摩擦化学法硅涂层对氧化锆陶瓷粘接强度的影响

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2018.03.006

上海口腔医学 ›› 2018, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (3): 248-251.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2018.03.006

摩擦化学法硅涂层对氧化锆陶瓷粘接强度的影响

程竑¹，董聪¹，张富强²

1.上海市口腔病防治院口腔修复科，上海 200001；
2.上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院·口腔医学院口腔修复科，上海 200011

收稿日期:2018-02-14 修回日期:2018-05-01 出版日期:2018-07-20 发布日期:2018-07-20
通讯作者: 张富强，E-mail：fqzhang@vip.163.com
作者简介:程竑（1969-），男，硕士，教授，主任医师，E-mail:hongcheng899@163.com

Influence of tribochemical silica coating on shear bond strength of a dental zirconia ceramic to resin cements

CHENG Hong¹, DONG Cong¹, ZHANG Fu-qiang².

1.Department of Prosthodontics, Shanghai Stomatological Disease Center. Shanghai 200001；
2.Department of Prosthodontics, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. Shanghai 200011,China

Received:2018-02-14 Revised:2018-05-01 Online:2018-07-20 Published:2018-07-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的： 评估摩擦化学法硅涂层对氧化锆陶瓷粘接强度的影响。方法： 将切割烧结后的Lava氧化锆瓷块60件分为6组，每2组分别经喷砂/硅烷偶联剂、喷砂/CoJet Sand/硅烷偶联剂、无处理3种表面处理后，相同表面处理的2组中，每组分别用RelyX Unicem或Panavia F2.0与牙釉质粘接。各组随机抽取5件共30件进行24 h水浴，其余30件进行5000周水热循环，然后进行剪切粘接强度测试。采用SPSS 23.0软件包对数据进行双因素方差分析、Tukey HSD多重比较法及t检验。结果： 喷砂/CoJet/硅烷组的剪切强度均显著高于其他2组（P<0.001）；经老化试验后，喷砂/CoJet/硅烷组使用RelyX Unicem仍保持较高的剪切强度[(21.374±4.433)MPa]，与其他各组相比有显著差异（P<0.001）。结论： 摩擦化学法硅涂层能够有效提高氧化锆的粘接强度及耐久性，表面处理方式与粘接剂之间的相互作用需得到临床关注。

关键词: 氧化锆, 粘接强度, CoJet, 表面处理

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of tribochemical silica coating for zirconia bonding. METHODS: Sixty cut and fully sintered Lava frame zirconia blocks were randomly divided into 6 groups and subjected to 3 different surface treatments and 2 kinds of resin cement.The surface treatments were airborne-particle abrasion/silane, airborne-particle abrasion/CoJet Sand (tribochemical silica coating) /silane and no treatment(control), resin cements were RelyX Unicem and Panavia F2.0. Half of the specimens in each group were randomly chosen and stored in 37℃ distilled water for 24h, the others were thermocycled (5℃ and 55℃) for 5000 cycles. All specimens were subjected to shear bond strength(SBS) testing. SBS values were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and t test, and multiple pairwise comparisons were then completed with post hoc Tukey test. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS23.0 software package for Windows. RESULTS: Airborne-particle abrasion/CoJet sand/silane group resulted in a significantly higher SBS than those in other groups (P<0.001). After thermocycling, the bond strengths in the airborne-particle abrasion/CoJet Sand/silane groups bonded with RelyX Unicem showed no significantly decrease while marked drop appeared in all other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Combination of tribochemical silica coating with silane coupling can effectively enforce the bond strengths of zirconia (Y-TZP). Attention should be paid to the interaction between surface treatments and resin cements.

Key words: Zirconia, Bonding strength, CoJet, Surface treatment

中图分类号:

R783.3

程竑，董聪，张富强. 摩擦化学法硅涂层对氧化锆陶瓷粘接强度的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(3): 248-251.

CHENG Hong, DONG Cong, ZHANG Fu-qiang.. Influence of tribochemical silica coating on shear bond strength of a dental zirconia ceramic to resin cements[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2018, 27(3): 248-251.

