上颌牙列缺失患者种植支持固定修复前后唇部美学区软组织的变化

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2024.04.008

上海口腔医学 ›› 2024, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 381-386.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2024.04.008

上颌牙列缺失患者种植支持固定修复前后唇部美学区软组织的变化

张筠, 陶星如, 王凤, 于德栋^#, 吴轶群^#

上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院口腔第二门诊部,上海交通大学口腔医学院,国家口腔医学中心, 国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心,上海市口腔医学重点实验室,中国医学科学院口腔颌面再生医学创新单元,上海 201999

收稿日期:2023-05-25 修回日期:2023-07-15 出版日期:2024-08-25 发布日期:2024-09-03
通讯作者: 吴轶群,E-mail: yiqunwu@hotmail.com;于德栋,E-mail: yudedong@sjtu.edu.cn。^#共同通信作者
作者简介:张筠（1998-）,女,在读博士研究生,E-mail: jizhijiu11048@163.com
基金资助:
黄浦区产业扶持基金（XK2020014）; 申康医院发展中心促进市级医院临床技能与临床创新能力三年行动计划（SHDC2020CR3049B）; 中国医学科学院医学与健康科技创新工程项目（2019-I2M-5-037）; 上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院口腔医学研究型学科基金 (KQYJXK2020)

Facial soft tissue changes after full-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses restoration in patients with edentulous maxilla

ZHANG Yun, TAO Xing-ru, WANG Feng, YU De-dong, WU Yi-qun

Department of Second Dental Center, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University; National Center for Stomatology; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology; Research Unit of Oral and Maxillofacial Regenerative Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Shanghai 201999, China

Received:2023-05-25 Revised:2023-07-15 Online:2024-08-25 Published:2024-09-03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：探讨上颌牙列缺失患者种植固定修复治疗前后鼻唇部软组织的变化及其影响因素。方法：选择2016年1月—2023年7月于上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院口腔第二门诊行上颌全牙弓种植固定修复的患者50例。收集患者修复前后的病史、CBCT和三维面部扫描数据,采用配对t检验或Wilcoxon符号秩和检验比较患者戴牙前后软组织的改变,将各变化量与患者基本信息、种植方案和剩余骨相关参数进行双变量相关分析。使用赤池信息准则选择各软组织指标变化量的多元线性回归模型。结果：种植固定修复后,上唇长（sn-sto）、上唇红长（ls-sto）、上唇红面积（UVA）显著增加（P<0.01）,上唇凸点到E线的距离（ls-E）显著减少（P<0.01）,鼻唇角（∠cm-sn-ls）显著减小（P<0.01）,人中长（sn-ls）无显著改变（P>0.05）。除sn-sto和sn-ls外,其余软组织改变量均与年龄呈正相关关系（P<0.01）,其余骨组织参数、种植方案、性别与各软组织改变量无显著相关性。多元逐步后退回归分析显示,各软组织变化量与年龄和术前软组织情况广泛相关,个别与骨形态相关。结论：上颌牙列缺失患者种植固定修复后鼻唇部软组织发生显著变化,主要为唇红部扩大和突出。面部软组织变化主要与患者年龄及原有软组织条件广泛相关;患者年龄越大、原有软组织形态越凹陷萎缩,丰满度改善越明显,唇部凸度改变量与剩余骨形状也存在相关性。

关键词: 美学修复, 牙列缺失, 种植支持固定修复, 侧貌, 线性相关性

Abstract: PURPOSE: To investigate the changes of nasolabial soft tissues before and after full-arch implant supported fixed restoration in maxillary edentulous patients and the influencing factors of the changes. METHODS: Fifty patients who underwent full-arch implant fixed restoration in the Department of Second Dental Center of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital from January 2016 to July 2023 were selected. Patient's medical history, CBCT, and three-dimensional facial scan data were collected before and after restoration. Paired t test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to compare the changes in soft tissues before and after restoration. The correlation between changes and patient's basic information, implant protocol and residual bone parameters were analyzed using bivariate correlation analysis. Akaike information criterion was used to select the multivariate linear regression model of each soft tissue index change. RESULTS: After implant fixed restoration, the upper lip height (sn-sto), the upper vermillion height (ls-sto), and the upper vermilion area (UVA) significantly increased (P<0.01), while the distance from ls to the E-line (ls-E) significantly decreased (P<0.01), the nasolabial angle (∠cm-sn-ls) significantly decreased (P<0.01), and the cutaneous upper lip height(sn-ls) did not change significantly(P>0.05). Except for sn-sto and sn-ls, the remaining soft tissue changes were positively correlated with age (P<0.01). Other residual bone parameters, implant protocol, and gender were not significantly related to each soft tissue change. Multivariate stepwise regression analysis showed that each soft tissue change was broadly related to age and preoperative soft tissue condition, and partially related to bone morphology. CONCLUSIONS: The nasolabial soft tissues of maxillary edentulous patients change significantly after implant fixed restoration, mainly the expansion and protrusion of the red part of the lip. The changes in facial soft tissues are primarily related to the patient's age and pre-existing soft tissue condition, with older patients and those with more atrophic original soft tissue morphology observing more apparent improvements in fullness. The change in lip prominence is also related to the residual bone shape.

Key words: Aesthetic restoration, Edentulism, Implant-supported fixed restoration, Facial profile, Linear correlation

中图分类号:

R783.4

张筠, 陶星如, 王凤, 于德栋, 吴轶群. 上颌牙列缺失患者种植支持固定修复前后唇部美学区软组织的变化[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(4): 381-386.

ZHANG Yun, TAO Xing-ru, WANG Feng, YU De-dong, WU Yi-qun. Facial soft tissue changes after full-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses restoration in patients with edentulous maxilla[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2024, 33(4): 381-386.

参考文献

[1] 李星儒, 陈立强, 李亚莉, 等. 正颌手术对患者心身症状的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2015, 24(1): 107-110.
[2] Chen W, Qian W, Wu G, et al.Three-dimensional human facial morphologies as robust aging markers[J]. Cell Res, 2015, 25(5): 574-587.
[3] Ali Z, Baker SR, Shahrbaf S, et al. Oral health-related quality of life after prosthodontic treatment for patients with partial edentulism: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2019, 121(1): 59-68.e53.
[4] Doundoulakis JH, Eckert SE, Lindquist CC, et al.The implant-supported overdenture as an alternative to the complete mandibular denture[J]. J Am Dent Assoc, 2003, 134(11): 1455-1458.
[5] Pucciarelli MGR, Hideki de Lima Toyoshima G, de Oliveira TM, et al. Quantifying the facial proportions in edentulous individuals before and after rehabilitation with complete dentures compared with dentate individuals: a 3D stereophotogrammetry study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2022: S0022-3913(22)00188-3.
[6] MacBeth ND, Donos N, Mardas N. Alveolar ridge preservation with guided bone regeneration or socket seal technique. a randomised, single-blind controlled clinical trial[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2022, 33(7): 681-699.
[7] Cawood JI, Howell RA.A classification of the edentulous jaws[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1988, 17(4): 232-236.
[8] Wang F, Tao B, Shen Y, et al.A single-arm clinical trial investigating the feasibility of the zygomatic implant quad approach for Cawood and Howell Class 4 edentulous maxilla: an option for immediate loading[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2021, 23(5): 800-808.
[9] Lekholm U, Zarb GA.Patient selection and preparation[C]//PI Brånemark, GA Zarb, T Albrektsson, et al. Tissue-integrated prostheses. osseointegration in clinical dentistry[M]. Chicago: Quintessence, 1985: 199-209.
[10] Chong Y, Dong R, Liu X, et al.Stereophotogrammetry to reveal age-related changes of labial morphology among Chinese women aging from 20 to 60[J]. Skin Res Technol, 2021, 27(1):41-48.
[11] Wamalwa P, Amisi SK, Wang Y, et al.Angular photogrammetric comparison of the soft-tissue facial profile of Kenyans and Chinese[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2011, 22(3):1064-1072.
[12] Swift A, Liew S, Weinkle S, et al.The facial aging process from the "inside out"[J]. Aesthet Surg J, 2021, 41(10): 1107-1119.
[13] Fedok FG, Lighthall JG.Evaluation and treatment planning for the aging face patient[J]. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am, 2022, 30(3): 277-290.
[14] Pucciarelli M, Hideki de Lima Toyoshima G, de Oliveira T, et al. Quantifying the facial proportions in edentulous individuals before and after rehabilitation with complete dentures compared with dentate individuals: a 3D stereophotogrammetry study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2022: S0022-3913(22)00188-3.
[15] Quirynen M, Lahoud P, Teughels W, et al.Individual "alveolar phenotype" limits dimensions of lateral bone augmentation[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2023, 50(4): 500-510.
[16] Urban IA, Monje A, Lozada JL, et al.Long-term evaluation of peri-implant bone level after reconstruction of severely atrophic edentulous maxilla via vertical and horizontal guided bone regeneration in combination with sinus augmentation: a case series with 1 to 15 years of loading[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2017, 19(1): 46-55.
[17] Chiapasco M, Casentini P.Horizontal bone-augmentation procedures in implant dentistry: prosthetically guided regeneration[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2018, 77(1): 213-240.
[18] Jung J, Lee CH, Lee JW, et al.Three dimensional evaluation of soft tissue after orthognathic surgery[J]. Head Face Med, 2018, 14(1): 21-28.
[19] Hao K, Luo J, Di P, et al.Morphometry and displacement analysis of the upper lips following maxillary full-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses: a 3D morphometric study[J]. BMC Oral Health, 2021, 21(1): 461-472.
[20] Liu ZY, Chen G, Dai FF, et al.Analysis of correlation of 3-dimensional lip vermilion morphology and dentoskeletal forms in young Chinese adults on the basis of sex and skeletal patterns[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2021, 159(5): e423-e437.
[21] 王艳,廖正宇,赖文莉, 等. 侧貌美观评价的调查初探[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2008, 43(8): 468-471.
[22] Kuroda S, Sugahara T, Takabatake S, et al.Influence of anteroposterior mandibular positions on facial attractiveness in Japanese adults[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2009, 135(1): 73-78.
[23] Ioi H, Shimomura T, Nakata S, et al.Comparison of anteroposterior lip positions of the most-favored facial profiles of Korean and Japanese people[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2008, 134(4): 490-495.
[24] 吕婴, 张学军中国人颜面侧貌审美的调查分析[J]. 中华口腔医学杂志, 2000, 35(3): 224-226.
[25] 蔡承霖, 叶年嵩, 袁玲君, 等. 不同观察者对唇部突度影响面部美学评价的差异比较[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(6): 611-617.

上颌牙列缺失患者种植支持固定修复前后唇部美学区软组织的变化

Facial soft tissue changes after full-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses restoration in patients with edentulous maxilla

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	韩祥永, 鞠雅琼, 张琳琳, 田芝娟. 聚醚醚酮用于上颌牙列缺失种植固定修复桥架的三维有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(4): 367-372.
[2]	陶星如, 张筠, 张佳园, 魏凌飞, 聂萍, 于德栋. 上颌无牙患者种植即刻过渡义齿修复后侧貌软组织的轮廓变化[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(4): 373-380.
[3]	吕晓蕾, 史俊宇, 钱姝娇, 赖红昌. 上颌前牙美学区单颗种植修复体应用角度螺丝通道系统基台和预成钛基台的短期临床疗效比较[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(4): 423-428.
[4]	王雪纯, 汪涌, 许晓波, 郝新河. 数字化冠延长导板在前牙美学修复中的应用效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(3): 260-264.
[5]	王媛媛, 包柏成, 谢奇, 郝春波. 正畸患者对自身侧貌面下1/3高度感知能力的调查分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(1): 60-64.
[6]	张书宇, 董华. 上海市嘉定区65~74岁老年人群牙列缺损及修复现状调查[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(5): 522-525.
[7]	董正杰, 徐侃. 上颌中切牙长轴与牙槽骨方向夹角的锥形束CT测量分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2017, 26(4): 458-460.
[8]	罗蓉, 罗军, 夏罗英. 口腔种植修复在牙列缺失患者中的应用效果及对龈沟液中TNF-α、IL-6、IL-8的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2017, 26(3): 324-327.
[9]	姜威, 铃木阳. 日本骨性Ⅰ类错牙合畸形儿童颜面生长发育的纵向分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2016, 25(3): 357-363.
[10]	陈双喜，唐国华，蒋雨楠，顾永佳，章婷，高美琴. 高转矩自锁托槽拔牙矫治上颌前突的效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2015, 24(6): 739-742.
[11]	王世兴, 赵俊杰, 冯妍, 刘宗响. 应用极坐标法分析美貌人群的软组织侧貌特征[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2014, 23(5): 593-596.
[12]	孟康, 于鑫玮, 高承志. 新疆汉族与维吾尔族成人侧貌特征分析与比较[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2014, 23(4): 489-493.
[13]	王媛媛;郭丛丛;周晨;范明玲;王伟财;包柏成. 正畸患者对侧貌面型审美偏好的调查研究 [J]. 上海口腔医学, 2012, 21(6): 668-672.
[14]	石庆娟;张翼;邓锋;郑鸿;张赫;王华桥. 骨性Ⅲ类错?正颌术后侧貌预测及评价 [J]. 上海口腔医学, 2012, 21(5): 556-562.
[15]	许少平;骆小平;石玉娟. 热压铸造陶瓷制作前牙瓷贴面的临床效果观察 [J]. 上海口腔医学, 2012, 21(5): 572-575.