friction condition were significantly greater than those under saliva lubrication condition. Under dry friction and saliva lubrication, the wear amount of fluorapatite glass ceramics was significantly smaller than that of feldspathic decorative ceramics. Scanning electron microscopy showed that under saliva lubrication condition, fluorapatite glass ceramics and the corresponding natural teeth had more severe wear surface than dry friction. Under dry friction condition, feldspathic decorative porcelain and corresponding natural teeth wear more seriously than fluorapatite glass ceramic, and the difference in saliva lubrication condition was relatively small. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with feldspathic decorative porcelain, fluorapatite glass ceramics and natural teeth shows superior wear resistance under dry friction condition. The addition of saliva can reduce the difference between the friction and wear performance of the two decorative porcelains.

Key words: Veneering porcelain, Natural tooth, Wear mechanism, Saliva, Oral environment

中图分类号:

R783.1

李云凯, 王高琦, 高远, 卞翠荣. 氟磷灰石玻璃陶瓷、长石质饰瓷与天然牙摩擦磨损性能的研究[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(1): 19-24.

LI Yun-kai, WANG Gao-qi, GAO Yuan, BIAN Cui-rong. Study on the friction and wear properties of fluorapatite glass ceramics, feldspathic porcelain and natural tooth[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2020, 29(1): 19-24.

参考文献

[1] ZR Zhou, J Zheng. Tribology of dental materials: a review[J]. Phys D Appl Phys, 2008, 41(11): 113001.
[2] Heintze SD, Zellweger G, Cavalleri A, et al.Influence of the antagonist material on the wear of different composites using two different wear simulation methods[J]. Dent Mater, 2006, 22(2): 166-175.
[3] Oh WS, Delong R, Anusavice KJ.Factors affecting enamel and ceramic wear: a literature review[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2002, 87(4): 451-459.
[4] Clelland NL, Agarwala V, Knobloch LA, et al.Relative wear of enamel opposing low-fusing dental porcelain[J]. J Prosthodont, 2003, 12(3): 168-175.
[5] Souza JCM, Bentes AC, Reis K, et al.Abrasive and sliding wear of resin composites for dental restorations[J]. Tribol Int, 2016, 102: 154-160.
[6] Al-Hiyasat AS, Saunders WP, Sharkey SW, et al.Investigation of human enamel wear against four dental ceramics and gold[J]. J Dent, 1998, 26(5-6): 487-495.
[7] Preis V, Behr M, Handel G, et al.Wear performance of dental ceramics after grinding and polishing treatments[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2012, 10: 13-22.
[8] 伍丽莎. 齿科修复材料耐磨性及硬度与天然牙的对照分析[J]. 亚太传统医药, 2011, 7(12): 94-95.
[9] Bcuer F, Stimmelmayr M, Gueth JF, et al.In vitro performance of full-contour zirconia single crowns[J]. Dent Mater, 2012, 28(4): 449-456.
[10] 张倩倩, 邱小丽, 高姗姗, 等. 酸性环境下饰面瓷的摩擦磨损行为研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2014, 41(3): 272-276.
[11] 邵文俭, 樊永杰, 李婧, 等. 不同口腔修复材料与天然牙耐磨性能的比较[J]. 中华老年口腔医学杂志, 2013, 11(4): 231-234.
[12] Wassell RW, McCabe J, Walls AWG. Wear rates of regular and tempered composites[J]. J Dent, 1997, 25(1): 49-52.
[13] 王建吉, 刘涛. 载荷、转速、温度对填充PTFE材料摩擦磨损性能影响的研究[J]. 功能材料, 2017, 48(12): 12142-12146.
[14] 严洪海, 黄海蓉, 章卓鸣, 等. 6种不同修复材料与天然牙牙釉质摩擦、磨耗性能的比较[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2007, 16(3): 311-314.
[15] Elmaria A, Goldstein G, Vijayaraghavan T, et al.An evaluation of wear when enamel is opposed by various ceramic materials and gold[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2006, 96(5): 345-353.
[16] 张少锋, 郭嘉文, 田蓓敏, 等. 长石质和氟磷灰石饰瓷在模拟咀嚼循环条件下耐磨性能的研究[J]. 牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志, 2015, 25(2): 84-89,124.

氟磷灰石玻璃陶瓷、长石质饰瓷与天然牙摩擦磨损性能的研究

Study on the friction and wear properties of fluorapatite glass ceramics, feldspathic porcelain and natural tooth

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	卞惠惠, 刘瑜, 黄擎, 王艳平, 程东东, 武郭敏. 龋病患儿唾液离子浓度、链球菌、双歧杆菌变化与病情的关联性研究[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(4): 411-414.
[2]	焦纪兰, 叶心仪, 邓璐, 江辉, 李霄夏, 曾利伟, 谭建国. 不同清洁方法对高透氧化锆粘接强度和表面润湿性的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(1): 36-39.
[3]	黄骏, 韩轩, 马其钊, 邹静. 低龄儿童龋相关口腔微生物特点分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(1): 59-63.
[4]	朱文静, 余强, 陶晓峰, 王韶颖, 田涛, 张春叶. 43例小唾液腺癌在多形性腺瘤中的影像学表现[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(3): 255-260.
[5]	王力, 徐睿. 母亲口腔状况对新生儿口腔菌群的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(3): 318-322.
[6]	白晗, 刘涵, 朱蕾, 刘超, 李楠, 肖晶. POLQ表达降低对SACC-83细胞DNA损伤敏感性的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(2): 120-125.
[7]	杜洪亮, 何等旗, 王佳俐, 车银富, 闫庆涵. 姜黄素调控唾液腺肿瘤细胞增殖和凋亡的机制探讨[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(5): 483-490.
[8]	吕欢, 熊屏, 张蔚蒨, 龚霞, 李佳, 丁昂昂. 多模态超声对唾液腺肿瘤的鉴别诊断价值评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(4): 384-388.
[9]	段咏华, 俞敏, 潘亮, 林华俊, 郭美玲. 单纯种植体与天然牙联合种植体的临床修复效果及影响因素分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(1): 84-88.
[10]	高洁, 姜雅萍, 马康傑, 赵保东, 邓婧. PRRX1对唾液腺腺样囊性癌细胞自噬的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(5): 477-480.
[11]	齐鑫, 谢敬生, 王梓欣. 腮腺保留式调强放疗对唾液组成、流量及口干的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(4): 396-399.
[12]	王智明，王星翱，张世坤，王喜中，王丽，张新悦，刘楠楠，唐颜颜. Dnmt1和Dnmt3b在唾液腺黏液表皮样癌中的表达及意义[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(3): 275-279.
[13]	徐睿, 俞明, 李月玲. 唾液腺黏液表皮样癌干细胞的分离、鉴定及生物学特征分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(1): 39-42.
[14]	朱亚萍, 郭建青. 口腔科患者唾液乙型肝炎病毒检测分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2017, 26(5): 549-552.
[15]	孟雪, 齐晓宇, 王秋旭, 刘维贤. HBXIP对腺样囊性癌细胞株ACC-M生物学功能及PI3K/Akt信号通路的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2017, 26(4): 389-394.