基于下颌运动轨迹数据指导的数字化全冠咬合面精度评价

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2023.01.011

上海口腔医学 ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 58-62.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2023.01.011

基于下颌运动轨迹数据指导的数字化全冠咬合面精度评价

徐欣蕊, 余润平, 袁芸, 张洪铭, 黄慧

上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院口腔修复科,上海交通大学口腔医学院,国家口腔医学中心, 国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心,上海市口腔医学重点实验室,上海市口腔医学研究所,上海 200011

收稿日期:2021-11-11 修回日期:2022-01-19 出版日期:2023-02-25 发布日期:2023-06-12
通讯作者: 黄慧,E-mail：huanghui_68@126.com
作者简介:徐欣蕊（1996-）,女,住院医师,硕士研究生,E-mail：15900907936@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（81771105）

Assessment of the reproducibility of occlusal morphology for digital full crown designed by mandibular trajectory data

XU Xin-rui, YU Run-ping, YUAN Yun, ZHANG Hong-ming, HUANG Hui

Department of Prosthodontics, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine;; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology; Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology. Shanghai 200011, China

Received:2021-11-11 Revised:2022-01-19 Online:2023-02-25 Published:2023-06-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的: 定量比较基于下颌运动轨迹数据及平均值虚拟架指导设计的全冠修复体咬合面的精度。方法: 选择全口恒牙列完整、符合入组标准的15名志愿者作为研究对象,其中,男9例,女6例,平均年龄22~30岁。分别利用下颌运动轨迹数据及平均值虚拟架在修复设计软件中指导数字化全冠的咬合面设计,并分别与原始天然牙咬合面进行形态偏差比较。采用SPSS 25.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。结果: 基于下颌运动轨迹数据及平均值虚拟架指导设计的修复体咬合面总体偏差为平均正向偏差（269.9±63.1）和（318.7±51.3） μm,平均负向偏差（-175.8±78.2）和（-253.7±65.6） μm,均方根值（root mean square,RMS）（267.1±84.9）和（304.1±82.2） μm。修复体上解剖特征点在垂直方向上与原始天然牙咬合面相应解剖特征点的距离为近中颊尖（197.6±86.2）和(288.0±79.6) μm,远中颊尖（176.3±85.3）和（297.7±63.2） μm,近中舌尖（171.6±62.4）和（246.4±62.8） μm,远中舌尖（166.2±64.6）和（232.5±70.7） μm,中央窝（104.9±42.2）和（219.1±69.1） μm。2种方法指导设计的全瓷冠与原始天然牙咬合面的平均负向距离、RMS值以及在中央窝最低点和远中颊尖最高点的垂直距离具有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论: 下颌运动轨迹数据和平均值虚拟架指导设计的数字化全冠与原始天然牙咬合面形态存在一定差异,下颌运动轨迹数据组的偏差更小。

关键词: 下颌运动轨迹, 咬合面形态, CAD/CAM

Abstract: PURPOSE: To metrically assess the reproducibility of mandibular trajectory data and mean frame parameter in guiding the design of occlusal morphology of prosthesis. METHODS: Fifteen subjects with complete dentition were selected, including 6 females and 9 males, with an average age of 22-30 years old. The mandibular trajectory data and mean frame parameter were used to guide the design of occlusal morphology of the prosthesis in the CAD system, then the occlusal morphology was compared to the original natural teeth. The data were statistically analyzed by SPSS 25.0 software package. RESULTS: The general deviation of occlusal morphology between the prosthesis guided by mandibular trajectory data and mean frame parameter with the natural teeth was as follows: mean positive distance was (269.9±63.1) μm, (318.7±51.3) μm; mean negative distance was (-175.8±78.2) μm, (-253.7±65.6) μm; root mean square (RMS) was (267.1±84.9) μm and (304.1±82.2) μm. The vertical distance on mesial buccal cusp was (197.6±86.2) μm and (288.0±79.6) μm,distal buccal cusp was (176.3±85.3) μm and (297.7±63.2) μm, mesial lingual cusp was (171.6±62.4) μm and (246.4±62.8) μm, distal lingual cusp was (166.2±64.6) μm and (232.5±70.7) μm, central fossa was (104.9±42.2) μm and (219.1±69.1) μm. RMS, mean(-) and vertical differences of central fossa and distal buccal cusp were significantly different(P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The occlusal morphology of the prosthesis designed under the guidance of mandibular trajectory data and mean frame parameter both have significant differences with natural occlusion, but the deviation guided by mandibular trajectory data is lower.

