上海口腔医学 ›› 2024, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3): 332-336.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2024.03.022

• 口腔医学教育 • 上一篇    

利用Florida探针评价规范化牙周探诊训练在本科生教学中的作用

许沐馨, 孙青   

  1. 常州市中医医院钟楼院区/常州市口腔医院 牙周病科,江苏 常州 213003
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-24 修回日期:2023-05-19 出版日期:2024-06-25 发布日期:2024-07-11
  • 通讯作者: 孙青,E-mail:jinghan6@163.com
  • 作者简介:许沐馨(1991-),女,硕士,主治医师,E-mail: 535192212@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    常州市卫健委重大科技项目(ZD202221)

Evaluation of the role of standardized periodontal probing training on the teaching of undergraduates using the Florida probe system

XU Mu-xin, SUN Qing   

  1. Department of Periodontics, Changzhou Stomatological Hospital/Changzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Zhonglou Branch. Changzhou 213003, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2023-03-24 Revised:2023-05-19 Online:2024-06-25 Published:2024-07-11

摘要: 目的:利用Florida探针系统评价规范化牙周探诊训练在本科生牙周临床探诊教学中的作用。方法:选取2022年5月—2022年11月于常州市口腔医院牙周病科实习的20名本科生作为研究对象,随机分为2组,每组10人。实验组接受规范化牙周探诊训练,对照组未接受训练,2组学生使用传统探针和Florida探针分别进行一例患者的左、右侧半口探诊,并由一名牙周专科医师使用Florida探针对同一患者进行全口探诊,与2组学生的探诊结果分别进行比较。采用SPSS 26.0 软件包对所得数据进行统计学分析。结果:牙周专科医师探诊深度(PD)值与实验组本科生无显著差异(P>0.05),而与对照组有显著差异(P<0.05)。对照组前牙区PD值与牙周专科医师无统计学差异(P>0.05),后牙区有统计学差异(P<0.05)。2组患者均认为,Florida探针系统探诊舒适度更高。结论:规范化牙周探诊训练有助于提高本科生临床探诊能力,使用Florida探针系统不仅可以评价教学效果,还可以提高患者舒适度,值得在本科生牙周探诊教学课程中进一步推广。

关键词: 牙周探诊, 规范化牙周探诊训练, Florida探针, 本科生教学

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of standardized periodontal probing training on the teaching of periodontal clinical probing for undergraduates by using Florida probe system. METHODS: Twenty undergraduates who practiced in the Department of Periodontology of Changzhou Stomatological Hospital from May 2022 to November 2022 were selected as the study objects and randomly divided into two groups with 10 students in each group. The experimental group received standardized periodontal probing training, while the control group did not receive training. Two groups of students used the traditional probe and the Florida probe to probe the left and right half-mouth teeth of one patient. In addition, a periodontal specialist used Florida probe to conduct full oral examination of the same patient, and the results were compared with those of the two groups of students. SPSS 26.0 software package was used for statistical analysis of the obtained data. RESULTS: There was no significant difference of probing depth(PD) between undergraduates and periodontal specialist in the experimental group (P>0.05), while there was significant difference in the control group (P<0.05). In the control group, PD values in the anterior area were not statistically different from those of periodontal specialist (P>0.05), while PD values in the posterior area were statistically different (P<0.05). Both groups of patients reported that the Florida probe system was more comfortable. CONCLUSIONS: Standardized periodontal probing training is helpful to improve the clinical probing ability of undergraduates. The use of Florida probe system can not only evaluate the teaching effect, but also improve the comfort level of patients, which is worthy of further application in the teaching course of periodontal probing for undergraduates.

Key words: Periodontal probing, Standardized periodontal probing training, Florida probe, Undergraduate teaching

中图分类号: