正畸微种植体植入早期骨改建中破骨细胞的观察

上海口腔医学 ›› 2013, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (4): 368-373.

正畸微种植体植入早期骨改建中破骨细胞的观察

张薇，郭佳佳，朱文倩，唐国华

(上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院?口腔医学院口腔正畸科，上海市口腔医学重点实验室，上海 200011)

收稿日期:2013-01-18 修回日期:2013-03-10 出版日期:2013-08-10 发布日期:2013-08-10
通讯作者: 唐国华，Tel:021-23271699,E-mail:drtanggh@gmail.com
作者简介:张薇(1986-)，女，硕士研究生,E-mail:zhangwei860920@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(81271113)

Osteoclasts and early bone remodeling after orthodontic micro-implant placement

ZHANG Wei, GUO Jia-jia, ZHU Wen-qian, TANG Guo-hua

Department of Orthodontics, Ninth People’s Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology. Shanghai 200011, China

Received:2013-01-18 Revised:2013-03-10 Online:2013-08-10 Published:2013-08-10
Supported by:
Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China(81271113).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：观察微种植体植入早期破骨细胞的产生，探讨破骨细胞变化与骨改建的关系。方法：雄性新西兰兔20只随机分为4组，在胫骨近心端近骺板处植入微种植体1颗，分别于植入3、7、14、28 d后处死(每组5只)。HE染色观察微种植体周围骨组织的形态学变化，抗酒石酸酸性磷酸酶(TRAP)染色标记破骨细胞并作半定量分析。采用SPSS19.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果：微种植体植入3 d后，种植体骨接触区可见大量红细胞、炎症细胞、间叶细胞和骨碎屑，无明显破骨细胞。7 d后，编织骨新生，呈颗粒状，破骨细胞位于骨陷窝中。14 d时，大量新生的编织骨呈网格状，破骨细胞增多，骨改建明显。28 d时，编织骨成片状，与层状骨相连，破骨细胞数目减少。TRAP染色半定量分析显示，破骨细胞数目在14 d时达到高峰，各时间点间均有显著差异(P<0.01)。结论：在正畸微种植体植入早期破骨细胞产生，在新骨生成的活跃阶段破骨细胞数目增多，提示破骨细胞参与微种植体周的骨改建过程。

关键词: 微种植体, 破骨细胞, 骨形成, 骨改建

Abstract: PURPOSE: To observe the incidence of osteoclasts during early bone remodeling after orthodontic micro-implant placement. METHODS：Twenty New Zealand rabbits were randomly allotted into 4 groups. One micro-implant was implanted proximal to the epiphyseal plate of the tibia. Animals were sacrificed on day 3, 7, 14 and 28 (n=5). The sequence of histological changes around the micro-implants were evaluated by hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining. Osteoclasts were identified by TRAP staining. The differences of the number of the osteoclasts among each time point were analyzed by one way ANOVA with SPSS 19.0 software package. RESULTS: After 3 days of implantation, a large number of erythrocytes, inflammatory cells, mesenchymal cells and bone debris were seen at the implant bone interfaces. Few osteoclasts were observed. On day 7, granular woven bone was formed and some osteoclasts were found in the Howship’s lacunae. New bone formation and mineralization were apparent on day 14. Meanwhile, large amounts of osteoclasts were found in the latticed woven bone. On day 28，woven trabeculae with lamellate structures connected to lamellar bone and fewer osteoclasts were identified. Semi-quantitative analysis showed that the number of the osteoclasts was at peak on day 14. There were significant differences among each time point (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Osteoclast activity is closely related to bone formation and remodeling after micro-implant insertion.

Key words: Micro-implant, Osteoclast, Bone formation, Bone remodeling

中图分类号:

R738.5

张薇, 郭佳佳, 朱文倩, 唐国华. 正畸微种植体植入早期骨改建中破骨细胞的观察[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2013, 22(4): 368-373.

ZHANG Wei, GUO Jia-jia, ZHU Wen-qian, TANG Guo-hua. Osteoclasts and early bone remodeling after orthodontic micro-implant placement[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2013, 22(4): 368-373.

