Study on the effects of improved shield technique in the aesthetic zone for single tooth implantation in the maxillary anterior region

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2024.06.015

Abstract

Abstract: PURPOSE: To explore the effects of improved shield technique in the aesthetic zone for single tooth implantation in the maxillary anterior region. METHODS: Eighty-four patients(84 teeth) who underwent single tooth implantation in the maxillary anterior region from January 2020 to January 2023 were selected,randomly divided into the control group and experimental group using digital table method, each with 42 patients(42 teeth). The success rate of implant in 2 groups was recorded, and periodontal index, pink esthetic score (PES), bone absorption and implant stability quotient (ISQ) preoperatively and 6 months after surgery were compared. The incidence of adverse reactions (redness, bleeding, pain and site infection) was recorded. SPSS 26.0 software package was used for statistical analysis of the data. RESULTS: The success rate of implantation in both groups was 100%. Six postoperative pericrescent indexes of the experimental group were significantly lower than that of the control group, PES and ISQ scores of the experimental group were significantly higher than that of the control group one year after surgery, bone absorption volume was significantly lower than that of the control group and the incidence of adverse reactions was significantly decreased(P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The improved shield technique in the aesthetic zone can enhance the esthetic index and implant stability in the anterior region, and reduce bone resorption volume.

Key words: Maxillary anterior region, Improved shield technique, Immediate implantation, Bone resorption volume

CLC Number:

R783.4

HU Zhong-yue, NIU Wei, CHEN Dai-yuan, ZOU Jin-yang, XIE Hui. Study on the effects of improved shield technique in the aesthetic zone for single tooth implantation in the maxillary anterior region[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2024, 33(6): 651-655.

References

[1] Slagter KW, Raghoebar GM, Hentenaar DFM, et al.Immediate placement of single implants with or without immediate provisionalization in the maxillary aesthetic region: a 5-year comparative study[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2021, 48(2):272-283.
[2] 王培, 苏小营, 后岷红. 上颌前牙区牙槽骨缺损形态与种植修复术后植骨吸收率的相关性及影响移植骨吸收的因素分析[J]. 中国现代医学杂志, 2023, 33(4): 6-10.
[3] Chen Z, Zhang S, Zhou J, et al.Immediate versus delayed implantation for single-tooth restoration of maxillary anterior teeth: a comparative analysis on efficacy[J]. Comput Math Methods Med, 2022, 2022:4490335.
[4] Salem AS, Mowafey B, El-Negoly SA, et al.Socket-shield technique vs conventional immediate implant placement for esthetic rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Contemp Dent Pract, 2022, 23(2): 237-244.
[5] Shadid RM.Socket shield technique and delayed implant placement in maxilla: a series of five case reports[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2022, 22(1): 110-121.
[6] 宿玉成. 种植成功标准[J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2023, 28(6): 472.
[7] Smojver I, Vuletic M, Illes D, et al.Pink esthetic score around single-tooth implant crowns after socket-shield technique: a prospective cohort study[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2023(7): s283-s294.
[8] Peeraprasompong W, Aunmeungtong W, Khongkhunthian P.Correlation between implant stability quotient and percussion sound frequency[J]. Clin Exp Dent Res, 2024, 10(4): e917.
[9] Ikbal M,Shen YW, Ruslin M, et al.Evaluation of sagittal root position and labial alveolar bone concavity in the maxillary anterior tooth area for immediate implant placement[J]. J Chin Med Assoc, 2023, 86(6): 565-570.
[10] Kim YT, Lee JH.Profilometric, esthetic, and patient-reported outcomes of the L-shape technique combined with delayed connective tissue grafting in the maxillary anterior region: a 3-year case series study[J]. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2024, 36(7): 967-975.
[11] Siormpas KD, Mitsias ME, Kotsakis GA, et al.The root membrane technique: a retrospective clinical study with up to 10 years of follow-up[J]. Implant Dent, 2018, 27(5): 564-574.
[12] 周亦凝, 顾迎新. “盾构术”应用于美学区种植的研究进展[J].中国口腔颌面外科杂志, 2022, 20(2):198-201.
[13] Di Carlo S, Ciolfi A, Grasso E, et al.A retrospective analysis of treatment outcomes following guided bone regeneration at sites exhibiting severe alveolar ridge atrophy[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2021, 32(6): e572-e578.
[14] Jiang C, Yao S, Guo Y, et al.Angiopoietin-like protein 2 deficiency promotes periodontal inflammation and alveolar bone loss[J]. J Periodontol, 2022, 93(10): 1525-1539.
[15] An YZ, Ko KA, Kim CS, et al.Do periodontal defects affect periodontal inflammation and destruction? histological/microbiological changes and gene expression profiles of a pilot study in beagle dogs[J]. J Periodontol, 2021, 92(7): 1007-1017.
[16] Tribst JPM, Dal Piva AMO, Borges ALS, et al.Influence of socket-shield technique on the biomechanical response of dental implant: three-dimensional finite element analysis[J]. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin, 2020, 23(6): 224-231.
[17] Abo-El-Saad MM, Melek LNF, Abdel Fattah HS, et al. Autogenous dentin graft versus alloplastic graft combined with socket shield for pre-implant socket preservation: a split-mouth randomized clinical trial[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2023, 52(10): 1090-1096.
[18] 唐晓枫, 吴庆庆, 陈曦, 等. 改良牙根屏障技术即刻种植即刻修复后口内美学区软组织轮廓动态监测及美学评估[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2024, 59(6): 551-558.
[19] 周麟, 李戎. 改良盾构术在前牙美学区即刻种植中的应用效果及对红色美学指数的影响[J]. 中国美容医学, 2023, 32(3): 120-123.
[20] Huynh-Ba G, Oates TW, Williams MAH.Immediate loading vs. early/conventional loading of immediately placed implants in partially edentulous patients from the patients' perspective: a systematic review[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018, 29(Suppl 16): 255-269.
[21] 邹晶, 丁丽. 改良盾构术即刻种植对上颌前牙区唇侧骨量、牙周组织及美学效果的影响[J]. 医学临床研究, 2022, 39(9): 1353-1355,1359.
[22] Ye Z, Ye H, Wu Y, et al.Effect of bone mass density and alveolar bone resorption on stress in implant restoration of free-end edentulous posterior mandible: finite element analysis of double-factor sensitivity[J]. Ann Anat, 2024, 253: 152210.
[23] Oliva S, Capogreco M, Murmura G, et al.The socket shield technique and its complications, implant survival rate, and clinical outcomes: a systematic review[J]. J Periodontal Implant Sci, 2023, 53(2): 99-109.