上海口腔医学

上海口腔医学 ›› 2020, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 445-448.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2020.04.023

• 口腔医学教育 • 上一篇    

硅橡胶印模与口内扫描印模在口腔临床教学中的比较

刘晶1, 孙潇帅2, 张若彤2, 王宝1, 邬春兰1, 叶丽娟1,*, 于德栋1   

  1. 1.上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院·口腔医学院 口腔第二门诊部,国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心,上海市口腔医学重点实验室,上海市口腔医学研究所,上海 201999;
    2.安徽医科大学口腔医学院,安徽省口腔疾病研究重点实验室,安徽 合肥 230032
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-01 修回日期:2020-01-19 出版日期:2020-08-25 发布日期:2020-09-11
  • 通讯作者: 叶丽娟,E-mail:18801790090@163.com;于德栋,E-mail:107176862@qq.com。*共同通信作者
  • 作者简介:刘晶（1982-）,女,硕士,主治医师,E-mail:lj3232475@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    上海交通大学医工交叉项目（YG2017QN12,YG2017QN11）; 上海第九人民医院院级教学项目(JYJX03201812,JYJX03201905,JYJX03201903)

A comparative study of silicon rubber impression and intraoral scanning impression in oral clinical teaching

LIU Jing1, SUN Xiao-shuai2, ZHANG Ruo-tong2, WANG Bao1, WU Chun-lan1, YE Li-juan1, YU De-dong1   

  1. 1. Second Dental Center, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology & Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology. Shanghai 201999;
    2. College & Hospital of Stomatology Anhui Medical University, Key Lab. of Oral Diseases Research of Anhui Province. Hefei 230032, Anhui Province, China
  • Received:2019-07-01 Revised:2020-01-19 Online:2020-08-25 Published:2020-09-11

PDF (PC)

238

摘要： 目的：通过本科实习医师制取硅橡胶印模及数字化口内扫描印模的教学实践,对比2种取模方式的操作时间、学习的难易程度和患者的接受程度等。方法：6名本科实习医师分别作为医师和患者进行取模练习,由专人记录操作时间,并用视觉模拟量表（VAS）记录患者满意度。采用SPSS 23.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果：在取模时间、学习总时间、总体舒适度方面,硅橡胶印模优于口内扫描印模,两者之间有显著差异(P<0.05)。结论：采用硅橡胶取模,患者的就诊体验更好。采用口内扫描印模技术,需要医师具有更熟练的操作技能。应用角色扮演的方式,实习医师可以更好地学习到不同取模方式的操作要点及注意事项。

关键词: 硅橡胶印模, 口内扫描印模, 教学方法

Abstract: PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess and compare patient satisfaction and time required between silicon rubber impression and intraoral scanning impression. METHODS: Six undergraduates participated in this study. silicon rubber impression and intraoral scanning impression were taken, the time required to obtain the impressions and the scores of visual analog scale(VAS) were recorded. SPSS 23.0 software package was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The time and patients satisfaction of silicon rubber impression were better than intraoral scanning impressions, and there were significant differences between the two groups(P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Using silicon rubber impression, the patient experience is better. To use intraoral scanning impression technology, dentists should be more skilled. With the role-playing method,dental interns can learn the operation key points and precautions of different impression-taking methods even better.

Key words: Silicon rubber impression, Intraoral scanning impressions, Teaching methods

中图分类号: