Shanghai Journal of Stomatology ›› 2019, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (2): 165-170.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2019.02.011

• Original Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Investigation of preoperative anxiety and postoperative quality of life in patients with periodontal mucogingival surgery

WANG Wei-qian1, HUANG Yue-hua2   

  1. 1. VIP Center, Hangzhou Dental Hospital. Hangzhou 310002, Zhejiang Province, China;
    2. Department of Periodontology, Hangzhou Dental Hospital. Hangzhou 310002, Zhejiang Province, China
  • Received:2018-09-04 Revised:2018-11-03 Online:2019-04-25 Published:2019-06-20

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate preoperative anxiety and postoperative quality of life in patients with periodontal mucogingival surgery, and provide a theoretical basis for preventing preoperative anxiety and improving postoperative quality of life in mucogingival surgery. METHODS: According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 26 patients with mucogingival surgery were randomly selected, including 13 cases undergoing free gingival graft and 13 cases undergoing subepithelial connective tissue graft. All patients were asked to answer the following questionnaires which included self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), modified dental anxiety scale (MDAS), pain evaluation using visual pain scale (VAS), clinical performance evaluation (swelling, bleeding, nausea, oral odor), and oral function evaluation (chewing, speaking, sleeping, working). Data analysis was performed using SPSS 18.0 software package. RESULTS: The preoperative SAS score was 44.33±11.99, 4 patients had anxiety, accounting for 15.38%. The preoperative MDSA score was 9.85±2.41, 4 patients had anxiety, accounting for 15.38%. The VAS values at 1 day, 3 days, 5 days, 7 days, and 10 days after surgery were moderate pain (4.54±1.32), mild pain (3.31±1.31), mild pain (2.00±1.14), and painless( 0.70±0.72), painless (0.08±0.27). The VAS values at 1 day, 3 days, and 5 days after FGG were greater than those after CTG (P<0.05).The most common discomforts after mucogingival surgery were swelling, bleeding, disturbance in chewing and speech. Swelling, disturbance in chewing and speech persisted until 7 days after surgery, and bleeding continued until 5 days after surgery. The postoperative discomfort of FGG was significantly higher than that of CTG. CONCLUSIONS: Four had preoperative anxiety prior to mucogingival surgery. The main clinical symptoms after surgery were moderate to mild pain, swelling, bleeding, disturbance in chewing and speech within 1-7 days after surgery. The effect of CTG on the quality of life of patients was significantly less than that of FGG.

Key words: Mucogingival surgery, Free gingival graft, Subepithelial connective tissue graft, Dental anxiety, Quality of life

CLC Number: