基于CBCT及三维重建技术对下颌阻生第三磨牙舌侧骨板厚度及形态的研究

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2023.06.018

上海口腔医学 ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 661-667.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2023.06.018

基于CBCT及三维重建技术对下颌阻生第三磨牙舌侧骨板厚度及形态的研究

赵君^1,2,3, 吴晓波^1,2,3, 刘娜⁴, 郝新河^1,2,3

1.安徽医科大学合肥口腔临床学院,安徽合肥 230001;
2.安徽医科大学第五临床医学院,安徽合肥 230022;
3.合肥市口腔医院口腔颌面外科,安徽合肥 230001;
4.安徽医科大学第一附属医院口腔科,安徽合肥 230022

收稿日期:2023-04-12 修回日期:2023-07-21 出版日期:2023-12-25 发布日期:2024-01-12
通讯作者: 刘娜,E-mail:hxnana@foxmail.com
作者简介:赵君(1981-),男,博士,副主任医师,E-mail:ykzj1981@126.com
基金资助:
2022年安徽医科大学校科研基金（2022xkj257）

Study on the thickness and morphology of lingual bone of impacted mandibular third molar based on CBCT and Simplant 3D reconstruction

ZHAO Jun^1,2,3, WU Xiao-bo^1,2,3, LIU Na⁴, HAO Xin-he^1,2,3

1. Hefei Clinical School of Stomatology, Anhui Medical University. Hefei 230001;
2. The Fifth Clinical College of Medicine, Anhui Medical University. Hefei 230022;
3. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hefei Stomatology Hospital. Hefei 230001;
4. Department of Oral Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University. Hefei 230022, Anhui Province, China

Received:2023-04-12 Revised:2023-07-21 Online:2023-12-25 Published:2024-01-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的: 通过定量测量舌侧骨板厚度,探讨下颌阻生第三磨牙与舌侧骨板厚度的潜在关系,建立舌侧骨板的三维可视化模型。方法: 收集合肥市口腔医院数据库中符合研究标准的200例下颌阻生第三磨牙影像资料,通过Simplant Pro软件对不同测量位点的舌侧骨板进行厚度测量和三维重建。采用SPSS 22.0软件包对数据进行统计分析,不同测量位点的舌侧骨板厚度的比较采用秩和检验,将骨板厚度是否为“高危险型”作为结果变量,利用logistic回归对相关因素进行分析。结果: 第三磨牙牙根中点处的舌侧骨板相对最薄;多根牙、近中倾斜及远中倾斜、Ⅱ类及Ⅲ类阻生牙牙根中点舌侧骨板更薄（P<0.05);近中及远中倾斜,Ⅱ类及Ⅲ类患牙根尖区舌侧骨板更薄（P<0.05);低位阻生牙中,Ⅲ类患牙易出现牙冠中心位点舌侧骨板变薄（P<0.05)。结论: 舌侧骨板厚度与阻生牙牙根数、倾斜方向、阻生类型有关。在阻生牙拔除术中,应考虑上述因素,警惕舌神经、舌侧骨板及周围软组织损伤。

关键词: CBCT, 舌神经, 舌侧骨板, 下颌阻生第三磨牙, 三维重建

Abstract: PURPOSE: The potential relationship between impacted mandibular third molar and lingual bone thickness was investigated by quantitative measurement of lingual bone thickness, and a three-dimensional visualization model of lingual bone was established. METHODS: Image data of 200 cases of mandibular impacted third molar were collected from the database of Hefei Stomatological Hospital. Thickness measurement and three-dimensional reconstruction of lingual bone at different measurement sites were performed by Simplant Pro software. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 22.0 software package, and the comparison of lingual thickness at different measurement sites was performed using rank sum test. Whether the thickness of bone plate was "high-risk type" was taken as the result variable, different related factors were analyzed by logistic regression. RESULTS: The lingual bone at the middle point of the root of the third molar was the thinnest. Multiple teeth, mesio-inclined and dial-inclined teeth, and Class Ⅱ and Ⅲ impacted teeth had thin lingual bone(P<0.05). The mesial and distal inclines were observed, and the lingual bone was thin in the root apical region of the teeth in Class Ⅱ and Class Ⅲ(P<0.05). In the lower impacted teeth, the thin lingual bone at the central crown site was more likely to be found in Class Ⅲ teeth(P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The thickness of lingual bone was related to the number of impacted tooth roots, tilt direction and impacted type. In the extraction of impacted teeth, the above factors should be considered, and the injury of lingual nerve, lingual bone and surrounding soft tissue should be vigilant.

Key words: CBCT, Lingual nerve, Lingual bone, Impacted mandibular third molar, 3D reconstruction

中图分类号:

R782.1

赵君, 吴晓波, 刘娜, 郝新河. 基于CBCT及三维重建技术对下颌阻生第三磨牙舌侧骨板厚度及形态的研究[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(6): 661-667.

ZHAO Jun, WU Xiao-bo, LIU Na, HAO Xin-he. Study on the thickness and morphology of lingual bone of impacted mandibular third molar based on CBCT and Simplant 3D reconstruction[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2023, 32(6): 661-667.

参考文献

[1] Menziletoglu D, Tassoker M, Kubilay-Isik B, et al.The assesment of relationship between the angulation of impacted mandibular third molar teeth and the thickness of lingual bone: a prospective clinical study[J]. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2018, 24(1): e130-e135.
[2] Queral-Godoy E, Figueiredo R, Valmaseda-Castellón E,et al.Frequency and evolution of lingual nerve lesions following lower third molar extraction[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2006, 64(3): 402-407.
[3] Valmaseda-Castellón E, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C.Lingual nerve damage after third lower molar surgical extraction[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2000, 90(5): 567-573.
[4] Yadav S, Verma A, Sachdeva A.Assessment of lingual nerve injury using different surgical variables for mandibular third molar surgery: a clinical study[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2014, 43(7): 889-893.
[5] Renton T, McGurk M. Evaluation of factors predictive of lingual nerve injury in third molar surgery[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2001, 39(6): 423-428.
[6] Huang IY, Wu CW, Worthington P.The displaced lower third molar: a literature review and suggestions for management[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2007, 65(6): 1186-1190.
[7] Huang IY, Chen CM, Chang SW, et al.Surgical management of accidentally displaced mandibular third molar into the pterygomandibular space: a case report[J]. Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 2007, 23(7): 370-374.
[8] Kiesselbach JE, Chamberlain JG.Clinical and anatomic observations on the relationship of the lingual nerve to the mandibular third molar region[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1984, 42(9): 565-567.
[9] Mendes MB, de Carvalho Leite Leal Nunes CM, de Almeida Lopes MC. Anatomical relationship of lingual nerve to the region of mandibular third molar[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Res, 2014,4(4):e2.
[10] Huang C, Zhou C, Xu M, et al.Risk factors for lingual plate fracture during mandibular third molar extraction[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2020,24(11):4133-4142.
[11] Miloro M, Halkias LE, Slone HW, et al.Assessment of the lingual nerve in the third molar region using magnetic resonance imaging[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg,1997,55(2):134-137.
[12] Wang D, He X, Wang Y, et al.External root resorption of the second molar associated with mesially and horizontally impacted mandibular third molar: evidence from cone beam computed tomography[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2017, 21(4): 1335-1342.
[13] Emes Y, Oncu B, Aybar B, et al.Measurement of the lingual position of the lower third molar roots using cone-beam computed tomography[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2015, 73(1): 13-17.
[14] 黄成, 周淳, 徐珉华, 等. 下颌第三磨牙萌出状态与舌侧骨板厚度的相关性分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(2): 187-191.
[15] Osborn TP, Frederickson G Jr, Small IA, et al.A prospective study of complications related to mandibular third molar surgery[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1985, 43(10): 767-769.
[16] Renton T. Prevention of iatrogenic inferior alveolar nerve injuries in relation to dental procedures[J]. Dent Update, 2010,37(6): 350-352, 354-356, 358-360.
[17] Amin SA, Elsheikh AK, Meyer RA, et al.Incidence of pre-existing lingual cortex perforation before removal of mandibular third molars[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2020, 78(12): 2129-2137.
[18] Tolstunov L, Brickeen M, Kamanin V, et al.Is the angulation of mandibular third molars associated with the thickness of lingual bone?[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2016, 54(8): 914-919.
[19] Momin MA, Matsumoto K, Ejima K, et al.Correlation of mandibular impacted tooth and bone morphology determined by cone beam computed topography on a premise of third molar operation[J]. Surg Radiol Anat, 2013, 35(4): 311-318.
[20] Jerjes W, Upile T, Shah P, et al.Risk factors associated with injury to the inferior alveolar and lingual nerves following third molar surgery-revisited[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2010,109(3): 335-345.
[21] Baqain ZH, Abukaraky A, Hassoneh Y, et al.Lingual nerve morbidity and mandibular third molar surgery: a prospective study[J]. Med Princ Pract, 2010,19(1): 28-32.
[22] Wang D, He X, Wang Y, et al.Topographic relationship between root apex of mesially and horizontally impacted mandibular third molar and lingual plate: cross-sectional analysis using CBCT[J]. Sci Rep, 2016,6: 39268.
[23] Gulicher D, Gerlach KL.Sensory impairment of the lingual and inferior alveolar nerves following removal of impacted mandibular third molars[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2001, 30(4): 306-312.
[24] Lin MH, Mau LP, Cochran DL, et al.Risk assessment of inferior alveolar nerve injury for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a virtual implant placement study[J]. J Dent, 2014, 42(3): 263-270.
[25] Chan HL, Brooks SL, Fu JH, et al.Cross-sectional analysis of the mandibular lingual concavity using cone beam computed tomography[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2011, 22(2): 201-206.

基于CBCT及三维重建技术对下颌阻生第三磨牙舌侧骨板厚度及形态的研究

Study on the thickness and morphology of lingual bone of impacted mandibular third molar based on CBCT and Simplant 3D reconstruction

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张博钧, 崔智铭, 柳稚旭, 陈思悦, 顾恺隽, 李思彤, 吴艳棋, 沈定刚, 朱敏. 基于深度学习牙体分割算法的准确性研究[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(4): 339-344.
[2]	于子航, 段亦格, 崔宇彤, 田玉楼. 不同矢状骨面型均角患者宽度特征分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(3): 312-317.
[3]	李爽, 肖容容, 王明锋. 偏颌患者平面横向倾斜度与颞下颌关节间隙的相关性分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(3): 318-323.
[4]	夏婷婷, 汪涌. 重度牙周炎后牙位点保存术中联合应用浓缩生长因子的疗效评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(6): 650-655.
[5]	鄢洁雅, 林怡君, 李雅欣, 劳安, 廖盛轩, 刘加强. 骨性Ⅲ类错𬌗畸形患者双颌手术后上气道形态变化及相关性分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(5): 485-490.
[6]	唐汝萍, 刘帅, 赵震锦, 汪俊妍. 骨性Ⅲ类下颌偏斜患者颞下颌关节形态位置及上颌骨特征的三维评估[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2023, 32(1): 91-96.
[7]	李怀奇, 叶金海, 王晨星, 朱载瓯, 武和明. 三维重建下3D打印技术在下颌骨缺损修复中的应用评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(3): 283-287.
[8]	冯二玫, 杨剑珍, 张彦霞. TF和S3预备磨牙重度弯曲根管的效果评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(2): 146-149.
[9]	黄成, 周淳, 徐珉华, 邹德荣. 下颌第三磨牙萌出状态与舌侧骨板厚度的相关性分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(2): 187-191.
[10]	王玉俏, 迟敬文, 刘轶凡, 冯枫, 吴慧, 刘文. 成人不同垂直骨面型颧牙槽嵴区骨皮质密度分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(6): 652-656.
[11]	吴雨桐, 孙健, 李亚莉, 陈立强, 陈晨, 邓楠, 李莉, 王志浩. 骨性Ⅲ类错正颌手术前、后面部软、硬组织变化比率的三维研究[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(2): 158-164.
[12]	吴幸晨, 李颖, 赵隽隽. 冠根分次去除法在疑或累及下牙槽神经的下颌第三阻生磨牙拔除术中的应用[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(1): 85-88.
[13]	夏松，戴红卫，张翼，王超，邱靓星，王华桥. 高位头帽-口外弓肌激动器治疗Ⅱ类高角儿童患者前、后的上气道变化[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(3): 270-274.
[14]	李骏, 潘乙怀, 赵瑜, 李玲. 锥形束CT对下颌前磨牙髓腔三维重建的精度分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(2): 146-149.
[15]	冯耀浦, 乔敏, 周洪, 张艳宁, 司新芹. 基于二维DR的颅面硬组织与软组织拟合的研究[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2017, 26(1): 59-63.