拔除下颌近中水平完全埋伏阻生牙保留颊侧骨板的效果探讨

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2024.01.017

上海口腔医学 ›› 2024, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 97-100.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2024.01.017

拔除下颌近中水平完全埋伏阻生牙保留颊侧骨板的效果探讨

徐震, 贾国栋^#, 汪轶^#

上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院口腔综合科,上海交通大学口腔医学院,国家口腔医学中心,国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心,上海市口腔医学重点实验室,上海市口腔医学研究所,上海 200011

收稿日期:2022-09-21 修回日期:2022-10-28 出版日期:2024-02-25 发布日期:2024-03-07
通讯作者: 贾国栋,E-mail：xtfjgd813@163.com;汪轶,E-mail: realwangyi@sina.com。^#共同通信作者
作者简介:徐震（1979-）,男,主治医师,E-mail：98xz@sina.com

Clinical observation of minimally invasive extraction of lower third molar by retaining the buccal bone plate

XU Zhen, JIA Guo-dong, WANG Yi

Department of General Dentistry, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology; Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology. Shanghai 200011, China

Received:2022-09-21 Revised:2022-10-28 Online:2024-02-25 Published:2024-03-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的: 探讨微创手术拔除下颌近中水平完全埋伏阻生牙时保留颊侧骨板的效果。方法: 选取近中低位水平埋伏阻生牙86颗,随机分为2组,试验组以球钻开窗,暴露牙冠远中面,保留颊侧骨板,使用仰角手机配合加长车针行多次T形截冠,去除牙冠,微创拔除。对照组采用球钻去除远中及颊侧骨板,暴露远中及颊部牙冠,T形截冠,其余操作均一致。观察2组患者术后肿胀程度、开口受限程度以及疼痛视觉模拟量表（VAS）评分,检测C反应蛋白水平以及抗溶血链球水平;1个月后检查邻近第二磨牙牙周探诊深度（probing depth,PD）、出血指数（bleeding index,BI）及临床附着丧失（clinical attachment loss,CAL）水平。采用SPSS 25.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果: 试验组术后肿胀程度显著轻于对照组（P<0.05）,开口受限与疼痛程度无显著差异（P>0.05）。试验组C反应蛋白水平显著高于对照组（P<0.05）,抗溶血链球菌水平2组之间比较无显著差异（P>0.05）。术后1个月,对照组PD和CAL均显著高于试验组（P<0.05）,2组BI比较无显著差异（P>0.05）。结论: 保留颊侧骨板微创拔除下颌近中水平完全埋伏阻生牙患者术后反应更轻,创口愈合更好。

关键词: 阻生牙, 微创拔牙, T形截冠, 颊侧骨板

Abstract: PURPOSE: To explore the effect of extracting the completely impacted teeth by minimally invasive surgery with preserving the buccal bone plate. METHODS: Eighty-six cases were selected and randomly divided into 2 groups. In the experimental group, a fenestration was made with a ball drill to expose the buccal and lingual margin of crown, and the buccal bone plate was preserved. T-shaped crown cuttings were performed, minimally invasive extraction was conducted.In the control group, the distal and buccal bone plates were removed with a ball drill, the distal and buccal crowns were exposed, and T-shaped crown was cut. The other procedures were the same. The degree of swelling, restricted mouth opening and VAS pain score after operation were observed, the levels of C-reactive protein and anti-hemolytic streptoglobulin were detected by laboratory tests, and the periodontal probing depth(PD), bleeding index (BI), and clinical attachment loss(CAL) of the adjacent second molar were examined 1 month after surgery. SPSS 25.0 software package was used for data analysis. RESULTS: The swelling degree of the two groups was significantly relieved in the experimental group than in the control group (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the degree of mouth opening limitation and pain (P>0.05). The level of C-reactive protein in the control group was significantly higher than that in the observation group (P<0.05). There was no significantly difference in the level of anti-hemolytic streptococcus between the 2 groups (P>0.05). One month after operation, the PD and CAL in the control group were significantly higher than those in the experimental group(P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in BI(P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The patients who preserve the buccal bone plate by minimally invasive extraction of impacted mandibular teeth have less reaction and better wound healing.

Key words: Impacted tooth, Minimally invasive tooth extraction, T-shaped crown-cutting, Buccal bone plate

中图分类号:

R782.1

徐震, 贾国栋, 汪轶. 拔除下颌近中水平完全埋伏阻生牙保留颊侧骨板的效果探讨[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(1): 97-100.

XU Zhen, JIA Guo-dong, WANG Yi. Clinical observation of minimally invasive extraction of lower third molar by retaining the buccal bone plate[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2024, 33(1): 97-100.