参考文献

[1] Kitayama S, Nikaido T, Takahashi R, et al. Effect of primer treatment on bonding of resin cements to zirconia ceramic [J]. Dent Mater, 2010, 26(5): 426-432.
[2] Tzanakakis EG, Tzoutzas IG, Koidis PT. Is there a potential for durable adhesion to zirconia restorations? A systematic review [J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2016, 115(1): 9-19.
[3] Aboushelib MN. Evaluation of zirconia/resin bond strength and interface quality using a new technique[J]. J Adhes Dent, 2011, 13(3): 255-260.
[4] Chen L, Suh BI, Kim J, et al. Evaluation of silica-coating technique for zirconia bonding [J]. Am J Dent, 2011, 24(2): 79-84.
[5] Ishii R, Tsujimoto A, Takamizawa T, et al. Influence of surface treatment of contaminated zirconia on surface free energy and resin cement bonding [J]. Dent Mater J, 2015, 34(1): 91-97.
[6] Anand S, Ebenezar AV, Anand N, et al. Microshear bond strength evaluation of surface pretreated zirconia ceramics bonded to dentin [J]. Eur J Dent, 2015, 9(2): 224-227.
[7] Zcan M, Volpato CAM. Adhesion to zirconia dioxide used for dental reconstructions: surface conditioning concepts, challenges and future prospects[J]. Curr Oral Health Rep, 2015, 2(4):190-194.
[8] Pilo R, Kaitsas V, Zinelis S, et al. Interaction of zirconia primers with yttria-stabilized zirconia surfaces[J]. Dent Mater, 2016, 32(3): 353-362.
[9] Mahmoodi N, Hooshmand T, Heidari S, et al. Effect of sandblasting, silica coating and laser treatment on the microtensile bond strenth of a dental zirconia ceramic to resin cements [J]. Lasers Med Sci, 2016, 31(2): 205-211.
[10] Hallmann L, UlmerP, WilleS, et al. Effect of surface treatments on the properties and morphological change of dental zirconia [J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2015, 115(3): 341-349.
[11] Dbradovic-Djuricic K, Medic V, Dodic S, et al. Dilmmas in zirconia bonding: A review [J]. Srp Arh Celok Lek, 2013, 141(6): 395-401.
[12] Bladissara P, Querzè M, Monaco C, et al. Efficacy of surface treatments on the bond strength of resin cements to two brands of zirconia ceramic [J]. J Adhes Dent, 2013, 15(3): 259-267.
[13] Chen C, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Effect of an experimental zirconia-silica coating technique on micro tensile bond strength of zirconia in different priming conditions [J]. Dent Mater, 2012, 28(8): e127-134.
[14] Fernandes VV Jr, Rodrigues JR, da Silva JM, et al. Bond strength of a self-adhesive resin cement to enamel and dentin [J]. Int J Esthet Dent, 2015, 10(1): 146-156.
[15] Oyague RC, Monticelli F, Toledano M, et al. Effect of water aging on microtensile bond strength of dual-cured resin cements to pre-treated sintered zirconium-oxide ceramics [J]. Dent Mater, 2009, 25(3): 392-399.
[16] Piwowarczyk A, Lauer HC, Sorensen JA. Theshear bond strength between luting cements and zirconia ceramics after two pre-treatments [J]. Oper Dent, 2005, 30(3): 382-388.
[17] Xie H, Li Q, Zhang F, et al. Comparison of resin bonding improvements to zirconia between one-bottle universal adhesives and tribochemical silica coating,which is better? [J]. Dent Mater, 2016, 32(3): 403-411.

摩擦化学法硅涂层对氧化锆陶瓷粘接强度的影响

Influence of tribochemical silica coating on shear bond strength of a dental zirconia ceramic to resin cements

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	焦纪兰, 叶心仪, 邓璐, 江辉, 李霄夏, 曾利伟, 谭建国. 不同清洁方法对高透氧化锆粘接强度和表面润湿性的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(1): 36-39.
[2]	侯秀秀, 苑克勇, 黄正蔚, 马瑞. Er:YAG激光和Nd:YAG激光辅助的牙漂白对树脂充填体粘接强度和边缘微渗漏的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(4): 351-355.
[3]	梁琢然, 张研楠, 魏萌, 刘敏, 王博, 陈剑锋. 2种酸液热酸蚀对氧化锆表面形貌及粘接强度的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(4): 369-374.
[4]	邹妍, 熊佩文, 朱洪水. 4种氧化锆类全瓷修复体光学性能评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(2): 154-157.
[5]	高琳, 韩祥永, 徐晓明. 不同材料及不同固位深度的髓腔固位冠修复下颌第二磨牙的三维有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(6): 621-624.
[6]	朱红, 魏萌, 刘攀, 袁璐, 张研楠, 陈剑锋. 不同频率铒激光对氧化锆陶瓷粘接性能的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(5): 460-465.
[7]	林后学, 黄静, 孙亚轩, 夏金星. 全氧化锆单牙种植体支持带角度螺钉通道基牙修复短期疗效评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(4): 384-388.
[8]	李苑荟, 邢孔才, 王怡婷, 陶巍, 杨超. 不同表面处理方法在纳米混合树脂复合材料修复中的应用[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(6): 591-595.
[9]	汪嘉，何智妍，冉淑君，朱来宽. 耐氟变形链球菌对树脂-牙本质粘接强度的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(3): 239-243.
[10]	万里扬, 朱洪水. 热碱溶液蚀刻对氧化锆与树脂粘接强度的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2017, 26(6): 590-593.
[11]	许辛夷, 张银莲, 耿芳惠. CAD/CAM氧化锆全瓷冠和金属烤瓷冠的临床应用及对牙周组织影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2017, 26(3): 331-335.
[12]	樊江源, 林婷婷, 胡方旋, 郑瑞斌, 樊帆, 麻健丰. 烧结温度对牙科氧化锆增韧氧化铝陶瓷力学性能的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2017, 26(2): 129-133.
[13]	郭菁, 朱嘉, 柳红光, 朱洪水. 改良液式冲蚀对3Y-TZP氧化锆基底与饰面瓷结合强度的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2017, 26(1): 26-31.
[14]	祁兵, 何艳. 氧化锆全瓷冠修复体40例临床效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2016, 25(3): 364-367.
[15]	王思钱，张大风，郑铁丽，杨静远，林婷婷，麻健丰. 纳米SiO2溶胶对氧化锆基底与饰面瓷结合强度的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2016, 25(2): 141-145.