不同大小MO洞型复合树脂嵌体修复应力分布的有限元分析

上海口腔医学 ›› 2015, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (2): 170-176.

不同大小MO洞型复合树脂嵌体修复应力分布的有限元分析

张珑¹,逯宜²,杨柏松³,郭妍⁴,李芳萍⁵

1.西安交通大学医学院第一附属医院口腔科,陕西西安 710061;
2.西安交通大学医学院附属口腔医院修复科,陕西西安 710004;
3.西安交通大学机械工程学院,陕西西安 710049;
4.西安交通大学医学院护理系,陕西西安 710061;
5.西安交通大学医学院第一附属医院门诊部,陕西西安 710061

收稿日期:2014-06-15 出版日期:2015-04-20 发布日期:2015-07-24
通讯作者: 张珑,Tel：029-85324156,E-mail:longz.zl@qq.com
作者简介:张珑(1964-),女,硕士,副主任医师
基金资助:
西安市科技计划项目基金[SF1023(6)]

The finite element analysis of stress distribution in different size of MO cavities restored with composite resin inlays

ZHANG Long¹,LU Yi²,YANG Bo-song³,GUO Yan⁴,LI Fang-ping⁵

1.Department of Stomatology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University. Xi’an 710061;
2.Department of Prosthetics, the Affiliated Stomatological Hospital, Medical School of Xi’an Jiaotong University. Xi’an 710004;
3.College of Mechanical Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University. Xi’an 710049;
4.Department of Nursing, Medical School of Xi’an Jiaotong University. Xi’an 710061;
5.Department of Outpatient, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University. Xi’an 710061,Shaanxi Province, China

Received:2014-06-15 Online:2015-04-20 Published:2015-07-24
Supported by:
Science and Technology Planning Fund of Xi’an City [SF1023(6)]

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨复合树脂嵌体修复后,近中邻（meiso-occlusal,MO）洞型面深度及宽度变化对牙体抗力的影响。方法采用锥形束CT（cone beam computed tomography,CBCT）扫描,结合Mimics、Geomagic Studio逆向工程等软件,建立不同大小邻（II类）MO洞型树脂嵌体修复的三维有限元模型,用ANSYS Workbench软件网格划分并求解分析各模型内部牙体及嵌体在垂直、舌向45°加载下主应力峰值及Von-mises应力分布情况。结果大小不同的MO洞型以复合树脂嵌体修复时,龈壁对应处是嵌体的主要应力所在,洞底部近髓腔处是牙体的主要应力集中区。随着面洞型深度、宽度增加,牙体、修复体的最大应力峰值及Von-mises应力集中区分布范围加大;牙体Von-mises应力受洞型宽度的影响更大,嵌体的Von-mises应力受洞型深度增加影响更大。侧向加载大大增加了牙体和修复体的应力峰值。结论MO洞型以树脂嵌体修复后,洞深、洞宽度加大及侧向加载增加了牙体与嵌体的应力峰值,改变了应力集中区分布范围。

关键词: 近中邻（II类）洞, 复合树脂嵌体, 应力, 有限元分析

Abstract: PURPOSE: To explore the effect of different depth and width of meiso-occlusal (Class Ⅱ) cavity type on the tooth tissue resistance stress after restoration with composite resin inlays. METHODS: The 3-D finite element model of mandibular first molar with meiso-occlusal (ClassⅡ) cavity restored with composite resin inlay was established by using CBCT scanning and reverse engineering software Mimics, Geomagic Studio, and finite element analysis software ANSYS. Comparative analysis of restoration with different depth and width meiso-occlusal (ClassⅡ) cavity under the same load of perpendicular and 45° deviation was explored, and finally the main stress and Von-mises stress changed as well as stress distribution were analyzed. RESULTS: The main stress was located in the gingival wall opposite to the inlay, while the major stress concentration area of the tooth was distributed near the canal at the bottom of the cavity. With the increase of the depth and width, the main stress and Von-mises stress distribution areas of tooth were getting larger. The Von-mises stress of tooth was influenced by the width variation of the cavity, while that depth change of cavity was affected by Von Mises stress of the inlay. CONCLUSIONS: With the increase of the depth and width of the cavity as well as lateral loading force, the peak stress of tooth with inlays increased and the distribution of stress concentration is modified after meiso-occlusal (ClassⅡ) cavity being inlayed with composite resin.

Key words: Meiso-occlusal (ClassⅡ) cavity, Composite resin inlay, Stress, Finite element analysis

中图分类号:

R781.05

张珑,逯宜,杨柏松,郭妍,李芳萍. 不同大小MO洞型复合树脂嵌体修复应力分布的有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2015, 24(2): 170-176.

ZHANG Long,LU Yi,YANG Bo-song,GUO Yan,LI Fang-ping. The finite element analysis of stress distribution in different size of MO cavities restored with composite resin inlays[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2015, 24(2): 170-176.

