上海口腔医学 ›› 2024, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 543-547.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2024.05.018

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

玻璃纤维桩及二氧化锆全瓷冠在牙体缺损中的修复效果及影响因素分析

雷雨露1, 姜亚鹏2, 方首镕1   

  1. 1.山东省慢性病医院(山东省康复中心) 口腔科, 山东 青岛 266000;
    2.青岛市市北区人民医院 口腔科, 山东 青岛 266000
  • 收稿日期:2023-06-05 修回日期:2023-07-17 出版日期:2024-10-25 发布日期:2024-11-14
  • 通讯作者: 姜亚鹏,E-mail: 394792372@qq.com
  • 作者简介:雷雨露(1988- ),女,硕士研究生,主治医师,E-mail: fcleiyulu@126.com

Analysis of the effect and influencing factors of glass fiber post and zirconia all ceramic crown in repairing tooth defects

LEI Yu-lu1, JIANG Ya-peng2, FANG Shou-rong1   

  1. 1. Department of Stomatology, Shandong Provincial Chronic Disease Hospital (Shandong Rehabilitation Center). Qingdao 266000;
    2. Department of Stomatology, Shibei District People's Hospital. Qingdao 266000, Shandong Province, China
  • Received:2023-06-05 Revised:2023-07-17 Online:2024-10-25 Published:2024-11-14

摘要: 目的: 分析玻璃纤维桩联合二氧化锆全瓷冠在牙体缺损中的修复效果,探讨影响疗效的相关因素。方法: 选择2018年1月—2021年1月山东省慢性病医院收治的牙体缺损患者100例(患牙142颗)为研究对象,根据修复方式分为试验组(玻璃纤维桩联合二氧化锆全瓷冠修复)70例(98颗)和对照组(金属桩联合二氧化锆全瓷冠修复)30例(44颗)。术后6个月随访,比较2组患者牙体修复效果、牙龈出血指数(bleeding index,BI)、菌斑指数(plaque index,PLI)和牙周探诊深度(probing depth,PD)。根据试验组患者术后6个月修复效果分为修复欠佳组和修复良好组,采用单因素、多因素分析影响玻璃纤维桩联合二氧化锆全瓷冠修复效果的因素。采用SPSS 22.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果: 术后6个月,试验组A级、B级和C级占比分别为76.5%、20.4%、3.1%,对照组为50.0%、40.0%、10.0%,试验组牙体修复效果显著好于对照组(P=0.008)。术前,2组患者BI、PLI和PD无显著差异(P>0.05);术后6个月,试验组BI、PLI和PD显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。与修复良好组相比,修复欠佳组患者吸烟占比更多,台阶状断端形态占比更大(P<0.05)。以吸烟(是=1,否=0)、断端形态(台阶状=1,刃状=0)为自变量,以疗效(修复欠佳组=1,修复良好组=0)为因变量,Logistics回归分析显示,吸烟、断端形态是影响患者疗效的因素(P<0.05)。结论: 与金属桩二氧化锆全瓷冠修复相比,玻璃纤维桩联合二氧化锆全瓷冠修复效果更佳,但受到吸烟、断端形态影响,临床上可针对性制定干预措施。

关键词: 玻璃纤维桩, 二氧化锆全瓷冠, 牙体缺损, 修复效果, 影响因素

Abstract: PURPOSE: To analyze the repair effect of glass fiber post combined with zirconia all ceramic crown in tooth defects and explore the relevant factors affecting the therapeutic effect. METHODS: A total of 100 patients(142 teeth) with dental defects admitted to Shandong Provincial Chronic Disease Hospital from January 2018 to January 2021 were selected as the study subjects. They were divided into an experimental group (glass fiber post combined with zirconia all ceramic crown restoration) with 70 patients(98 teeth) and the control group (metal post combined with zirconium dioxide all ceramic crown) with 30 patients (44 teeth). Clinical follow-up was conducted 6 months after surgery to compare the differences in dental restoration effectiveness, gingival bleeding index (BI), plaque index (PLI), and probing depth (PD) between the two groups of patients. According to the 6-month postoperative repair effect of the experimental group, patients were divided into two groups: poor repair group and good repair group. Single factor and multi-factor analysis was used to analyze the factors affecting the repair effect of glass fiber post combined with zirconia all ceramic crown. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 22.0 software package. RESULTS: Six months after surgery, the proportion of grade A, grade B and grade C in the experimental group was 76.5%, 20.4% and 3.1%, respectively, while the control group was 50.0%, 40.0%, and 10.0%. The dental restoration effect in the experimental group was significantly better than that in the control group (P=0.008). Before surgery, there was no significant difference in BI, PLI and PD between the two groups of patients (P>0.05). Six months after treatment, the BI, PLI and PD in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.05). Compared with the group with good repair, the group with poor repair had a higher proportion of smoking and stepped broken end morphology (P<0.05). Using smoking (yes=1, no=0) and broken end shape (step shape=1, blade shape=0) as independent variables, and efficacy (poor repair group=1, good repair group=0) as dependent variables, logistic regression analysis showed the factors that smoking and broken end shape affected the treatment efficacy(P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with metal post zirconium dioxide all ceramic crown restoration, glass fiber post combined with zirconium dioxide all ceramic crown restoration is more effective, but its restoration effect is affected by smoking and the shape of the broken end. Clinical intervention measures should be taken to improve the restoration effect.

Key words: Glass fiber pile, Zirconia all ceramic crown, Dental defects, Repair effect, Influential factor

中图分类号: