不同浓度H2O2的桩表面处理对玻璃纤维桩与树脂水门汀黏结强度的影响

上海口腔医学 ›› 2013, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (5): 508-513.

不同浓度H2O2的桩表面处理对玻璃纤维桩与树脂水门汀黏结强度的影响

王静，王建鸿，郭菁，朱洪水

(南昌大学附属口腔医院口腔修复科，江西南昌 330006)

收稿日期:2013-04-12 修回日期:2013-05-10 出版日期:2013-10-10 发布日期:2013-10-10
通讯作者: 朱洪水，E-mail:zhs529@yahoo.com.cn
作者简介:王静(1987-)，女，硕士，E-mail:512660497@qq.com
基金资助:
江西省卫生厅科技计划课题(20131084)

The effect of H2O2 surface treatment of posts on the bond strength between glass fiber posts and the resin cement

WANG Jing, WANG Jian-hong, GUO Jing, ZHU Hong-shui

Department of Prosthodontics, the Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Nanchang University. Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi Province, China

Received:2013-04-12 Revised:2013-05-10 Online:2013-10-10 Published:2013-10-10
Supported by:
Supported by Science and Technology Plan Project of Department of Health of Jiangxi Province (20131084).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：研究不同浓度的H2O2表面处理对纤维桩与树脂水门汀之间黏结强度的影响。方法：选择2种不同种类的玻璃纤维桩各18支，随机分为6组，A组(对照组)、B组(单纯硅烷化处理)、C组(3%H2O2+硅烷化处理)、D组(10%H2O2+硅烷化处理)、E组(20%H2O2+硅烷化处理)和F组(30%H2O2+硅烷化处理)。将各组纤维桩与树脂水门汀进行黏结，形成圆柱状树脂块，将每个树脂块切割成7个1.0 mm厚的薄片进行推出实验，记录数据并采用SPSS13.0软件包对数据进行统计学分析。测试后的试件置于光学显微镜下，观察其破坏模式。结果：Tenax玻璃纤维桩黏结强度值A1-F1组分别为 (22.35±3.43) MPa 、(22.75±1.92) MPa、(27.21±3.60) MPa、(32.32±2.19) MPa、(36.15±2.32) MPa和(40.51±2.37) MPa，Macthpost玻璃纤维桩黏结强度值A2-F2组分别为(17.29±3.23) MPa、(17.01±3.18) MPa、(20.48±2.11) MPa 、(23.60±2.60) MPa 、(27.65±3.77) MPa和(30.52±2.99) MPa。Tenax及Matchpost组中，除了A组和B组无显著差异(P>0.05)外，其余每2组间相比，差异均有显著性(P<0.05)。结论：使用H2O2溶液处理Tenax及Matchpost玻璃纤维桩表面再涂以硅烷偶联剂，可明显提高2种玻璃纤维桩与树脂水门汀之间的黏结强度。30%H2O2溶液处理玻璃纤维桩表面的黏结强度最高，可使其更利于黏结。

关键词: H2O2, 树脂水门汀, 黏结强度, 表面处理

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of H2O2 on the push-out bond strength between glass fiber posts and the resin cement. METHODS: Eighteen Tenax glass fiber posts and 18 Macthpost glass fiber posts were randomly assigned to 6 groups according to the surface treatments. Group A, no surface treatment (control group); Group B, treated with silane agent; Group C, treated with 3% H2O2, then with silane agent; Group D, treated with10% H2O2, then with silane agent; Group E, treated with20 % H2O2, then with silane agent; Group F, treated with 30% H2O2, then with silane agent. The posts were adhered using the resin cement to form cylindrical resin block. Each resin block was sectioned to 7 sections of 1 mm thick. A push-out test was performed on other sections of each post to measure bond strengths. The date was recorded and analyzed with SPSS13.0 software package. The failure modes were examined with stereomicroscope. RESULTS: The bond strengths of Tenax post from A1 to F1 were (22.35±3.43) MPa, (22.75±1.92) MPa, (27.21±3.60) MPa, (32.32±2.19) MPa, (36.15±2.32) MPa and (40.51±2.37) MPa, respectively. The bond strengths of Macthpost post from A2 to F2 were (17.29±3.23) MPa, (17.01±3.18) MPa, (20.48±2.11) MPa, (23.60±2.60) MPa, (27.65±3.77) MPa and (30.52± 2.99) MPa, respectively. No significantly difference (P>0.05) was found between Group A and Group B, except other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with H2O2 followed with silane agent can significantly improve the bond strength between Tenax and Macthpost glass fiber posts and resin cement. The group treated with 30% H2O2 has the highest bond strength, and the treatment procedure is more useful to improve the adhesion of the glass fiber post.

Key words: H2O2, Resin cement, Bond strengths, Surface treatment

中图分类号:

R783.1

王静, 王建鸿, 郭菁, 朱洪水. 不同浓度H2O2的桩表面处理对玻璃纤维桩与树脂水门汀黏结强度的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2013, 22(5): 508-513.

WANG Jing, WANG Jian-hong, GUO Jing, ZHU Hong-shui. The effect of H2O2 surface treatment of posts on the bond strength between glass fiber posts and the resin cement[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2013, 22(5): 508-513.

参考文献

[1] Coelho CS, Biffi JC, Silva GR, et al. Finite element analysis of weakened roots restored with composite resin and posts[J]. Dent Mater J, 2009, 28(6): 671-678.
[2] Boschian Pest L, Cavani G, Bertani P, et al. Adhesive post-endodontic restorations with fiber post: push-out tests and SEM observations[J]. Dent Mater, 2002, 18(8): 596-602.
[3] Glazer B. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth with carbon fiber posts a prospective study[J].J Can Dent Assoc,2000,66(11): 613-618.
[4] Sahafi A, Peutzfeld A, Asmussen E, et al. Effect of surface treatment of prefabricated posts on bonding of resin cement[J]. Oper Dent, 2004, 29(1): 60-68.
[5] Vano M, Goracci C, Monticelli F, et al. The adhesion between fibre posts and composite resin cores: the evaluation of microtensile bond strength following various surface chemical treatments to posts[J]. Int Endod J, 2006, 39(1): 31-39.
[6] Monticelli F, Toledano M, Tay FR, et al. A simple etching technique for improving the retention of fiber posts to resin composites[J]. J Endod, 2006, 32(1): 44-47.
[7] 赵志华, 李晓杰, 左恩俊, 等. 不同桩表面处理对玻璃纤维桩与牙本质黏结强度的影响[J]. 大连医科大学学报, 2010, 32(2): 125-129.
[8] Yenisey M, Kulunk S. Effects of chemical surface treatments of quartz and glass fiber posts on the retention of a composite resin[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2008, 99(1): 38-45.
[9] Monticelli F, Toledano M, Tay FR, et al. Post-surface conditioning improves interfacial adhesion in post/core restorations[J]. Dent Mater, 2006, 22(7): 602-609.
[10] Goracci C, Raffaelli O, Monticelli F, et al. The adhesion between prefabricated FRC posts and composite resin cores: microtensile bond strength with and without post-silanization[J]. Dent Mater, 2005, 21(5): 437-444.
[11] Perdigao J, Comes G, Lee IK. The effect of silane on the bond strengths of fiber posts[J]. Dent Mater, 2006, 22(8): 752-758.
[12] Wrbas KT, Altenburger MJ, Schirrmeister JF, et al. Effect of adhesive resin cements and post surface silanization on the bond strengths of adhesively inserted fiber posts[J]. J Endod,2007,33(7): 840-843.
[13] Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Vallittu PK, et al. A structured analysis of in vitro failure loads and failure modes of fiber, metal, and ceramic post-and-core systems[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2004, 17(4): 476-482.
[14] Monticelli F, Osorio R, Sadek FT, et al. Surface treatments for improving bond strength to prefabricated fiber posts: a literature review[J]. Oper Dent, 2008, 33(3): 346-355.
[15] Aksornmuang J, Foxton RM, Nakajima M, et al. Microtensile bond strength of a dual-cure resin core material to glass and quartz fibre posts[J]. J Dent, 2004, 32(6): 443-450.
[16] Sarac YS, Sarac D, Kulunk T, et al. The effect of chemical surface treatments of different denture base resins on the shear bond strength of denture repair[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2005, 94(3): 259-266.