参考文献

[1] Lin CL, Chnag CH, Ko CC. Multifactorial analysis of an MOD restored human premolar using auto-mesh finite element approach [J]. J Oral Rehbail, 2001, 28(6): 576-585.
[2] Khera SC, Goel VK, Chen RC, et al. Parameters of MOD cavity preparations: a 3-D FEM study, part Ⅱ[J]. Oper Dent, 1991, 16(2): 42-54.
[3] 张珑, 逯宜, 杨柏松. CBCT扫描结合逆向工程软件建立邻嵌体洞型三维有限元模型研究[J].中国美容医学, 2011, 20(10): 1562-1565.
[4] 赵依民. 口腔修复学[M]. 第6版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2008: 91-92.
[5] 皮昕. 口腔解剖生理学[M]. 第6版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2007: 41-294.
[6] Jiang W, Bo H, Yongchun G, et al. Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a three-dimensional finite element analysis[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2010, 103(1): 6-12.
[7] 巢永烈. 口腔修复学 [M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2011: 160-161
[8] Blaser PK, Lund MR, Cochran MA, et al. Effect of designs of Class 2 preparations on resistance of teeth of fracture [J]. Oper Dent, 1983, 8(1): 6-10.
[9] Sheth JJ, Fuller JL, Jensen ME. Cuspal deformation and fracture resistance of teeth with dentin adhesives and composites [J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1988, 60(4): 560-569.
[10] Collins CJ, Bryan RW, Hodge KL. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8-year findings [J]. J Dent, 1998, 26(4): 311-317.
[11] Manhart J, Chen HY, Neuerer P, et al. Three-year clinical evaluation of composite and ceramic inlays [J]. Am J Dent,2001,14(2):95-99.
[12] Peters MC, deVree JH, Brekelmans WA. Distributed crack analysis of ceramic inlays [J]. J Dent Res, 1993, 72(11): 1537-1542.
[13] 梅蕾, 陈亚明, 孙亚洲, 等. 不同洞型嵌体有限元模型的建立及应力分布初步探讨 [J].口腔医学, 2006, 26(2): 94-96.
[14] Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Pintado MR, et al. Residual shrinkage stress distributions in molars after composite restoration [J]. Dent Mater, 2004, 20(6): 554-564.

[1]	陈精诚, 赵梦丽, 程志恒, 刘昕. 隐形矫治器上前牙内收过程中侧切牙不同附件设计的三维有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(4): 360-366.
[2]	韩祥永, 鞠雅琼, 张琳琳, 田芝娟. 聚醚醚酮用于上颌牙列缺失种植固定修复桥架的三维有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(4): 367-372.
[3]	欧晓丽, 方志欣, 龙智灵, 罗海欧, 唐倩. 无托槽隐形矫治器内收前牙时后牙移动趋势及牙周膜应力分布[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(3): 239-244.
[4]	毛懿, 陈旭卓, 覃海艺, 甄锦泽, 邱亚汀, 霍亮, 张善勇. 双侧冠突切除对肋骨-肋软骨移植重建颞下颌关节受力影响的有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(2): 126-131.
[5]	高远, 陈杰, 王高琦, 李云凯, 卞翠荣. 种植体-基台连接设计对基台与基台螺丝受力影响的三维有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(5): 481-487.
[6]	姜莉萍, 唐镇. 正畸应力变化下牙龈组织α-SMA、Ⅰ型和Ⅲ型胶原变化及龈沟液MMP-2、TIMP-2的表达[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(4): 402-405.
[7]	邱晓键, 肖善社, 谷雪莲, 朱来宽, 蒋倩. 不同锥度根管锉对根管壁抗折强度的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(5): 471-475.
[8]	左书玉, 王璇, 吴海威, 张东升. 不同种植体外形设计对上颌窦提升术后种植体周围应力分布的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(4): 355-358.
[9]	田一弘, 刘美希, 张强, 夏晨蕾, 阎潇, 袁晓. 周期性机械应力诱导的自噬抑制caspase通路依赖的成肌细胞凋亡[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(3): 231-236.
[10]	韩婧, 解东平, 王慧珊, 周子疌, 刘剑楠. 微型钛板与生物可吸收板在下颌骨骨切开术固定中的应力比较[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(3): 237-241.
[11]	洪煜锐, 李阳, 骆伟燕, 肖丽娟, 高永波. 树脂陶瓷复合材料单冠美学区种植修复的三维有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(3): 262-266.
[12]	嵇国平, 田一宏, 刘美希, 沈莹, 沈刚. 内质网应激关键因子PREK在应力加载下成肌细胞凋亡中的作用及机制[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(3): 259-263.
[13]	王诗哲, 潘晓岗, 周可拓. 拔牙病例隐形矫治器设计的有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(3): 264-267.
[14]	朱远兵, 赖光云, 汪俊. 外力方向对防护牙托性能影响的有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(6): 574-578.
[15]	顾美珍, 徐宏鸣, 陈芳, 李晓艳, 蒋钰钢, 李克勇. 不完全腭裂咽腔三维有限元模型的建立[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(6): 591-595.