CAD/CAM纯钛烤瓷冠的抗疲劳性与抗折性分析

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2019.02.002

上海口腔医学 ›› 2019, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (2): 118-122.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2019.02.002

CAD/CAM纯钛烤瓷冠的抗疲劳性与抗折性分析

连颂峰¹, 林敬凯¹, 蔡坤灿², 张晏祥¹

1.厦门长庚医院口腔科,福建厦门 361028;
2.厦门市仿真美义齿科技有限公司,福建厦门 361000

收稿日期:2018-07-02 修回日期:2018-09-08 出版日期:2019-04-25 发布日期:2019-06-20
通讯作者: 连颂峰,Tel:0592-6202502,E-mail:losmeteor@163.com
作者简介:连颂峰（1981-）,男,硕士研究生,主治医师
基金资助:
厦门市科技惠民计划（3502Z20159008）; 厦门市海沧区卫生科研项目（350205Z20154012）

Study on fatigue and fracture resistance of metal ceramic crowns with CAD/CAM-fabricated titanium copings

LIAN Song-feng¹, LIN Ching-kai¹, TSAI Kung-tsan², CHANG Yen-hsiang¹

1. Department of Stomatology, Xiamen Changung Hospital. Xiamen 361028;
2. Xiamen Fangzhenmei Denture Technology Co. Ltd. Xiamen 361000, Fujian Province, China

Received:2018-07-02 Revised:2018-09-08 Online:2019-04-25 Published:2019-06-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的比较CAD/CAM纯钛烤瓷冠及镍铬烤瓷冠的抗疲劳性与抗折性。方法制作前磨牙形态镍铬合金烤瓷冠（Ni组）、CAD/CAM纯钛烤瓷冠（Ti组）各12个。为缩小2组试件之间的尺寸差异,制作过程中对试件进行扫描、图像测量及反馈调整。将所有烤瓷冠粘结于统一切削制作的纯钛代型上,经过5000次冷热循环（5~55℃）和75000次50 N的往复加载后,再接受静态加载至崩瓷,获得崩瓷时的载荷力值（F）。折裂面置于体式显微镜下,观察折裂范围及破坏形式。采用SPSS13.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果 2组试件崩瓷时的载荷力值分别为Ni组(1645±356)N、Ti组(1555±331)N,差异无统计学意义(P=0.525)。折裂主要发生在冠的舌1/3。Ti组有3个试件为界面破坏,其余为混合破坏;而Ni组均为混合破坏。结论 CAD/CAM纯钛烤瓷冠具有与镍铬合金烤瓷冠相近的抗疲劳性及抗折性。

关键词: 纯钛, CAD/CAM, 金属烤瓷, 抗折力, 循环加载, 冷热循环

Abstract: PURPOSE: To compare the fatigue and fracture resistance of metal ceramic crowns (MCCs) with nickel-chromium and CAD/CAM-fabricated titanium copings. METHODS: Twelve premolar MCCs were fabricated with cast nickel-chromium alloy (Ni group) and CAD/CAM-fabricated titanium (Ti group) copings, respectively. To minimize the differences among specimens, the geometric dimensions of the MCCs were tested with a laboratory scanner and digital measurement software and then adjusted. After cemented to identically milled titanium dies, each specimen was subjected to thermocycling (5-55℃, 5000 cycles) and cyclic loading (75000 cycles) test, followed by a static load-to-fracture test to measure the fracture loads(F). The fractures were characterized using stereomicroscope. SPSS13.0 software package was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The mean fracture loads were (1645±356)N for Ni group and (1555±331)N for Ti group. No significant difference was observed (P=0.525). Most of the fractures were confined to the palatal third. The chief failure mode for all specimens from Ni group and most of the specimens from Ti groups was mixed failure. Adhesive failure was noted in 3 specimens from Ti group. CONCLUSIONS: The fracture resistance of MCCs with CAD/CAM-fabricated titanium copings is similar to that of MCCs with nickel-chromium copings.

Key words: Pure titanium, CAD/CAM, Metal ceramic, Fracture resistance, Cyclic loading, Thermal cycling

中图分类号:

R783.1

连颂峰, 林敬凯, 蔡坤灿, 张晏祥. CAD/CAM纯钛烤瓷冠的抗疲劳性与抗折性分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(2): 118-122.

LIAN Song-feng, LIN Ching-kai, TSAI Kung-tsan, CHANG Yen-hsiang. Study on fatigue and fracture resistance of metal ceramic crowns with CAD/CAM-fabricated titanium copings[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2019, 28(2): 118-122.

