Application of small intestinal submucosa absorbable biofilm in the repair of alveolar bone defects

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2024.03.012

Abstract

Abstract: PURPOSE: To study the clinical efficacy of small intestinal submucosa (SIS) absorbable biological membrane in alveolar bone defect repair. METHODS: A total of 102 patients with alveolar bone defect who received guided bone regeneration (GBR) in our hospital from January 2020 to January 2022 were selected and divided into Bio-Gide group (51 cases using Bio-Gide absorbable biofilm) and SIS group (51 cases using SIS absorbable biofilm) by computer random number generator. The perioperative related indicators, blood calcium, blood phosphorus, biocompatibility, periodontal attachment loss (PAL) length, pulp sensitivity, tooth mobility, alveolar bone volume and adverse events of the two groups were compared. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 24.0 software package. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, visual analogue scale (VAS) score of pain on the first day after operation, VAS score on the fifth day after operation, wound healing time, blood calcium and phosphorus levels before operation, 1 d and 12 d after operation, PAL length before operation, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after operation, pulp sensitivity and tooth looseness grade 1 and 2 percentage at 3, 6 and 12 months after operation, bone width increase, bone height increase at 12 months after operation and adverse event rate between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with Bio-Gide group, the wound healing time and biofilm absorption time were shortened in SIS group(P<0.05), and the incidence of rejection was decreased 12 d after operation (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: SIS absorbable biofilm and Bio-Gide absorbable biofilm have similar efficacy and safety in repairing GBR for alveolar bone defects, but the former is more biocompatible and the latter can provide longer barrier function.

Key words: Alveolar bone defect repair, Small intestinal submucosa absorbable biological membrane, Bio-Gide absorbable biological membrane, Guided bone regeneration

CLC Number:

R781.2

ZHANG Min-zhen, KUANG Hui-fang, YANG Li-yan, LUO Wen. Application of small intestinal submucosa absorbable biofilm in the repair of alveolar bone defects[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2024, 33(3): 279-284.

References

[1] 殷冉, 赵海礁, 李玉超, 等. 锥形束CT评价伴安氏Ⅱ类错畸形正畸史牙周炎患者牙槽骨缺损特点的研究[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2021, 56(8): 769-776.
[2] Yu K, Liu W, Su N, et al.Evaluation of resorption and osseointegration of autogenous bone ring grafting in vertical bone defect with simultaneous implant placement in dogs[J]. J Oral Implantol, 2021, 47(4): 295-302.
[3] Ferreira CF, Carlini JL, Magini RS, et al.Allogeneic bone application in association with platelet-rich plasma for alveolar bone grafting of cleft palate defects[J]. Contemp Clin Dent, 2021, 12(2): 143-149.
[4] Chatelet M, Afota F, Savoldelli C.Review of bone graft and implant survival rate: a comparison between autogenous bone block versus guided bone regeneration[J]. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2022, 123(2): 222-227.
[5] Li S, Zhao J, Xie Y, et al.Hard tissue stability after guided bone regeneration: a comparison between digital titanium mesh and resorbable membrane[J]. Int J Oral Sci, 2021, 13(1): 37-45.
[6] 臧成五, 张凡亮, 杨诚, 等. 猪小肠黏膜下层脱细胞修复补片修复手部软组织缺损的效果分析[J]. 中华显微外科杂志, 2020, 43(2): 157-160.
[7] 马绪臣. 口腔颌面医学影像诊断学[M]. 6版. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2012: 18-19.
[8] Slagter KW, Meijer HJA, Hentenaar DFM, et al.Immediate single-tooth implant placement with simultaneous bone augmentation versus delayed implant placement after alveolar ridge preservation in bony defect sites in the esthetic region: a 5-year randomized controlled trial[J]. J Periodontol, 2021, 92(12): 1738-1748.
[9] Nibali L, Sultan D, Arena C, et al.Periodontal infrabony defects: systematic review of healing by defect morphology following regenerative surgery[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2021, 48(1): 100-113.
[10] Benic GI, Bienz SP, Song YW, et al.Randomized controlled clinical trial comparing guided bone regeneration of peri-implant defects with soft-type block versus particulate bone substitutes: six-month results of hard-tissue changes[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2022, 49(5): 480-495.
[11] Liu K, Huang Z, Chen Z, et al.Treatment of periodontal intrabony defects using bovine porous bone mineral and guided tissue regeneration with/without platelet-rich fibrin: a randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. J Periodontol, 2021, 92(11): 1546-1553.
[12] Liu Z, Wei P, Cui Q, et al.Guided bone regeneration with extracellular matrix scaffold of small intestinal submucosa membrane[J]. J Biomater Appl, 2022, 37(5): 805-813.
[13] Allan B, Ruan R, Landao-Bassonga E, et al.Collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration in dental and orthopedic applications[J]. Tissue Eng Part A, 2021, 27(5-6): 372-381.
[14] Oliveira EA, Dalla-Costa KL, França FM, et al.Influence of melatonin associated with the Bio-Gidemembrane on osteoblast activity: an in vitro study[J]. Acta Odontol Latinoam, 2022, 35(2): 90-97.
[15] 尤鹏越, 刘玉华, 王新知, 等. 脱细胞猪心包膜生物相容性及成骨性能的体内外评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(4): 776-784.
[16] Su Y, Ye B, Zeng L, et al.Small intestinal submucosa biomimetic periosteum promotes bone regeneration[J]. Membranes (Basel), 2022, 12(7): 719-731.
[17] Somani AK.Application expansion of small intestinal submucosa extracellular matrix in complex and surgical wounds[J]. J Wound Care, 2023, 32(Sup 1a): S20-S27.
[18] 王思雯, 尤鹏越, 刘玉华, 等. 两种可吸收生物膜联合去蛋白牛骨基质植入犬拔牙窝成骨的影像学评价[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2021, 53(2): 364-370.
[19] 巨佳, 刘玉华, 赵继志, 等. 猪小肠黏膜下层(SIS)可吸收生物膜用于牙槽骨和/或软组织修复重建的临床研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2022, 38(9): 848-853.
[20] Sun Z, Xiong H, Lou T, et al.Multifunctional extracellular matrix hydrogel with self-healing properties and promoting angiogenesis as an immunoregulation platform for diabetic wound healing[J]. Gels, 2023, 9(5): 381-401.