The influence of different preset drill radius and tooth position on the compensation gap of zirconium dioxide restoration

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2024.06.005

Abstract

Abstract: PURPOSE: To explore the influence of different preset drill radius on the drill compensation space of zirconia dioxide restoration and the characteristics of tooth position and anatomical parts of the drill compensation space. METHODS: The digital design data of 12 cases of incisor, premolar and molar were randomly selected, and the radius of the needle was preset to 0.3, 0.4, 0.5 and 0.6 mm. Software analysis was performed to obtain four evaluation index values for each group of drill compensation gaps ,including compensation area, the proportion of the drillcompensation area to the preparation area, compensation volume and the maximum value of the compensation. The compensation frequency of the occlusal/incisal edge, axial surface and edge area of 0.5 mm preset radius group were recorded. Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Chi-square test using SPSS 22.0 software package. RESULTS: The preset drill radius and tooth position significantly affect the values of the four evaluation indicators(P<0.05) of the drill compensation space, among which the four evaluation index values were significantly reduced by the preset radius of the drill (P<0.05). The probability that the maximum drill compensation thickness value of incisor and molar teeth in the 0.5 mm group and all types of teeth in the 0.6 mm group exceeded 300 μm existed, the frequency of 20 μm gap compensation in the incisor/occlusal edge area, the axial surface area, and the edge area of the preparation decreased in turn(P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The preset radius of 0.3-0.4 mm can obtain a reasonable drill compensation gap on the tissue surface of the prosthesis. The occlusal/incisor area of the preparation needs to be carefully prepared to reduce the frequency of gap compensation.

Key words: Zirconium dioxide, CAD\CAM, Preset drill compensation radius, Drill compensation gap

CLC Number:

R783.1

GUO Ya-lin, PENG Jing-yuan, QIAN Dong-dong, MEI Zi-yu, MENG Xiang-feng. The influence of different preset drill radius and tooth position on the compensation gap of zirconium dioxide restoration[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2024, 33(6): 594-599.

References

[1] Laumbacher H, Strasser T, Knütte H, et al.Long-term clinical performance and complications of zirconia-based toothand implant-supported fixed prosthodontic restorations: a summary of systematic reviews[J]. J Dent, 2021, 111: 103723.
[2] Mazza LC, Lemos C, Pesqueira AA, et al.Survival and complications of monolithic ceramic for tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Prosthet Dent,2022, 128(4): 566-574.
[3] Mangano F, Veronesi G.Digital versus analog procedures for the prosthetic restoration of single implants: a randomized controlled trial with 1 year of follow-up[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2018: 5325032.
[4] Rues S, Zehender N, Zenthöfer A, et al.Fit of anterior restorations made of 3D-printed and milled zirconia: an in-vitro study[J]. J Dent,2023,130:104415.
[5] Larson TD.The clinical significance of marginal fit[J]. Northwest Dent,2012, 91(1): 22-29.
[6] Maske TT, Hollanders ACC, Kuper NK, et al.A threshold gap size for in situ secondary caries lesion development[J]. J Dent, 2019, 80: 36-40.
[7] Revilla-León M, Methani MM, Morton D,et al.Internal and marginal discrepancies associated with stereolithography (SLA) additively manufactured zirconia crowns[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2020, 124(6): 730-737.
[8] Hasanzade M, Aminikhak M, Afrashtehfar K,et al.Marginal and internal adaptation of single crowns and fixed dental prostheses by using digital and conventional workflows: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Prosthet Dent,2021,126(3): 360-368.
[9] Tuntiprawon M, Wilson PR.The effect of cement thickness on the fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns[J]. Aust Dent J, 1995, 40(1): 17-21.
[10] May LG, Kelly JR, Bottino MA, et al.Effects of cement thickness and bonding on the failure loads of CAD/CAM ceramic crowns: multi-physics FEA modeling and monotonic testing[J]. Dent Mater, 2012, 28(8): e99-e109.
[11] Kui A, Manziuc M, Petrutiu A, et al.Translucent zirconia in fixed prosthodontics-an integrative overview[J]. Biomedicines, 2023, 11(12): 3116-3133.
[12] Sadeqi HA, Baig MR, Al-Shammari M.Evaluation of marginal/internal fit and fracture load of monolithic zirconia and zirconia lithium silicate(ZLS) CAD/CAM crown systems[J]. Materials (Basel), 2021, 14(21): 6346.
[13] Felton DA, Kanoy BE, Bayne SC, et al.Effect of in vivo crown margin discrepancies on periodontal health[J]. J Prosthet Dent,1991, 65(3):357-364.
[14] Jacobs MS, Windeler AS.An investigation of dental luting cement solubility as a function of the marginal gap[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1991, 65(3): 436-442.
[15] Hasanzade M, Aminikhak M, Afrashtehfar K, et al.Marginal and internal adaptation of single crowns and fixed dental prostheses by using digital and conventional workflows: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2021,126(3): 360-368.
[16] Alghazzawi TF, Liu PR, Essig ME.The effect of different fabrication steps on the marginal adaptation of two types of glass-infiltrated ceramic crown copings fabricated by CAD/CAM technology[J]. J Prosthodont, 2012, 21(3): 167-172.
[17] Borba M, Cesar PF, Griggs JA, et al.Adaptation of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures[J]. Dent Mater, 2011, 27(11): 1119-1126.
[18] Kim JH, Jeong JH, Lee JH,et al.Fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated from conventional and digital impressions assessed with micro-CT[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2016, 116(4): 551-557.
[19] Piemjai M.Effect of seating force, margin design, and cement on marginal seal and retention of complete metal crowns[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2001, 14(5): 412-416.
[20] Tinschert J, Natt G, Hassenpflug S,et al.Status of current CAD/CAM technology in dental medicine[J]. Int J Comput Dent, 2004, 7(1): 25-45.
[21] Gegauff AG, Rosenstiel SF.Reassessment of die-spacer with dynamic loading during cementation[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1989, 61(6): 655-658.
[22] Vermilyea SG, Kuffler MJ, Huget EF.The effects of die relief agent on the retention of full coverage castings[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1983, 50(2): 207-210.
[23] Worley JL, Hamm RC, von Fraunhofer JA. Effects of cement on crown retention[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1982, 48(3): 289-291.
[24] McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique[J]. Br Dent J, 1971, 131(3): 107-111.
[25] Mou SH, Chai T, Wang JS, et al.Influence of different convergence angles and tooth preparation heights on the internal adaptation of Cerec crowns[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2002, 87(3): 248-255.
[26] Wilson PR.Effect of increasing cement space on cementation of artificial crowns[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1994, 71(6): 560-564.