Shanghai Journal of Stomatology ›› 2013, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (6): 684-689.

• Clinical Study • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Evaluation of upper airway and surrounding structures in patients with obstructive sleep apnea using cephalometry combined with Müller’s maneuver

ZHAO Yan-hui, ZHU Min, LU Xiao-feng, SUN Hong-xia, NIE Ping, XU Xiao-long, TAO Li   

  1. Department of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Science, Ninth People’s Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology. Shanghai 200011, China
  • Received:2013-06-03 Revised:2013-07-05 Online:2013-04-12 Published:2013-04-12
  • Supported by:
    Supported by Research Fund of Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (11140902001).

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the upper airway and surrounding structures under intraluminal pressure using cephalometry combined with Müller’s maneuver in obstructive sleep apnea and hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) patients with different severity. METHODS: Thirty-nine male patients were enrolled in our department during June 2011 to February 2012. Polysomnography (PSG) and anthropometric measurements data were recorded prior to the study. The lateral cephalograms of each patient were obtained during both the end-expiration phase and Müller’s maneuver phase. The patients enrolled were classified into 3 groups according to the results of apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), including mild group (n=11), moderate group (n=14), and severe group (n=14). Craniofacial and upper airway structures were measured in lateral cephalometry by application of Cassos 2001 computed aided measurement software before and after the patients practicing Müller’s maneuver. The data was analysed using SAS 9.13 software package. RESULTS: [Müller’s] maneuver had a great influence on the upper airway and surrounding tissue, including increased thickness of the uvula, reduction in the anteroposterior dimension of retropalatal and increased vertical distance of the hyoid bone to the mandible in all groups (P<0.05). In addition, Müller’s maneuver also had an impact on the length of the upper airway, which was more significant in severe cases. CONCLUSIONS: Cephalometry combined with [Müller’s] maneuver can display how the intraluminal pressure function on the upper airway and surrounding tissues, and they also can distinguish some minor differences of the upper airway in patients with different security.

Key words: Cephalometry, OSAHS, Müller’s maneuver, Upper airway structures

CLC Number: