应用水激光和超声进行根管消毒的效果评价

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2017.03.018

上海口腔医学 ›› 2017, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (3): 314-316.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2017.03.018

应用水激光和超声进行根管消毒的效果评价

陆春慧, 钟群

上海市口腔病防治院·上海市口腔医院永嘉路门诊部,上海 200031

收稿日期:2016-12-09 修回日期:2017-03-10 出版日期:2017-06-25 发布日期:2017-07-05
通讯作者: 钟群,E-mail：zhongqun681115@qq.com
作者简介:陆春慧（1979-）,女,硕士,主治医师,E-mail: ntluts@aliyun.com

Comparison of antimicrobial activity of Er,Cr: YSGG laser and ultrasonic irrigation in root canal disinfection

LU Chun-hui, ZHONG Qun

Yongjia Dental Clinic, Shanghai Stomatological Hospital. Shanghai 200031, China

Received:2016-12-09 Revised:2017-03-10 Online:2017-06-25 Published:2017-07-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的比较水激光和超声在根管消毒方面的杀菌效果,为临床应用提供理论依据。方法选择慢性根尖周炎患者60例,随机均分为3组,分别采用常规机械预备和冲洗（对照组）、常规机械预备后用水激光消毒处理（水激光组）、常规机械预备后超声荡洗根管（超声组）。用纸尖法提取根管根尖1/3的样本,用BHI培养液10倍系列稀释,分别取50 μL 接种于BHI血琼脂平板培养基中,37℃厌氧（80% N₂,10% H₂和10% CO₂）培养24 h后计数菌落。应用SPSS19.0软件包进行单因素方差分析,比较3组病例根管预备前、后的细菌数量变化,评价三者的根管消毒效果。结果3组在根管预备前的细菌数量无显著差异,根管预备后3组的细菌数量均有明显减少,具有显著差异。水激光组和超声组预备后的细菌数量减少显著大于对照组（P<0.05）,水激光组和超声组之间无显著差异（P>0.05）。结论经根管预备后根管内的细菌数量明显减少,应用水激光或超声后细菌减少更明显,应用水激光或超声可以增加根管的消毒效果。

关键词: 水激光, 超声, 根管消毒, 杀菌效果

Abstract: PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the antimicrobial activity of Er,Cr:YSGG laser and ultrasonic irrigation in root canal disinfection. METHODS: Sixty decayed teeth requiring root canal therapy were divided into 3 groups randomly: Er,Cr:YSGG laser group, ultrasonic irrigation group and control group, 20 in each group. The bacteria in each group were incubated and counted before and after root canal treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 19.0 software package. RESULTS: In the 3 groups, the number of bacteria in root canals was reduced significantly after root canal treatment (P<0.05). The number of bacteria in Er,Cr:YSGG laser group and ultrasonic irrigation group decreased significantly greater than the control group (P<0.05), but the Er,Cr:YSGG laser group and ultrasonic irrigation group had no significant difference(P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: After root canal treatment, the number of bacteria in the root canal is obviously reduced. The antimicrobial activity of three intercanal methods on bacteria in root canals is profound. The reduction of bacteria is more obvious after treatment of Er,Cr:YSGG laser and ultrasonic irrigation than the control.

Key words: Er,Cr:YSGG laser, Ultrasonic irrigation, Root canal disinfection, Antimicrobial activity

中图分类号:

R781.4

陆春慧, 钟群. 应用水激光和超声进行根管消毒的效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2017, 26(3): 314-316.

LU Chun-hui, ZHONG Qun. Comparison of antimicrobial activity of Er,Cr: YSGG laser and ultrasonic irrigation in root canal disinfection[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2017, 26(3): 314-316.