Key words: Mandibular trajectory, Occlusal morphology, CAD/CAM

中图分类号:

R783.3

徐欣蕊, 余润平, 袁芸, 张洪铭, 黄慧. 基于下颌运动轨迹数据指导的数字化全冠咬合面精度评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(1): 58-62.

XU Xin-rui, YU Run-ping, YUAN Yun, ZHANG Hong-ming, HUANG Hui. Assessment of the reproducibility of occlusal morphology for digital full crown designed by mandibular trajectory data[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2023, 32(1): 58-62.

参考文献

[1] Williams WN, Lapointe LL, Thornby JI.Interdental thickness discrimination by normal subjects[J]. J Dent Res, 1974, 53(6): 1404-1407.
[2] Mörmann WH.The evolution of the CEREC system[J]. J Am Dent Assoc, 2006, 137(Suppl): 7S-13S.
[3] Koralakunte PR, Aljanakh M. The role of virtual articulator in prosthetic and restorative dentistry[J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2014, 8(7): ZE25-ZE28.
[4] Fang JJ, Kuo TH.Modelling of mandibular movement, computers in biology and medicine[J]. Comput Biol Med, 2008, 38(11-12): 1152-1162.
[5] Carossa M, Cavagnetto D, Ceruti P, et al.Individual mandibular movement registration and reproduction using an optoeletronic jaw movement analyzer and a dedicated robot: a dental technique[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2020, 20(1): 271-273.
[6] Hong SJ, Noh K.Setting the sagittal condylar inclination on a virtual articulator by using a facial and intraoral scan of the protrusive interocclusal position: a dental technique[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2021, 125(3): 392-395.
[7] Quinlan P.Articulators, face bows and interocclusal records[J]. J Ir Dent Assoc, 2016, 62(2): 102-104.
[8] Hsu MR, Driscoll CF, Romberg E, et al.Accuracy of dynamic virtual articulation: trueness and precision[J]. J Prosthodont, 2019, 28(4): 436-443.
[9] Kalman L, Chrapka J, Joseph Y.Digitizing the facebow: a clinician/technician communication tool[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2016, 29(1): 35-37.
[10] 林宗建, 陆家瑜, 吕成奇, 等. 4D下颌运动轨迹描记仪用于关系转移的精确性初探[J].口腔材料器械杂志, 2019, 28(1): 23-29.
[11] Litzenburger AP, Hickel R, Richter MJ, et al.Fully automatic CAD design of the occlusal morphology of partial crowns compared to dental technicians design[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2013, 17(2): 491-496.
[12] Kijak E, Lietz-Kijak D, Fraczak B, et al.Assessment of the TMJ dysfunction using the computerized facebow analysis of selected Parameters[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2015: 508069.
[13] Koralakunte PR, Aljanakh M. The role of virtual articulator in prosthetic and restorative dentistry[J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2014, 8(7): ZE25-ZE28.
[14] 陈智. 牙修复体的临床评价标准[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2019, 54(9): 612-617.
[15] Tamaki K, Ishigaki S, Ogawa T, et al.Japan Prosthodontic Society position paper on“occlusal discomfort syndrome”[J]. J Prosthodont Res, 2016, 60(3): 156-166.
[16] Kollmuss M, Kist S, Goeke JE, et al.Comparison of chairside and laboratory CAD/CAM to conventional produced all-ceramic crowns regarding morphology,occlusion,and aesthetics[J]. Clin Oral Invest, 2016, 20(4): 791-797.
[17] Li L, Chen H, Li W, et al.The effect of residual dentition on the dynamic adjustment of wear facet morphology on a mandibular first molar crown[J]. J Prosthodont, 2021, 30(4): 351-355.
[18] Litzenburger AP, Hickel R, Richter MJ, et al.Fully automatic CAD design of the occlusal morphology of partial crowns compared to dental technicians’ design[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2013, 17(2): 491-496.
[19] Oancea L, Stegaroiu R, Cristache CM.The influence of temporomandibular joint movement parameters on dental morphology[J]. Ann Anat, 2018, 218: 49-58.
[20] Suzuki Y, Shimpo H, Ohkubo C.Occlusal contact of fixed implant prostheses using functional biteimpression technique[J]. Implant Dent, 2015, 24(1): 42-46.
[21] Hassan B, Gimenez Gonzalez B, Tahmaseb A, et al.A digital approach integrating facial scanning in a CAD-CAM workflow for complete-mouth implant-supported rehabilitation of patients with edentulism: a pilot clinical study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017, 117(4): 486-492.
[22] Diker B, Tak Ö.Comparing the accuracy of six intraoral scanners on prepared teeth and effect of scanning sequence[J]. J Adv Prosthodont, 2020, 12(5): 299-306.

基于下颌运动轨迹数据指导的数字化全冠咬合面精度评价

Assessment of the reproducibility of occlusal morphology for digital full crown designed by mandibular trajectory data

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 11

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨华旋, 陈任生, 黄家辉, 孔海影, 张林林. 铒激光预处理对牙本质、牙釉质粘结强度及CAD/CAM玻璃陶瓷嵌体修复牙体缺损边缘微渗漏的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(3): 245-249.
[2]	金夏悦, 余润平, 花葳蕾, 黄慧. 1 374例椅旁CAD/CAM全瓷修复体的类型及颜色调查[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(2): 200-204.
[3]	佘文珺, 谢俊良, 焦婷. 下颌运动轨迹描计法确定无牙颌颌位关系的准确性评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(5): 497-500.
[4]	赵琛, 白月辉, 刘阳, 姜杉杉, 商庆龙, 赵甜甜, 袁硕, 李宁, 焦建平. 基牙抛光方式和时间对CAD/CAM氧化锆全瓷冠适合性的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(3): 236-240.
[5]	林晨官璐, 胡小坤, 严雨欣, 曲延慧, 刘梅, 章非敏. 2种椅旁CAD/CAM修复材料冠抗折强度的体外研究[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(1): 7-12.
[6]	吕继新, 于卫强, 佘文君, 翁维民. 不同基牙设计对CAD/CAM全瓷修复体抗折强度的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(6): 578-580.
[7]	连颂峰, 林敬凯, 蔡坤灿, 张晏祥. CAD/CAM纯钛烤瓷冠的抗疲劳性与抗折性分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(2): 118-122.
[8]	陈诚, 张琳梅, 任文豪, 高岭, 李少明, 程政, 郅克谦. 个性化重建板辅助游离腓骨重建上颌骨半侧缺损的优化设计[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(5): 455-460.
[9]	许辛夷, 张银莲, 耿芳惠. CAD/CAM氧化锆全瓷冠和金属烤瓷冠的临床应用及对牙周组织影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2017, 26(3): 331-335.
[10]	朱桂莲, 王仁飞, 陈鹤良. 底座黏结式个性化CAD/CAM氧化锆全瓷基台的临床应用[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2013, 22(6): 676-679.
[11]	丁晨, 俞青, 景建龙, 柳正明. 优化设计Upcera超透氧化锆全瓷修复体的临床应用[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2013, 22(5): 577-580.