杜仲胶复合义齿软衬材料的研制及细胞毒性检测

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2019.04.008

上海口腔医学 ›› 2019, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (4): 378-383.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2019.04.008

杜仲胶复合义齿软衬材料的研制及细胞毒性检测

罗恒^1,2, 高海¹, 许雪飞³, 冯云枝²

1.南方医科大学口腔医院口腔修复科,广东广州 510280;
2.中南大学湘雅二医院口腔中心,湖南长沙 410011;
3.广州医科大学附属第二医院药学部,广东广州 510220

收稿日期:2018-06-07 修回日期:2018-11-06 出版日期:2019-08-25 发布日期:2019-09-23
通讯作者: 冯云枝,E-mail:fyz660303@163.com
作者简介:罗恒（1985-）,男,硕士,主治医师,E-mail:fuziluo@163.com
基金资助:
广东省医学科研基金（B2019175）

Preliminary development and cytotoxicity of Eucommia ulmoides gum composite soft denture liner

LUO Heng^1,2, GAO Hai¹, XU Xue-fei³, FENG Yun-zhi²

1. Department of Prosthodontics, Stomatological Hospital, Southern Medical University. Guangzhou 510280, Guangdong Province;
2. Department of Stomatology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University. Changsha 410011, Hunan Province;
3. Department of Pharmacy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University. Guangzhou 510220, Guangdong Province, China

Received:2018-06-07 Revised:2018-11-06 Online:2019-08-25 Published:2019-09-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的利用杜仲胶的优良特性,制备高弹性杜仲胶复合义齿软衬材料,检测其相关物理学性能和细胞毒性,探讨用于临床的可能性。方法参考现有弹性杜仲胶配方和医用橡胶配方,以硬度、拉伸强度和断裂伸长率为力学性能观察指标,确定材料各主要成分的种类和用量,制备杜仲胶复合义齿软衬材料。应用四甲基偶氮唑蓝（MTT）方法,检测和比较各组杜仲胶复合义齿软衬材料、丙烯酸自凝软衬材料和Silagum硅橡胶义齿软衬材料的50%浸提液对体外培养细胞L929的毒性作用,采用SPSS 16.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果橡胶基质的种类和加入共混比例对杜仲胶复合义齿软衬材料的力学性能有显著影响,加入杜仲胶显著提高了顺丁橡胶的生胶强度,硬度、拉伸强度和断裂伸长率随之升高。MTT检测结果显示,各组杜仲胶复合义齿软衬材料对L929细胞无毒性,与丙烯酸自凝软衬材料和Silagum硅橡胶义齿软衬材料相比,5组杜仲胶复合义齿软衬材料在2、4、7 d时的毒性级别基本维持在1级,仅70:30组在7 d时达到2级。Silagum硅橡胶软衬材料和各组杜仲胶复合义齿软衬材料在2、4、7 d时的细胞相对增殖率均显著高于同等条件下的丙烯酸自凝软衬材料（P<0.05）。结论杜仲胶与顺丁橡胶共混比例为70:30时,适量添加氧化锌、氧化镁、硬脂酸、升华硫、促进剂CZ、防老剂,可制备出力学性能适宜的高弹性杜仲胶复合义齿软衬材料。杜仲胶复合义齿软衬材料对体外培养的小鼠成纤维细胞L929无毒性,初步认为其生物相容性良好。

关键词: 杜仲胶, 软衬材料, 力学性能, 细胞毒性

Abstract: PURPOSE: To prepare a soft lining material with high elastic on the basis of excellent characteristics of Eucommia ulmoides gum, and explore its basic physical performance and cytotoxity. METHODS: Basic formula was used based on the existing formula of elastic Eucommia ulmoides gum and medical rubber, then hardness, tensile strength and elongation at break were investigated to determine the final formula of the material, named Eucommia ulmoides gum composite soft denture liner. L929 mouse fibroblasts cultured in vitro were used to detect the toxic effects of 50% of leaching solution released from three kinds of denture soft lining materials by MTT assay. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS16.0 software package. RESULTS: The kinds and blending proportion of rubber matrix had significant impact on mechanical properties of Eucommia ulmoides gum composite soft denture liner, the addition of Eucommia ulmoides gum significantly increased the hardness, tensile strength and elongation at break of the butadiene rubber. MTT assay showed Eucommia ulmoides gum composite soft denture liner did not have cytotoxicity on L929 mouse fibroblasts. The toxicity levels of 5 groups of Eucommia ulmoides gum composite soft denture liner in the 2nd, 4th, 7th day were maintained in the first stage, only 70:30 group reached the second stage on the 7th day. The cell relative appreciation rate of Silagum and 5 groups of Eucommia ulmoides gum composite soft denture liner in 2nd, 4th, 7th day were significantly higher than that in the self-curing acrylic soft lining material (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Eucommia ulmoides gum and butadiene rubber blend ratio of 70:30, adding appropriate amount of zinc oxide, magnesium, stearic acid, sublimed sulfur, CZ, antioxidants, can get optimum mechanical properties. Eucommia ulmoides gum composite soft denture liner has no effect on L929 fibroblasts proliferation, indicating good biocompatibility.

Key words: Eucommia ulmoides gum, Soft denture liner, Mechanical properties, Cytotoxicity

中图分类号:

R783.1

罗恒, 高海, 许雪飞, 冯云枝. 杜仲胶复合义齿软衬材料的研制及细胞毒性检测[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(4): 378-383.

LUO Heng, GAO Hai, XU Xue-fei, FENG Yun-zhi. Preliminary development and cytotoxicity of Eucommia ulmoides gum composite soft denture liner[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2019, 28(4): 378-383.

参考文献

[1] 张继川, 薛兆弘, 严瑞芳, 等. 天然高分子材料—杜仲胶的研究进展[J]. 高分子学报, 2011, 55(10): 1105-1117.
[2] 付文, 刘安华, 王丽. 杜仲胶的提取与应用研究进展[J]. 弹性体, 2014, 24(5): 76-80.
[3] 冯志博, 张继川, 张天鑫, 等. 杜仲橡胶的研究现状与发展前景[J]. 橡胶工业, 2017, 64(10): 630-635.
[4] 马娟, 林永慧, 刘彪, 等. 我国杜仲胶的发展现状与展望[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2012, 40(6): 3396-3398.
[5] Tsai TH, Tsai TH, Chien YC, et al.In vitro, antimicrobial activities against cariogenic streptococci and their antioxidant capacities: A comparative study of green tea versus different herbs[J]. Food Chem, 2008, 110(4): 859-864.
[6] 宁永刚, 王琎, 康海澜, 等. 不同温度下杜仲胶/天然橡胶共混硫化胶性能研究[J]. 弹性体, 2018, 28(1): 30-34.
[7] 张蕊, 张洵箐, 杨凤, 等. 杜仲胶改性高聚物的研究进展[J]. 高分子通报, 2015, 28(8): 63-68.
[8] 严瑞芳, 胡汉杰. 杜仲胶的研究与开发[J]. 中国科学基金, 1994, 8(1): 51-55.
[9] 辛振祥, 张殿荣. 现代橡胶配方设计[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2001.
[10] Hashem MI.Advances in soft denture liners: An update[J]. J Contemp Dent Pract, 2015, 16(4): 314-318.
[11] McCabe JF, Carrick TE, Kamohara H. Adhesive bond strength and compliance for denture soft lining materials[J]. Biomaterials, 2002, 23(5): 1347-1352.
[12] Salloum AM.Effect of aging on bond strength of two soft lining materials to a denture base polymer[J]. J Indian Prosthodont Soc, 2014, 14(Suppl 1): 155-160.
[13] Mutluay MM, Ruyter IE.Evaluation of bond strength of soft relining materials to denture base polymers[J]. Dent Mater, 2007, 23(11): 1373-1381.
[14] Chladek G, Kasperski J, Barszczewska-Rybarek I, et al.Sorption, solubility, bond strength and hardness of denture soft lining incorporated with silver nanoparticles[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2012, 14(1): 563-574.
[15] 黄晶晶. 使用微波进行义齿消毒的研究进展[J]. 口腔疾病防治, 2017, 25(4): 266-269.
[16] Dorocka-Bobkowska B, Medyński D, Pryliński M, et al.Recent advances in tissue conditioners for prosthetic treatment. A review[J]. Adv Clin Exp Med, 2017, 26(4): 723-728.
[17] Sánchez-Aliaga A, Pellissari CV, Arrais CA, et al.Peel bond strength of soft lining materials with antifungal to a denture base acrylic resin[J]. Dent Mater J, 2016, 35(2):194-203.
[18] Saravanan M, Kumar A, Padmanabhan TV, et al.Viscoelastic properties and antimicrobial effects of soft liners with silver zeolite in complete dental prosthesis wearers: an in vivo study[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2015, 28(3): 265-269.
[19] 刘祥, 刘淑瑛, 虎娟, 等. 超声波辅助3种溶剂分析测定杜仲胶含量[J]. 热带作物学报, 2017, 38(4): 723-727.
[20] 石飞飞, 夏琳, 辛振祥. 杜仲胶/聚丁二酸丁二醇酯复合材料的制备及其性能[J]. 青岛科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 38(4): 78-83.
[21] 王琎, 康海澜, 杨凤, 等. 天然杜仲胶/顺丁橡胶共混胶性能研究[J]. 特种橡胶制品, 2017, 38(4): 10-14.

杜仲胶复合义齿软衬材料的研制及细胞毒性检测

Preliminary development and cytotoxicity of Eucommia ulmoides gum composite soft denture liner

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨习良, 郑天霞, 李文, 王武良, 尹紫涵, 白宇宏. 硅酸盐根管封闭剂的体外细胞毒性、成骨潜力和抗菌活性评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(3): 246-250.
[2]	郑晶晶, 康馨允, 李少明, 刘嘉成, 孙凯, 高岭, 侯铁舟. MTA、iRoot SP和AH Plus 对人牙周膜干细胞增殖及分化的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(5): 449-455.
[3]	张耀升, 张锴, 陈欣慰, 牟海彰, 丁旺旺, 秦明礼, 张善勇, 龚勤林, 陈刚, 徐伟峰, 虞科恩, 姜艳梅. 3D打印个体化钛网的机械力学性能及生物相容性分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(3): 250-256.
[4]	任玉兰, 路璐, 李盛林, 俞光岩, 刘鹤. 人胚胎干细胞源角质形成细胞用于药物毒理检测的探讨[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(3): 257-261.
[5]	林瑞, 郁春华, 孙健. 用于三维打印咬合板的聚碳酸酯材料性能研究[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(5): 467-471.
[6]	张长源, 牛刚, 靳祎祎, 于皓, 程辉. 3种树脂水门汀对人牙龈成纤维细胞的体外细胞毒性[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2017, 26(6): 594-598.
[7]	樊江源, 林婷婷, 胡方旋, 郑瑞斌, 樊帆, 麻健丰. 烧结温度对牙科氧化锆增韧氧化铝陶瓷力学性能的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2017, 26(2): 129-133.
[8]	郭珲, 潘克清, 邓婧, 刘学玉, 宋佳. 羧甲基壳聚糖锌多肽复合材料对人牙周膜成纤维细胞的毒性[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2017, 26(2): 162-166.
[9]	何淞，陈周艳，杨四维，黄跃. 唇舌侧弓丝力学性能差异的三维有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2015, 24(6): 660-666.
[10]	杨松, 程辉, 李秀容, 吴维青, 郑明, 王颖卉. 反复熔铸对纯钛烤瓷合金力学性能的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2014, 23(6): 651-653.
[11]	史爽, 包志凡, 陈旭, 张丹丹. 新型牙髓治疗材料iRoot BP Plus对人牙龈成纤维细胞的细胞毒性[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2014, 23(6): 681-684.
[12]	李俊亮, 王文梅, 葛久禹, 季骏, 王天丛. 5种牙本质黏结剂对人牙周膜细胞毒性的比较[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2013, 22(6): 628-633.
[13]	石勇, 宋玮, 刘晓芳, 高利敏, 宋光保. 抗菌肽rHBD3对义齿软衬材料表面白色念珠菌黏附性能的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2013, 22(4): 389-392.
[14]	周群, 苗磊, 冯靖雯, 余和东, 郭蕾, 林晓萍. 钴铬钼合金对L929细胞生物学行为的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2013, 22(4): 407-413.
[15]	毕玮;余优成;龚逸明;周康;赵青华;胡美玉. 活性钙离子液对离体牙超微形态的影响与细胞毒性评价 [J]. 上海口腔医学, 2012, 21(4): 402-406.