下颌偏斜患者髁突位置的meta分析

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2018.02.019

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的:系统评价下颌偏斜患者髁突位置与个别正常▉髁突位置的差异。方法:计算机检索Pubmed、Embase、中国知网、万方数据库、维普、中国生物医学文献数据库,纳入所有关于下颌偏斜患者髁突位置的文章。检索时间截至2017年6月。由2名评价员独立进行资料提取和交叉核对后,采用RevMan5.3软件进行统计学分析。结果:共纳入6篇文献,均为下颌偏斜患者与个别正常▉髁突位置对照的研究。其中,下颌偏斜患者122例,个别正常▉110例。Meta分析结果表明,下颌偏斜组偏斜侧关节上间隙[MD=-0.38,95%CI(-0.74,-0.01),P=0.04]、前间隙[MD=-0.72,95%CI(-0.99,-0.04),P<0.00001]均显著大于偏斜对侧;下颌偏斜组偏斜侧关节后间隙[MD=-0.35,95%CI(0.25,0.45),P<0.00001]显著小于偏斜对侧;与个别正常▉相比,偏斜组偏斜侧关节后间隙[MD=-0.58,95%CI(-0.88,-0.28),P=0.0002]偏斜对侧关节后间隙[MD=-0.30,95%CI(-0.59,-0.00),P=0.05]及关节前间隙[MD=-0.85,95%CI(-1.58,-0.13),P=0.02]均显著小于对照组。偏斜组偏斜侧[MD=-0.56,95%CI(-1.14,0.02),P=0.06]及对侧关节上间隙 [MD=-0.58,95%CI(-1.27,0.10),P=0.10],偏斜组偏斜侧关节前间隙[MD=-0.05,95%CI(-0.35,0.46),P=0.80]与对照组相比,差异均无统计学意义。结论:下颌偏斜患者偏斜侧髁突位置较偏斜对侧向后下移位。与个别正常▉相比,下颌偏斜患者偏斜侧髁突位置向后移位。

关键词: 下颌偏斜, 髁突位置, Meta分析

Abstract: PURPOSE: This study was aimed to analyze the differences of condylar position between the mandibular deviation and the individual normal occlusion. METHODS: Databases of PubMed,Embase ,CNKI ,Wanfang ,VIP and CBL were searched for the relevant articles about condylar position with mandibular deviation. The deadline was June 2017.Data quality evaluation and extraction were independently conducted by two authors. Then meta analysis was performed using Rev Man 5.3 software. RESULTS: Six articles on controlled study of the condylar position in patients with mandibular deviation and individuals with normal occlusion were included. 122 patients had mandibular deviation and 110 had normal occlusion. Meta analysis results showed that the condylar superior space[MD=-0.38,95%CI(-0.74,-0.01),P=0.04]and anterior space[MD=-0.72,95%CI(-0.99,-0.04),P<0.00001]of the deviation side in mandibular deviation group were significantly greater than that of the opposite side; The condylar posterior space[MD=-0.35,95%CI(0.25,0.45),P<0.00001]of the deviation side in mandibular deviation group was significantly smaller than that of the opposite side. The condylar posterior space of deviation side[MD=-0.58,95%CI(-0.88,-0.28),P=0.0002],opposite side[MD=-0.30,95%CI(-0.59,-0.00),P=0.05] and the anterior space of opposite side[MD=-0.85,95%CI(-1.58,-0.13),P=0.02] in the mandibular deviation group was significantly smaller than that in the individuals with normal occlusion; the differences were statistically significant. There was no significant difference in the condylar superior space between the deviation side[MD=-0.56,95%CI(-1.14,0.02),P=0.06] and the opposite side[MD=-0.58,95%CI(-1.27,0.10),P=0.10] and the anterior space[MD=-0.05,95%CI(-0.35,0.46),P=0.80]in deviation side in the mandibular deviation group ,comparing with individuals with normal occlusion. CONCLUSIONS: The condylar position of deviation side in patients with mandibular deviation is posterior and inferior, comparing with the opposite side. The condylar position of deviation side in patients with mandibular deviation is posterior, comparing with the individuals with normal occlusion.

Key words: Mandibular deviation, Condylar position, Meta analysis

中图分类号:

R783.5

刘帅, 赵震锦, 赵瑞, 郑雪松, 王丽萍. 下颌偏斜患者髁突位置的meta分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(2): 210-215.

LIU Shuai, ZHAO Zhen-jin, ZHAO Rui, ZHENG Xue-song, WANG Li-ping. Meta-analysis of the condylar position with mandibular deviation[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2018, 27(2): 210-215.

参考文献

[1] 董研, 郭天文, 林丽红. 下颌偏斜对颜面形态和身体姿势的影响[J].中华医学美容杂志, 2000, 6(2): 111-113.
[2] 丁寅. 牙与颌面部不对称畸形的诊断与治疗[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2002, 18(2): 82-85.
[3] Mcneill C.Science and pacrtice of occlusion [M]. Hong Kong: Quinetsence Publishing Co. Inc., 1997: 273.
[4] 黄金芳, 傅民魁. 错▉畸形与颜面不对称畸形[J].中华口腔科杂志, 1979, 54(2): 65-69.
[5] Trenouth M.Comment on mandibular and facial asymmetries[J].Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1996, 109(2): 18A-19A.
[6] Polley JW, Figueora AA, Liou EJ, et al.Longitudinal analysis of mandibular asymmetry in hemifacial micorstomia[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg,1997, 99(2): 328-339.
[7] Kawakami M, Yamamoto K, Inoue M, et al.Morphological differences in the temporomandibular joints in asymmetrical prognathism patients[J]. Orthod Craniofac Res, 2006, 9(2): 71-76.
[8] 王红梅, 王邦康, 纪昌蓉, 等. 安氏Ⅲ类错▉伴有下颌偏斜患者髁突位置的研究[J].北京口腔医学, 2007, 15(1): 24-25.
[9] 周芳, 李东, 丁寅. 成人下颌偏斜患者颗下颌关节形态及位置的变化[J].临床口腔医学杂志, 2007, 23(3): 156-159.
[10] O'Byrn BL, Sadowsky C, Schneider B, et al. An evaluation of mandibular asymmetry in adults with unilateral posterior crossbite[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1995, 107(4): 394-400.
[11] 刘俊, 于美清, 董福生, 等. 成人骨性Ⅲ类错▉伴下颌偏斜髁突形态和位置的锥形束CT观察[J]. 中华口腔正畸学杂志, 2014, 49(7): 403-407.
[12] 杨智惠. 伴有或不伴有下颌偏斜的骨性Ⅲ类成人患者颞下颌关节形态和位置的CBCT研究[D]. 福州: 福建医科大学, 2015.
[13] Akahane Y, Deguchi T, Hunt NP.Morphology of the temporomandibular joint in skeletal Class Ⅲ symmetrical and asymmetrical cases: a study by cephalometric laminography[J].J Orthod, 2001, 28(2): 119-128.
[14] Cohlmia JT, Ghosh J, Sinha PK, et al.Tomographic assessment of temporomandibular joints in patients with malocclusion[J]. Angle Orthod, 1996, 66(1): 27-35.
[15] 张震康, 赵福运, 孙广熙, 等. 正常成年人颞下颌关节100侧X线分析[J].中华医学杂志, 1975, 55(2): 130-132.
[16] 吴莹莹. 成人下颌偏斜患者颞下颌关节形态对称性的三维CT分析研究 [D].西安: 第四军医大学, 2008.
[17] Zhang YL, Song JL, Xu XC, et al.Morphologic analysis of the temporomandibular joint between patients with facial asymmetry and asymptomatic subjects by 2D and 3D evaluation: A preliminary study[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2016, 95(13): e3052.
[18] Pullinger AG, Hollender L, Solberg WK, et al.A tomographic study of mandibular condyle in an asmptomatic population[J]. J Prosthet Dent,1985, 53(5): 706-713.
[19] Madsen B.Normal variations in anatomy, condylar movements,and arthrosis frequency of the temporomandibular joints[J]. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh), 1966, 4(3): 273-288.
[20] 赵燕平, 马绪臣, 邹兆菊, 等. 颅骨颞下颌关节侧位间隙X线检查的实验研究[J]. 现代口腔医学杂志, 1994, 8(1): 21-24.
[21] 王瑞永, 马绪臣, 张万林, 等. 健康成年人颞下颌关节间隙锥形束计算机体层摄影术测量分析[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2007, 39(5): 503-506.
[22] 刘木清, 傅开元. 髁突在关节窝中的位置及其在临床诊断治疗中的意义[J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2015, 8(1): 8-12.
[23] Bishara SE, Burkey PS, Kharouf JG.Dentaland facial asymmetries: a review[J]. Angle Orthod, 1994, 64(2): 89-98.
[24] Hwang HS, Hwang CH, Lee KH, et a1. Maxillofacial 3-dimensional image analysis for the diagnosis of facial asymmetry[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2006, 130(6): 779-785.
[25] Kurita H, Ohtsuka A, Kurashina K, et al.A study of factors for successful splint capture of anterior displaced temporomandibular joint disc with disc repositioning appliance[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2001, 28(7): 651-657.