参考文献

[1] Negreiros RM, Biazevic MG, Jorge WA, et al.Relationship between oral health-related quality of life and the position of the lower third molar: postoperative follow-up[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2012, 70(4): 779-786.
[2] Gerbershagen HJ, Pogatzki-Zahn E, Aduckathil S, et al.Procedure-specific risk factor analysis for the development of severe postoperative pain[J]. Anesthesiology, 2014, 120(5): 1237-1245.
[3] Stojanovic S, Buric N, Tijanic M, et al.The assessment of prolonged inferior alveolar nerve blockade for postoperative analgesia in mandibular third molar surgery by a perineural addition of dexamethasone to 0.5% ropivacaine: a randomized comparison study[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2022, 19(3): 1324-1340.
[4] Tamimi Z, Al Habashneh R, Hamad I, et al.Efficacy of serratiopeptidase after impacted third molar surgery: a randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2021, 21(1): 91-99.
[5] Rizqiawan A, Lesmaya YD, Rasyida AZ, et al.Postoperative complications of impacted mandibular third molar extraction related to patient's age and surgical difficulty level: a cross-sectional retrospective study[J]. Int J Dent, 2022: 7239339.
[6] Kim JY.Third molar extraction in middle-aged and elderly patient[J]. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2021, 47(5): 407-408.
[7] Vranckx M, Fieuws S, Jacobs R, et al.Surgical experience and patient morbidity after third molar removal[J]. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2022, 123(3): 297-302.
[8] Moreira-Souza L, Butini Oliveira L, Gaêta-Araujo H, et al.Comparison of CBCT and panoramic radiography for the assessment of bone loss and root resorption on the second molar associated with third molar impaction: a systematic review[J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2022, 51(3): 20210217.
[9] Lago-Méndez L, Diniz-Freitas M, Senra-Rivera C, et al.Relationships between surgical difficulty and postoperative pain in lower third molar extractions[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2007, 65(5): 979-983.
[10] Hosgor H, Coskunses FM, Tokuc B.Correlation between preoperative pressure pain assessments and anxiety and postoperative pain in impacted lower third molar surgery[J]. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2021, 47(1): 15-19.
[11] Gay-Escoda C, Sánchez-Torres A, Borrás-Ferreres J, et al.Third molar surgical difficulty scales: systematic review and preoperative assessment form[J]. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2022, 27(1): e68-e76.
[12] Tuk JG, Yohannes LE, Ho JT, et al.Oral health-related quality of life after coronectomy for impacted mandibular third molar in the first postoperative week[J]. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2021, 26(5): e561-e567.
[13] Watson H, Hildebolt C, Rowland K.Pain relief with combination acetaminophen/codeine or ibuprofen following third-molar extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Pain Med, 2022, 23(6): 1176-1185
[14] Wang Y, Zhu X, Guo J, et al.Can kinesio taping improve discomfort after mandibular third molar surgery? a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2021, 25(9): 5139-5148.
[15] Kaye E, Heaton B, Aljoghaiman EA, et al.Third-molar status and risk of loss of adjacent second molars[J]. J Dent Res, 2021, 100(7): 700-705.
[16] Kunwar D, Koirala U, Manandhar A, et al.Association of prevalence of dental caries in mandibular second molar with impacted third molar[J]. J Nepal Health Res Counc, 2021, 19(2): 259-263.
[17] Pons-Vicente O, Valmaseda-Castellon E, Berini-Aytes L, et al.Effect on pocket depth and attachment level of manual versus ultrasonic scaling of lower second molars following lower third molar extraction: arandomized controlled trial[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2009, 107(3): e11-e19.

拔除下颌近中水平完全埋伏阻生牙保留颊侧骨板的效果探讨

Clinical observation of minimally invasive extraction of lower third molar by retaining the buccal bone plate

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	荆恒, 吕东升, 周贤, 李凯, 李宁毅. 舌侧楔形分牙法拔除下颌水平阻生第三磨牙的效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(4): 391-394.
[2]	赵君, 吴晓波, 刘娜, 周瑜, 郝新河. 口服右旋酮洛芬氨丁三醇在阻生牙拔除术中的超前镇痛：随机对照双盲试验[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(3): 298-301.
[3]	邵云, 程庆涛, 何欢, 李晶, 朱微燕, 刘嘉靓. 2种不同舒适化技术在60例高血压患者阻生牙拔除术中的应用评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(1): 109-112.
[4]	王鲲鹏, 袁逸杰, 朱嘉琪, 李博龙, 孟昭松, 张婷婷. 2种T形切冠法在下颌阻生智牙拔除术中的效果比较[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(5): 550-553.
[5]	周俊波, 吴妍慧, 张舜初, 汪铭, 韩源. 下颌阻生智牙不翻瓣拔除的临床效果观察[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(2): 221-224.
[6]	金晓明, 翟财红, 陶海彪, 江银华. 下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除同期植骨对第二磨牙远中牙槽骨缺损修复的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(1): 55-59.
[7]	黄宁, 夏斐然, 张月. 微创拔牙后延期种植与即刻种植的效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(6): 657-661.
[8]	江中军, 钟文群, 赵熠, 刘冰. 36例与阻生牙相关的牙源性角化囊肿的临床影像学特点分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(1): 97-99.
[9]	姜慧茜, 曹真胜, 孙浩, 胡涵, 方宇, 胡荣党. 替牙期上颌唇侧倒置埋伏中切牙治疗后牙周状况分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2016, 25(6): 697-701.
[10]	徐芳, 张慧霞. 微创拔牙法与传统拔牙法拔除下颌阻生智牙疗效比较[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2016, 25(5): 613-616.
[11]	任抒欣, 胡秀莲, 李健慧, 蒋析, 林野. Benex微创拔牙技术在前牙不翻瓣即刻种植中的临床应用[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2016, 25(3): 334-339.
[12]	杨映阳, 杜胜男, 吕宗凯. 高速涡轮机头和微创拔牙刀在下颌阻生牙拔除术中的应用效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2015, 24(4): 489-492.
[13]	汤屹群,万澎波,瞿冬琳. 心理护理在阻生牙拔除术中对患者焦虑情绪的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2015, 24(3): 367-369.
[14]	何锦泉,欧阳可雄,张清彬,周苗,杨子楠,朴正国. 2种切开翻瓣法拔除下颌智牙的临床效果分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2015, 24(2): 224-227.
[15]	蒋建江, 彭春梅. 固定正畸结合开窗导萌矫正下颌第一磨牙阻生[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2014, 23(2): 192-195.