参考文献

[1] Kojima K, Inamoto K, Nagamatsu K, et al. Success rate of endodontic treatment of teeth with vital and nonvital pulps. A meta-analysis [J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2004, 97(1): 95-99.
[2] Weiger R, Axmann-Krcmar D, Löst C. Prognosis of conventional root canal treatment reconsidered [J]. Endod Dent Traumatol, 1998, 14(1): 1-9.
[3] Pataky L, Iványi I, Grigár A, et al. Antimicrobial efficacy of various root canal preparation techniques: an in vitro comparative study [J]. J Endod, 2002, 28(8): 603-605.
[4] 王倩倩, 姚娜, 赵晓一, 等. 光活化消毒技术根管内消毒效果的研究 [J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2010, 37(4): 392-395.
[5] Gordon W, Atabakhsh VA, Meza F, et al. The antimicrobial efficacy of the erbium, chromium: yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser with radial emitting tips on root canal dentin walls infected with Enterococcus faecalis [J]. J Am Dent Assoc, 2007, 138(7): 992-1002.
[6] Schoop U, Barylyak A, Goharkhay K, et al. The impact of an erbium, chromium: yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser with radial-firing tips on endodontic treatment [J]. Lasers Med Sci, 2009, 24(1): 59-65.
[7] Peeters HH, Suardita K. Efficacy of smear layer removal at the root tip by using ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and erbium, chromium: yttrium, scandium, gallium garnet laser [J]. J Endod, 2011, 37(11): 1585-1589.
[8] Garcez AS, Ribeiro MS, Tegos GP, et al. Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy combined with conventional endodontic treatment to eliminate root canal biofilm infection [J]. Lasers Surg Med, 2007, 39(1): 59-66.
[9] van der Sluis LW, Versluis M, Wu MK, et al. Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: a review of the literature [J]. Int Endod J, 2007, 40(6): 415-426.
[10] Castelo-Baz P, Martin-Biedma B, Cantatore G, et al. In vitro comparison of passive and continuous ultrasonic irrigation in simulated lateral canals of extracted teeth[J]. J Endod, 2012, 38(5): 688-691.
[11] 刘桂香,王青,窦慧芹. 超声冲洗对感染根管内毒素的灭活及清除作 [J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2010, 28(2): 158-161.
[12] Paiva SS, Siqueira JF Jr, Rôças IN, et al. Supplementing the antimicrobial effects of chemomechanical debridement with either passive ultrasonic irrigation or a final rinse with chlorhexidine: a clinical study [J]. J Endod, 2012, 38(9): 1202-1206.
[13] Carver K, Nusstein J, Reader A, et al. In vivo antibacterial efficacy of ultrasound after hand and rotary instrumentation in human mandibular molars [J]. J Endod, 2007, 33(9): 1038-1043.

[1]	伍甜甜, 韩艳彦, 汪轶. 不同方法对根管内氢氧化钙去除效果的micro-CT评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(3): 225-228.
[2]	周辉红, 陈倩倩, 袁方, 孙晶晶, 田臻, 熊屏. 7例头颈部Castleman病超声特征分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(3): 328-331.
[3]	刘昭辰, 孙培, 潘克清, 王培彦, 张慧, 袁昌青, 邓婧. 次氯酸溶液的稳定性及对口腔组织刺激性的体外研究[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(2): 141-147.
[4]	江煜, 石磊, 蔡佳. 超声冲洗结合氯己定在牙髓炎根管治疗中的应用效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(2): 170-174.
[5]	陈倩倩, 余强, 孙晶晶, 熊屏. 12例Warthin瘤样黏液表皮样癌影像学分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(2): 219-224.
[6]	杨帆, 兰旭, 金幼虹. 超声刮治联合透明质酸钠凝胶对慢性牙周炎及龈沟液中炎性因子hs-CRP、MCP-1、MMP-13的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(6): 645-649.
[7]	刘慧楠, 张富华, 蒲灼光. 不同荡洗策略治疗有瘘型慢性根尖周炎的临床效果比较[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(2): 188-192.
[8]	吕欢, 熊屏, 张蔚蒨, 龚霞, 李佳, 丁昂昂. 多模态超声对唾液腺肿瘤的鉴别诊断价值评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(4): 384-388.
[9]	陆卫青, 张炜亮, 向文静, 刘宾益, 曹伟玉, 杨一鸣. 牙周内镜辅助牙周非手术治疗对牙龈退缩的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(4): 435-438.
[10]	PRIYA Vishnu, 邵皎皎, 封菲, 张旗. 被动超声冲洗对弯曲根管的碎屑清理能力和根管形态的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(1): 6-11.
[11]	单晓阳, 孙莉青, 王月月, 杨楠, 孙慧斌. 微创开髓下3种根管消毒方法对粪肠球菌清除效果比较[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(1): 17-23.
[12]	谢克贤, 王霄. 新型套索装置取根管内折断器械的体外评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(6): 606-610.
[13]	李蕾, 李晓东, 庄乾伟, 葛良玉, 李志萍, 顾倩平, 白玉婷, 孟箭. 超声热疗联合TPF化疗治疗19例老年晚期口腔鳞癌的疗效分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(5): 543-547.
[14]	吴珍, 朱操云, 夏烨. 甘氨酸龈下喷砂预防种植体周围炎的临床效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(1): 97-99.
[15]	李东源, 汤云居, 沈雪敏, 张蔚蒨, 熊屏. 口内超声成像在18例口腔非咀嚼黏膜白斑诊疗中的评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(3): 275-280.

应用水激光和超声进行根管消毒的效果评价

Comparison of antimicrobial activity of Er,Cr: YSGG laser and ultrasonic irrigation in root canal disinfection

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价