上海口腔医学 ›› 2014, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (5): 593-596.

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

应用极坐标法分析美貌人群的软组织侧貌特征

王世兴1, 赵俊杰1, 冯妍1, 刘宗响2   

  1. 1.徐州市口腔医院 正畸科; 2.牙周病科,江苏 徐州 221002
  • 收稿日期:2013-09-10 修回日期:2013-11-26 出版日期:2014-10-20 发布日期:2015-02-04
  • 通讯作者: 刘宗响,Tel:0516-85866120,E-mail: zx_dentist@163.com
  • 作者简介:王世兴(1970-),男,学士,副主任医师,E-mail:xzkqwsx@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    徐州市科技发展项目(XZZD1370)

An analysis of soft tissue profile features of beautiful men and women with polar coordinates

WANG Shi-xing1, ZHAO Jun-jie1, FENG Yan1, LIU Zong-xiang2   

  1. 1.Department of Orthodontics; 2.Department of Periodontics, Xuzhou Stomatological Hospital. Xuzhou 221002, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2013-09-10 Revised:2013-11-26 Online:2014-10-20 Published:2015-02-04
  • Supported by:
    ; Supported by Science and Technology Development Fund of Xuzhou City (XZZD1370)

摘要: 目的 采用头影测量极坐标方法,对美貌汉族青年男女软组织侧貌进行比较。方法 按照纳入标准,选择某高校新入校大学生美貌志愿者62名(年龄18~23岁,平均年龄20.1岁,男女各半)为研究样本,采用自然头位拍摄头颅侧位定位片,以Bolton(Bo)点为极点,Bo-N线为极轴,建立极坐标系。分别测量男、女生颌面部软组织标志点的极坐标,采用SPSS 17.0软件包对测量结果进行统计学分析。结果 男、女样本各软组织标志点的极角项目值差异较小(P>0.05),无显著差异。线距项目值差异较大(P<0.01),差异显著。各标志点的极径与Bo-N的比值差异较小,无显著差异(P>0.05)。Bo-Pos/ Bo-Sn、Bo-LL/Bo-Pos比值差异较大,差异显著(P<0.05)。结论 极坐标方法应用于头影测量,可准确整体描述样本颅面侧貌特征,美貌男女之间差异表现在颏部及上、下唇突度。

关键词: 极坐标, 美貌人群, 软组织侧貌

Abstract: PURPOSE: To analyze the profile features of soft tissues of beautiful young men and women with Han nationality by polar coordinates. METHODS: Sixty-two beautiful college students (aged 18-23 years, average 20.1 years, 31 men, 31 women) were chosen according to inclusion criteria as study samples. The lateral cephalograms of the samples were taken in natural head position. The polar system was established with the Bolton (Bo) point as the pole, and the Bo-N line as the polar axis. The polar coordinates were measured of the mark points on the soft tissues of the samples’ maxillofacial regions respectively. The measured data were statistically analyzed with SPSS 17.0 software package. RESULTS: There were no significant differences among the polar angles of the marking points on the soft tissues (P>0.05), the results were not statistically significant; there were significant differences among the measured data of line distances (P<0.01); the ratios of the polar radius of each mark point and Bo-N were not significantly different (P>0.05); there were significant differences among the values of Bo-Pos/ Bo- Sn, Bo- LL/Bo-Pos between men and women, which was statistically significant (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Polar coordinates can be applied to cephalometry to accurately and integrally describe maxillofacial profile features. There are minor differences between the profile features of beautiful men and women, and the differences are mainly shown in mandible and the fullness of lips.

Key words: Polar coordinates, Beautiful people, Soft tissue profile