参考文献

[1] Motoyoshi M, Inaba M, Ono A, et al. The effect of cortical bone thickness on the stability of orthodontic mini-implants and on the stress distribution in surrounding bone[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2009, 38(1): 13-18.
[2] Wiechmann D, Meyer U, Büchter A. Success rate of mini- and micro-implants used for orthodontic anchorage: a prospective clinical study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res,2007, 18(2): 263-267.
[3] Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Lang NP, et al. De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2003, 14(3): 251-262.
[4] Wu J, Bai YX, Wang BK. Biomechanical and histomorphometric characterizations of osseointegration during mini-screw healing in rabbit tibiae[J]. Angle Orthod, 2009, 79(3): 558-563.
[5] Park IP, Kim SK, Lee SJ, et al. The relationship between initial implant stability quotient values and bone-to-implant contact ratio in the rabbit tibia[J]. J Adv Prosthodont, 2011, 3(2): 76-80.
[6] Sennerby L, Thomsen P, Ericson LE. Early tissue response to titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical bone[J]. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 1993, 4(3): 240-250.
[7] Ek-Rylander B, Flores M, Wendel M, et al. Dephosphorylation of osteopontin and bone sialoprotein by osteoclastic tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase. Modulation of osteoclast adhesion in vitro[J]. J Biol Chem, 1994, 269(21): 14853-14856.
[8] Halleen JM, R?is?nen S, Salo JJ, et al. Intracellular fragmentation of bone resorption products by reactive oxygen species generated by osteoclastic tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase[J]. J Biol Chem, 1999, 274(33): 22907-22910.
[9] Chambers TJ. Regulation of the differentiation and function of osteoclasts[J]. J Pathol, 2000, 192(1): 4-13.
[10] Suda T, Takahashi N, Udagawa N, et al. Modulation of osteoclast differentiation and function by the new members of the tumor necrosis factor receptor and ligand families[J]. Endocr Rev, 1999, 20(3): 345-357.
[11] 柳忠豪, 周文娟, 郝鹏杰, 等. 种植体植入后牙槽骨破骨细胞的活性变化[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2012, 21(5): 511-514.
[12] 王斌, 何福明. 非负荷期种植体周围破骨细胞动态变化的组织学观察[J]. 现代实用医学, 2007, 19(8): 605-606, 620.
[13] Wu X, Deng F, Wang Z, et al. Biomechanical and histomorphometric analyses of the osseointegration of microscrews with different surgical techniques in Beagle dogs[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2008, 106(5): 644-650.
[14] Deguchi T, Takano-Yamamoto T, Kanomi R, et al. The use of small titanium screws for orthodontic anchorage[J]. J Dent Res, 2003, 82(5): 377-381.
[15] Ryu J, Kim HJ, Chang EJ, et al. Sphingosine 1-phosphate as a regulator of osteoclast differentiation and osteoclast-osteoblast coupling[J]. EMBO J, 2006, 25(24): 5840-5851.
[16] Kubota K, Sakikawa C, Katsumata M, et al. Platelet-derived growth factor BB secreted from osteoclasts acts as an osteoblastogenesis inhibitory factor[J]. J Bone Miner Res, 2002, 17(2): 257-265.
[17] O’Sullivan S, Naot D, Callon K, et al. Imatinib promotes osteoblast differentiation by inhibiting PDGFR signaling and inhibits osteoclastogenesis by both direct and stromal cell-dependent mechanisms[J]. J Bone Miner Res, 2007, 22(11): 1679-1689.
[18] Kim MS, Magno CL, Day CJ, et al. Induction of chemokines and chemokine receptors CCR2b and CCR4 in authentic human osteoclasts differentiated with RANKL and osteoclast like cells differentiated by MCP-1 and RANTES[J]. J Cell Biochem, 2006, 97(3): 512-518.
[19] Pixley FJ, Stanley ER. CSF-1 regulation of the wandering macrophage: complexity in action[J]. Trends Cell Biol,2004,14(11): 628-638.
[20] Kim SH, Choi BH, Li J, et al. Peri-implant bone reactions at delayed and immediately loaded implants: an experimental study[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2008, 105(2): 144-148.
[21] Zhao L, Xu Z, Yang Z, et al. Orthodontic mini-implant stability in different healing times before loading: a microscopic computerized tomographic and biomechanical analysis[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2009, 108(2): 196-202.