参考文献

[1] 韩建业, 罗锦华, 袁思波, 等. 口腔用钛及钛合金材料的研究现状[J]. 钛工业进展, 2016, 33(3): 1-7.
[2] 任卫红, 郭天文. 钛的氧化行为对钛瓷结合力的影响[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2007, 23(4): 554-557.
[3] Haag P, Nilner K.Bonding between titanium and dental porcelain: a systematic review[J]. Acta Odontol Scand, 2010, 68(3): 154-164.
[4] 郭慧. 4种纯钛专用瓷粉对钛瓷结合强度的影响[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2012, 28(5): 476-482.
[5] 连颂峰, 林敬凯, 蔡坤灿, 等. 纯钛烤瓷冠与镍铬烤瓷冠抗折力的对比研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(8): 885-888.
[6] 吴素然, 张钊, 袁硕, 等. CAD/CAM 纯钛和铸造纯钛与瓷结合强度的对比研究[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2015, 31(3): 327-330.
[7] Zhang CC, Ye JT, Zhang YP, et al.Effect of titanium preoxidation on wrought pure titanium to ceramic bond strength[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2013, 109(2): 106-112.
[8] Elsaka SE.Influence of surface treatment on adhesion of porcelain to titanium[J]. J Prosthodont, 2013, 22(6): 465-471.
[9] Golebiowski M, Wolowiec E, Klimek PL.Airborne-particle abrasion parameters on the quality of titanium-ceramic bonds[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2015, 113(5): 453-459.
[10] 王晓静, 王国伟, 惠光艳, 等. 磁控溅射ZrSiN/ZrO₂复合梯度涂层纯钛表面对钛瓷结合强度的影响[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2016, 32(5): 635-639.
[11] Marcelli E, Costantino ML, Villa T, et al.Effect of intermediate ZrO₂-CaO coatings deposited by cold thermal spraying on the titanium-porcelain bond in dental restorations[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2014, 112(5): 1201-1211.
[12] Alsadon O, Patrick D, Johnson A, et al.Fracture resistance of zirconia-composite veneered crowns in comparison with zirconia-porcelain crowns[J]. Dent Mater J, 2017, 36(3): 289-295.
[13] Aboushelib MN, Feilzer AJ, Kleverlaan CJ.Bridging the gap between clinical failure and laboratory fracture strength tests using a fractographic approach[J]. Dent Mater, 2009, 25(3): 383-391.
[14] Morresi AL, D'Amario M, Capogreco M, et al. Thermal cycling for restorative materials: does a standardized protocol exist in laboratory testing? A literature review[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2014, 29(1): 295-308.
[15] Gale MS, Darvell BW.Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations[J]. J Dent, 1999, 27(2): 89-99.
[16] Rosentritt M, Behr M, van der Zel JM, et al. Approach for evaluating the influence of laboratory simulation[J]. Dent Mater, 2009, 25(3): 348-352.
[17] Elshiyab SH, Nawafleh N, George R.Survival and testing parameters of zirconia-based crowns under cyclic loading in an aqueous environment: a systematic review[J]. J Investig Clin Dent, 2017, 8(4): e12261.
[18] Kim B, Zhang Y, Pines M, et al.Fracture of porcelain-veneered structures in fatigue[J]. J Dent Res, 2007, 86(2): 142-146.
[19] 谭勇, 高勃. 热循环和机械循环对切削Ti2448和纯钛金瓷结合强度的影响[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2016, 34(1): 54-58.
[20] Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Serrao G, et al.Single tooth bite forces in healthy young adults[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2004, 31(1): 18-22.
[21] Gibbs CH, Mahan PE, Lundeen HC, et al.Occlusal forces during

CAD/CAM纯钛烤瓷冠的抗疲劳性与抗折性分析

Study on fatigue and fracture resistance of metal ceramic crowns with CAD/CAM-fabricated titanium copings

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨华旋, 陈任生, 黄家辉, 孔海影, 张林林. 铒激光预处理对牙本质、牙釉质粘结强度及CAD/CAM玻璃陶瓷嵌体修复牙体缺损边缘微渗漏的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(3): 245-249.
[2]	金夏悦, 余润平, 花葳蕾, 黄慧. 1 374例椅旁CAD/CAM全瓷修复体的类型及颜色调查[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(2): 200-204.
[3]	胡丹丹, 任灿霞, 骆小平. 表面处理对激光选区熔化成型纯钛钛瓷结合强度的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(3): 230-235.
[4]	赵琛, 白月辉, 刘阳, 姜杉杉, 商庆龙, 赵甜甜, 袁硕, 李宁, 焦建平. 基牙抛光方式和时间对CAD/CAM氧化锆全瓷冠适合性的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(3): 236-240.
[5]	徐欣蕊, 余润平, 袁芸, 张洪铭, 黄慧. 基于下颌运动轨迹数据指导的数字化全冠咬合面精度评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(1): 58-62.
[6]	林晨官璐, 胡小坤, 严雨欣, 曲延慧, 刘梅, 章非敏. 2种椅旁CAD/CAM修复材料冠抗折强度的体外研究[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(1): 7-12.
[7]	吕继新, 于卫强, 佘文君, 翁维民. 不同基牙设计对CAD/CAM全瓷修复体抗折强度的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(6): 578-580.
[8]	陈诚, 张琳梅, 任文豪, 高岭, 李少明, 程政, 郅克谦. 个性化重建板辅助游离腓骨重建上颌骨半侧缺损的优化设计[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(5): 455-460.
[9]	许辛夷, 张银莲, 耿芳惠. CAD/CAM氧化锆全瓷冠和金属烤瓷冠的临床应用及对牙周组织影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2017, 26(3): 331-335.
[10]	吴金双, 邢鹤琳, 董超芳, 郭天文, 杨瑟飞. 使用FUS-invest锆系牙科纯钛包埋料提高铸件的物理机械性能及精度[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2017, 26(2): 139-145.
[11]	邵珺雅, 汪建中, 徐梦蓉, 周兰芳. 烟草对人牙龈成纤维细胞增殖及纤维连接蛋白表达的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2017, 26(1): 7-11.
[12]	耿黎，乔广艳，顾凯凯. 氟对变形链球菌黏附前后纯钛表面腐蚀性能的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2016, 25(2): 150-156.
[13]	闫海鑫，，赵彦博，秦丽梅,，祝海霆,，吴琳,. 钴铬合金、纯钛和Vitallium卡环3年使用期间的固位力变化[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2015, 24(6): 696-701.
[14]	王珏,乔广艳,沈庆平,顾凯凯. 氟对纯钛表面变形链球菌和血链球菌黏附的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2015, 24(2): 141-146.
[15]	杨松, 程辉, 李秀容, 吴维青, 郑明, 王颖卉. 反复熔铸对纯钛烤瓷合金力学性能的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2014, 23(6): 651-653.