年轻美貌人群颜面美学评判分析

上海口腔医学 ›› 2014, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (5): 586-589.

年轻美貌人群颜面美学评判分析

曲靖¹, 路瑆¹, 葛红珊², 刘维佳¹, 支强¹, 王迪侃¹

1.南昌大学口腔医学院,江西南昌 330006; 2.南昌大学附属口腔医院,江西南昌 330006

收稿日期:2013-10-08 修回日期:2013-12-10 出版日期:2014-10-20 发布日期:2015-02-04
通讯作者: 葛红珊,E-mail:qiugehongshan@sina.com
作者简介:曲靖(1991-),女,在读本科生,E-mail:1527578151@qq.com
基金资助:
江西省科学技术厅二零零九零五科技支撑计划

Evaluation of facial aesthetics in young population with beautiful faces in Nanchang city

QU Jing¹, LU Xing¹, GE Hong-shan², LIU Wei-jia¹, ZHI Qiang¹, WANG Di-kan¹

1. Nanchang University School of Stomatology. Nanchang 330006; 2. Stomatological Hospital Affiliated Nanchang University. Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi Province,China

Received:2013-10-08 Revised:2013-12-10 Online:2014-10-20 Published:2015-02-04
Supported by:
; Supported by No 200905 Science and Technology Supporting Project of Department of Science and Technology of Jiangxi Province

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的分析不同层次人群对南昌市海选的年轻美貌男女正侧面美学审美标准,以指导正畸临床工作。方法从南昌市各大高校中海选的赣籍青年美貌男女中选出14名年轻美貌男生和15名年轻美貌女生,近期拍摄正、侧面近观照片。由10名口腔正畸医师和85名不同年龄、不同性别的非口腔正畸专业人员独立对所有照片进行美学评判,分别选出各自心目中的最美貌年轻男女各1名,进行分组比较。结果正畸医师对于青年男女面容美学评判存在明显差异,10名评判者结果差异极大,尤其对男生评判各不相同;非正畸专业人员对于年轻男女面容美学评判存在差异,但对于男生评判的统一性较女生高。具体来说,年轻人评判结果是男生13号、女生1号,年长者评判结果是男生7号、女生9号。男性评判者的结果是男生7号和13号、女生1号和9号,女性评判者的结果是男生13号、女生1号。结论不论是正畸医师或非正畸专业人员,对于年轻男女面部美学评判标准均存在明显差异。提示正畸临床上对于矫治中患者面部的改善,应尊重患者及家属意见。

关键词: 美貌人群, 面部美学, 年轻男女

Abstract: PURPOSE: To analyze the full-face and lateral aesthetical standards among fine looking young people in Jiangxi province, in order to provide reference for orthodontic treatment. METHODS: Fourteen young males and fifteen young females from universities in Nanchang city were selected through audition of young beauty within Jiangxi province. Their full-face and lateral pictures were then taken. Ten orthodontists and 85 non-orthodontists in different ages and sexuality who were randomly selected were asked to rank all of the selected pictures in descending order of attractiveness independently and also pick out the most beautiful male and female photos according to their own judgments. Comparisons were carried out to select the universally recognized beautiful males and females and analyze their soft tissue facial profile. RESULTS: Orthodontists held significantly different opinions on the facial esthetic profile for males and females, especially for males. On the other hand, although the non-professionals also had different views on the profiles, the evaluations for males were quite consistent. To be specific, young people selected No.13 male and No.1 female while the old people preferred to select No.7 male and the No.9 female. At the same time, men selected No.7 and No.13 male, and No.1 and No.9 female while women selected No.13 male and No.1 female. CONCLUSIONS: Both orthodontists and non-orthodontists have different opinions on the facial esthetic profile for young males and females. During orthodontic treatments, orthodontists should respect the opinions of the patients and their family members on the matter of facial improvements.

Key words: Fine-looking population, Facial aesthetics, Young male and female

曲靖, 路瑆, 葛红珊, 刘维佳, 支强, 王迪侃. 年轻美貌人群颜面美学评判分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2014, 23(5): 586-589.

QU Jing, LU Xing, GE Hong-shan, LIU Wei-jia, ZHI Qiang, WANG Di-kan. Evaluation of facial aesthetics in young population with beautiful faces in Nanchang city[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2014, 23(5): 586-589.

参考文献

[1] Mantzikos T. Esthetic soft tissue profile preferences among the Japanese population [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1998, 114(1): 1-7.
[2] 于晓惠, 黄金芳. 180例正常颌北京汉族人软组织侧貌X线头影测量研究 [J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 1987, 22(4): 222-226.
[3] 王媛媛, 郭丛丛, 周晨, 等. 正畸患者对侧貌面型审美偏好的调查研究 [J]. 上海口腔医学, 2012, 21(6): 672-688.
[4] Orsini MG, Huang GJ, Kiyak HA, et al. Methods to evaluate profile preferences for the anteroposterior position of the mandible [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2006, 130 (3): 283-291.
[5] Mejia-Maidl M, Evans CA, Viana G, et al. Preferences for facial profiles between Mexican Americans and Caucasians [J]. Angle Orthod, 2005, 75(6): 953-958.
[6] 邹冰爽, Mananzini AL, 曾应魁. 应用数字图像处理技术对颜面审美观的研究 [J]. 口腔正畸学杂志, 2000, 7(3): 107-110.
[7] 吕婴, 张学军. 中国人颜面侧貌审美的调查分析[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2000, 35(3): 224-226.
[8] 祖青, 米丛波, 聂晶, 等. 中国美貌女性颏部软组织形态的比例分析[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2011,15(22):4065-4068.
[9] 李天成, 彭诚, 张爽. 中国美貌人群软组织侧貌美学研究 [J]. 天津医药, 2011, 39(8): 723-726.
[10] Shimomura T, Ioi H, Nakata S, et al. Evaluation of well-balanced lip position by Japanese orthodontic patients[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2011, 139(4): 291-297.
[11] Cala L, Spalj S, Slaj M, et al. Facial profile preferences: differences in the perception of children with and without orthodontic history [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2010, 138(4): 442-450.
[12] Richard UJ. Structural correlates of feminine beauty preference in Britain and the United States: a comparison[J]. Sociol Soc Res, 1965, 49(3): 330-342.