隐形矫治器上前牙内收过程中侧切牙不同附件设计的三维有限元分析

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2024.04.005

上海口腔医学 ›› 2024, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 360-366.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2024.04.005

隐形矫治器上前牙内收过程中侧切牙不同附件设计的三维有限元分析

陈精诚^1,2, 赵梦丽^2,3, 程志恒^1,2, 刘昕²

1.皖南医学院,安徽芜湖 241000;
2.安徽医科大学口腔临床学院（合肥市口腔医院）,安徽合肥 230000;
3.蚌埠医学院,安徽蚌埠 233000

收稿日期:2023-05-22 修回日期:2023-07-05 出版日期:2024-08-25 发布日期:2024-09-03
通讯作者: 刘昕,E-mail:closehun@163.com
作者简介:陈精诚（1996-）,男,医师,在读硕士研究生,E-mail: 1375020726@qq.com
基金资助:
合肥市卫生健康应用医学研究项目基金（Hwk2022yb035）

Three-dimensional finite element analysis of different attachment designs for lateral incisors during inward retraction of upper anterior teeth in clear aligner

CHEN Jing-cheng^1,2, ZHAO Meng-li^2,3, CHENG Zhi-heng^1,2, LIU Xin²

1. Wannan Medical College. Wuhu 241000;
2. School of Stomatology Clinical College of Anhui Medical University (Hefei Stomatological Hospital). Hefei 230000;
3. Bengbu Medical College. Bengbu 233000, Anhui Province, China

Received:2023-05-22 Revised:2023-07-05 Online:2024-08-25 Published:2024-09-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：探讨隐形矫治器在上前牙内收过程中侧切牙上不同形状附件的生物力学表达,为改善临床设计提供思路。方法：通过三维有限元技术将CBCT数据进行体外仿真,分别在侧切牙上设计无附件（A1）、矩形附件（A2）、楔形附件（A3）和弯弧形附件（A4）,利用Ansys计算相同载荷设计下侧切牙、牙列和隐形矫治器的三维变化及牙周膜等效应力（von Mises）分布。结果：侧切牙位移冠状向变化量A1>A4>A3>A2,矢状向变化量A3>A4>A1>A2,垂直向伸长量A4>A3>A1>A2;各组牙列整体位移呈现弓形趋势;隐形矫治器不同部位形变存在差异。A1与A2组牙周膜von Mises分布大致相似,A3组仅在根1/3舌侧区域出现应力集中,A4组牙颈部应力远大于A1组与A2组。结论：矩形附件与弯弧形附件在冠状向控制上具有优势,矩形附件在垂直向的控制效果最佳,附件受力面积与实际位移效率并不存在绝对关联,其受力面的形状会大幅度干扰具体力学表达效果。

关键词: 三维有限元分析, 隐形矫治器形变趋势, 侧切牙附件, 隐形矫治器

Abstract: PURPOSE: To investigate the biomechanical expression of different shapes of attachments on the maxillary anterior teeth during the lingual tooth movement process using clear aligners, providing new insights for orthodontists to improve the clinical design. METHODS: In this study, CBCT data were simulated using the three-dimensional finite element technique. Attachments of various shapes, including no attachment(A1), rectangular attachment(A2), wedge-shaped attachment(A3), and curved arc attachment(A4), were designed on the lateral incisors. Ansys software was employed to calculate the three-dimensional changes in the lateral incisors, dental arch, and clear aligners and the distribution of equivalent stress on the periodontal ligament(von Mises) under the same load conditions. RESULTS: The coronal displacement of the lateral incisors showed the following variations: A1>A4>A3>A2. The sagittal displacement exhibited the following variations: A3>A4>A1>A2. The vertical elongation demonstrated the following variations: A4>A3> A1>A2. The overall displacement of each dental arch displayed an arch-shaped trend. Different regions of the clear aligners exhibited variations in deformation. The von Mises distribution of the periodontal ligament in A1 and A2 group showed similarities, while A3 group exhibited stress concentration only in the lingual area of the root's one-third region. Group A4 experienced significantly higher stress in the cervical region compared to A1 and A2 group. CONCLUSIONS: Rectangular attachments and curved arc attachments possess advantages in coronal control, with rectangular attachments exhibiting the best control effect in vertical control. The area of attachment force and actual displacement efficiency do not have an absolute correlation, as the shape of the force-bearing surface can significantly affect its specific biomechanical expression.

Key words: Three-dimensional finite element analysis, Clear aligner deformation trend, Lateral incisor attachment, Clear aligner

中图分类号:

R783.5

陈精诚, 赵梦丽, 程志恒, 刘昕. 隐形矫治器上前牙内收过程中侧切牙不同附件设计的三维有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(4): 360-366.

CHEN Jing-cheng, ZHAO Meng-li, CHENG Zhi-heng, LIU Xin. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of different attachment designs for lateral incisors during inward retraction of upper anterior teeth in clear aligner[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2024, 33(4): 360-366.

参考文献

[1] Linjawi AI, Abushal AM.Adaptational changes in clear aligner fit with time[J]. Angle Orthod, 2022, 92(2): 220-225.
[2] Ben Gassem AA.Does clear aligner treatment result in different patient perceptions of treatment process and outcomes compared to conventional/traditional fixed appliance treatment:a literature review[J]. Eur J Dent, 2022, 16(2): 274-285.
[3] Zhang Y, Wang X, Wang J, et al.IPR treatment and attachments design in clear aligner therapy and risk of open gingival embrasures in adults[J]. Prog Orthod, 2023, 24(1): 1-8.
[4] Xia Q, He Y, Jia L, et al.Assessment of labially impacted canines traction mode with clear aligners vs. fixed appliance: a comparative study based on 3D finite element analysis[J].Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2022, 10: 1004223.
[5] Hong K, Kim WH, Eghan-Acquah E, et al.Efficient design of a clear aligner attachment to induce bodily tooth movement in orthodontic treatment using finite element analysis[J]. Materials (Basel), 2021, 14(17): 4926.
[6] Liu L, Song Q, Zhou J, et al.The effects of aligner overtreatment on torque control and intrusion of incisors for anterior retraction with clear aligners: a finite-element study[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2022,162(1): 33-41.
[7] Cheng Y, Liu X, Chen X, et al.The three-dimensional displacement tendency of teeth depending on incisor torque compensation with clear aligners of different thicknesses in cases of extraction:a finite element study[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2022, 22(1): 499-511.
[8] Seo JH, Eghan-Acquah E, Kim MS, et al.Comparative analysis of stress in the periodontal ligament and center of rotation in the tooth after orthodontic treatment depending on clear aligner thickness—finite element analysis study[J]. Materials (Basel), 2021, 14(2): 324-340.
[9] Liu L, Zhan Q, Zhou J, et al.Effectiveness of an anterior mini-screw in achieving incisor intrusion and palatal root torque for anterior retraction with clear aligners[J]. Angle Orthod, 2021, 91(6): 794-803.
[10] Jiang T, Wu RY, Wang JK, et al.Clear aligners for maxillary anterior en masse retraction:a 3D finite element study[J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1): 10156.
[11] Li Y, Xiao S, Jin Y, et al.Stress and movement trend of lower incisors with different IMPA intruded by clear aligner:a three-dimensional finite element analysis[J]. Prog Orthod, 2023, 24(1): 5-17.
[12] Sachdev S, Tantidhnazet S, Saengfai NN.Accuracy of tooth movement with in-house clear aligners[J]. J World Fed Orthod, 2021, 10(4): 177-182.
[13] Nucera R, Dolci C, Bellocchio AM, et al.Effects of composite attachments on orthodontic clear aligners therapy: a systematic review[J]. Materials(Basel), 2022, 15(2): 533-550.
[14] Haouili N, Kravitz ND, Vaid NR, et al.Has invisalign improved? a prospective follow-up study on the efficacy of tooth movement with Invisalign[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2020, 158(3): 420-425.
[15] Ayidaga C, Kamiloglu B.Effects of variable composite attachment shapes in controlling upper molar distalization with aligners: a nonlinear finite element study[J]. J Healthc Eng, 2021: 5557483.
[16] Laohachaiaroon P, Samruajbenjakun B, Chaichanasiri E.Initial displacement and stress distribution of upper central incisor extrusion with clear aligners and various shapes of composite attachments using the finite element method[J]. Dent J (Basel), 2022, 10(6): 114-123.

隐形矫治器上前牙内收过程中侧切牙不同附件设计的三维有限元分析

Three-dimensional finite element analysis of different attachment designs for lateral incisors during inward retraction of upper anterior teeth in clear aligner

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 12

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	韩祥永, 鞠雅琼, 张琳琳, 田芝娟. 聚醚醚酮用于上颌牙列缺失种植固定修复桥架的三维有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(4): 367-372.
[2]	霍美玲, 雷颖, 辛欣, 张颖, 王瑞梅. 2种矫治器对轻中度Ⅰ类错𬌗患者前牙牙根及牙槽骨的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(4): 407-410.
[3]	欧晓丽, 方志欣, 龙智灵, 罗海欧, 唐倩. 无托槽隐形矫治器内收前牙时后牙移动趋势及牙周膜应力分布[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(3): 239-244.
[4]	赵佳媛, 胡成思, 金玉, 张灵玲, 易芳, 陈君捷, 周娉, 卢燕勤, 李成日. 无托槽隐形矫治器伸长后牙效率的三维重叠分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(5): 556-560.
[5]	朱永翠, 朱凤节, 翟蕾, 崔淑霞. 无托槽隐形矫治器及自锁托槽矫治器对牙周炎患者牙周及龈下菌群的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(2): 184-188.
[6]	马晓晴, 项飞, 樊明月, 宋怡, 王晓慧, 张玲, 钱文昊. 微种植钉辅助无托槽隐形矫治器控制“过山车”效应的疗效分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(2): 193-197.
[7]	李琴, 赵旭春, 王明朗, 李媛媛, 彭怡. 不同矫治技术对牙周炎患者上切牙区牙槽骨改变的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(6): 651-655.
[8]	左书玉, 王璇, 吴海威, 张东升. 不同种植体外形设计对上颌窦提升术后种植体周围应力分布的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(4): 355-358.
[9]	马锐, 高洁, 卢存存, 葛振林. 无托槽隐形矫治器与固定矫治器对牙周状况影响的meta分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(4): 439-444.
[10]	王诗哲, 潘晓岗, 周可拓. 拔牙病例隐形矫治器设计的有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(3): 264-267.
[11]	王冠, 杨璐, 张玉峰, 罗三莲, 郑纪伟. 无托槽隐形矫治器和直丝弓矫治器对切牙牙根吸收的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2017, 26(1): 121-124.
[12]	何淞，陈周艳，杨四维，黄跃. 唇舌侧弓丝力学性能差异的三维有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2015, 24(6): 660-666.