上海口腔医学 ›› 2025, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 276-280.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2025.03.010

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

浓缩生长因子膜及海奥口腔修复膜保存后牙区拔牙位点的疗效评价

胡韶光, 吴翠玲, 汪泉, 殷妹红, 林后学   

  1. 马鞍山十七冶医院 口腔科,安徽 马鞍山 243000
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-20 修回日期:2025-03-05 出版日期:2025-06-25 发布日期:2025-06-24
  • 通讯作者: 林后学,E-mail:hxlin1230@163.com
  • 作者简介:胡韶光(1984-),男,硕士研究生,主治医师,E-mail:hsg10292@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省自然科学基金面上项目(2008085MH255); 马鞍山市科技计划项目(YL-2022-28)

Evaluation of the effect of concentrated growth factor membrane and Haiao oral repair membrane on the preservation of tooth extraction site in the posterior tooth region

Hu Shaoguang, Wu Cuiling, Wang Quan, Yin Meihong, Lin Houxue   

  1. Department of Stomatology, 17th Metallurgical Hospital, Ma'anshan. Ma'anshan 243000, Anhui Province, China
  • Received:2025-01-20 Revised:2025-03-05 Online:2025-06-25 Published:2025-06-24

摘要: 目的: 评价浓缩生长因子(concentrated growth factor,CGF)膜及海奥口腔修复膜保存后牙区拔牙位点的疗效。方法: 选择2020年1月—2022年12月后牙拔除需行位点保存的患者96例,采用随机数字表法分为A、B 两组,每组各48例。两组患者拔牙后均填入Bio-Oss骨粉,A组采用CGF膜覆盖拔牙创,B组采用海奥口腔修复膜覆盖。比较两组患者术区愈合情况、牙槽骨垂直高度和水平宽度变化、疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analog scoring,VAS)、颊侧和腭侧组织厚度变化及再植骨率。结果: 术后1周,A组拔牙创愈合良好,B组2例愈合不良,两组愈合情况相比无显著差异(P>0.05)。术前,两组牙槽骨垂直高度和水平宽度相比无显著差异(P>0.05);术后6个月,两组牙槽骨垂直高度显著增加,水平宽度显著减少(P<0.05),但组间相比无显著差异(P>0.05)。两组患者术后1周疼痛VAS评分低于术后3 d、24 h,且A组VAS评分更低,组间、时点间、组间·时点间交互作用相比差异显著(P<0.05)。两组患者术前、术后6个月颊侧和腭侧组织厚度相比无显著差异(P>0.05);术后6个月,B组腭侧组织厚度显著低于术前(P<0.05)。术后6个月,A、B组再植骨率分别为4.17%、6.25%,两组相比无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论: CGF膜和海奥口腔修复膜用于后牙区拔牙位点保存具有较好疗效,可有效延缓牙槽骨吸收。CGF降低患者术后短期疼痛效果更好。

关键词: 拔牙位点保存, 浓缩生长因子, 海奥口腔修复膜, 牙槽骨

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of concentrated growth factor (CGF) membrane and Haiao oral repair membrane on the preservation of extraction sites in the posterior area of teeth. METHODS: A total of 96 patients requiring site preservation after posterior tooth extraction from January 2020 to December 2022 were selected and divided into groups A and B by random number table method, with 48 cases in each group. After tooth extraction, Bio-Oss bone powder was used to cover tooth extraction wound in group A with CGF membrane, and in group B with Haiao oral repair membrane. The healing of the operative area, the changes of vertical height and horizontal width of alveolar bone, visual analog scoring (VAS) of pain, the changes of buccal and palatal tissue thickness and the rate of bone replantation were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: One week after operation, the tooth extraction wound in group A healed well, while 2 cases in group B healed poorly, but there was no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05). Before surgery, there was no significant difference in vertical height and horizontal width of alveolar bone between the two groups(P>0.05); at 6 months after operation, the vertical height of alveolar bone was significantly increased and the horizontal width was significantly decreased(P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05).The VAS score of pain 1 week after surgery in 2 groups was lower than that 3 days and 24 hours after surgery, and the VAS score of pain in group A was lower, and the interaction between groups, and time points were significantly different(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the thickness of buccal and palatal tissues between the two groups before and 6 months after surgery(P>0.05); at 6 months after surgery, the tissue thickness of the palatal side in group B was significantly lower than before surgery(P<0.05). Six months after surgery, the bone replantation rates in group A and group B were 4.17% and 6.25%, respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups(P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both CGF membrane and Haiao oral repair membrane have good efficacy in the preservation of tooth extraction sites in the posterior region, which can effectively delay alveolar bone mass absorption, and CGF has a better effect in reducing short-term postoperative pain in patients.

Key words: Preservation of tooth extraction site, Concentrated growth factor, Haiao oral repair membrane, Alveolar bone

中图分类号: