Shanghai Journal of Stomatology ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 109-112.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2021.01.023

• Dental Education • Previous Articles    

Application of Vectra® 3D facial imaging technology in orthodontic teaching program

LIU Qian1, YAO Ying1, BI Hui-xian1, JIN Zuo-lin1, YANG Hong-xu2, GUO Tao3   

  1. 1. Department of Orthodontics, 2. Department of Oral Anatomy and Physiology and Temporomandibular Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Military Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Shaanxi Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, School of Stomatology, Air Force Military Medical University. Xi'an 710032, Shaanxi Province;
    3. Shanghai Tai Kang Bybo Dental Hospital. Shanghai 200001, China
  • Received:2020-02-11 Revised:2020-05-08 Online:2021-02-25 Published:2021-04-02

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of Vectra® 3D facial imaging technology in enhancing orthodontic teaching and training efficiency. METHODS: Thirty-two dental students, enrolled in 2014 as five-year and eight-year curriculum in School of Somatology, Air Force Military Medical University were selected as the subjects of this research. As an important teaching facility for training the students to practice orthodontic clinical examinations, 2D and 3D facial imaging systems were selected in this study for the students to collect and analyze the data relating to the facial complexion and appearance. The students were at first instructed to use the traditional 2D facial imaging system for 20 minutes, and then Vectra® 3D facial imaging system for another 20 minutes. The students were required to deliberate on the specifically designed questionnaires to input their own assessment on these two modalities. The outcomes were quantitatively analyzed using SPSS 24.0 software package. RESULTS: As to the items 2, 5, 6 and 7 in the questionnaire, which indicated the following queries respectively: whether the use of imaging systems could inspire students’ learning interest, whether the results drawn from these two imaging facial systems were accurate and reliable, whether the subjective bias were trivial , and whether these two imaging systems were feasible for orthodontic treatment appraisals. The results showed that there were significant differences in these four items between the two groups(P<0.05). As to the Items 1, 3 and 4 , namely, whether the acquisition of the teaching materials was an easy access, whether these two facial analytical regimes were beneficial for the students to obtain the new knowledge, and whether this specific teaching facility was easy for the students to manage, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Served as a new teaching syllabus facilitation, Vectra® three-dimensional facial imaging system demonstrates a more satisfactory impetus for the students to learn than the traditional two-dimensional imaging system. Pragmatically, the analytical data resulted from the former remains more accountable than that of the latter.

Key words: Orthodontic teaching syllabus, 3D facial imaging systems, Facial appearance analysis

CLC Number: