Study of angle between maxillary incisor and alveolar bone using cone-beam CT DONG

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2017.04.022

Abstract

Abstract: To measure the angle between maxillary incisor and alveolar bone by the use of cone-beam CT (CBCT), in order to assess preoperative risks and provide guidance in anterior dental implantation. METHODS: A total of 374 patients were included and divided into 3 age groups: group 1 (18-34 years), group 2 (35-59 years) and group 3(above 60 years). All patients underwent CBCT preoperatively, the angle between maxillary incisor and alveolar bone was measured though Kavo eXam Vision software. The data were analyzed with SPSS16.0 software package for Student′s t test. RESULTS: In group 1, 2 and 3, the angle between maxillary incisor and alveolar bone was (13.81±4.37)°, In group 2, the ankle between maxillary incisor and alveolar bone was (15.19±5.23)°, (18.51±6.62)°, respectively; there was no significant difference between male and female in each group, but there was significant difference between every 2 age groups in the angle between maxillary incisor and alveolar bone. CONCLUSIONS: The angle between maxillary incisor and alveolar bone is increasing with the increase of age, but no significant difference between male and female is detected. For patients with dental implantation in anterior area, CBCT should be taken to measure the angle between maxillary incisor and alveolar bone for aesthetic assessment, especially for old patients.

Key words: Aesthetic prosthodontics, Cone-beam CT, Dental implant, Alveolar bone

CLC Number:

R782.1

Zheng-jie, XU Kan. Study of angle between maxillary incisor and alveolar bone using cone-beam CT DONG[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2017, 26(4): 458-460.

References

[1] Papaspyridakos P, Chen CJ, Singh M, et al. Success criteria in implant dentistry: a systematic review [J].J Dent Res, 2012, 91(3): 242-248.
[2] Chen ST, Buser D. Esthetic outcomes following immediate and early implant placement in the anterior maxilla-a systematic review [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2014, 29(Suppl): 186-215.
[3] 刘文芳, 范挽亭, 何姗丹, 等. 单颗上颌前牙即刻种植即刻修复后美学评价和患者满意度调查 [J]. 口腔医学研究, 2015, 31(4): 397-400.
[4] 李雪, 彭友俭. 成人前牙区黑三角病因的探讨 [J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2014, 41(5): 567-570.
[5] 杨瑞, 何家才. 上颌前牙区骨量不足种植修复的美学观察 [J]. 中国美容医学, 2013, 22(9): 932-935.
[6] 邸萍, 林野, 罗佳. 上颌前牙单牙种植修复中过渡义齿对软组织成型作用的临床研究[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2012, 44(1): 59-64.
[7] 潘在兴, 陈小华, 叶起清, 等. 上颌前牙种植体周围牙龈乳头重建的临床研究 [J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2008, 13(3): 114-117.
[8] 吴康, 赵保东, 王国栋, 等. 牙龈诱导在上颌前牙种植美学修复中的临床应用 [J]. 中国美容医学, 2014, 20(7): 573-575.
[9] 胡秀莲, 林野, 于海燕, 等. 种植暂时修复体在上颌前牙种植美学修复中软组织处理技术 [J]. 中国口腔种植学杂志, 2012, 17(1): 18-20.
[10] Kuchler U, von Arx T. Horizontal ridge augmentation in conjunction with or prior to implant placement in the anterior maxilla: a systematic review [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2014, 29(Suppl): 14-24.
[11] Levine RA, Huynh-Ba G, Cochran DL. Soft tissue augmentation procedures for mucogingival defects in esthetic sites[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2014, 29 (Suppl): 155-185.
[12] Martin WC, Pollini A, Morton D. The influence of restorative procedures on esthetic outcomes in implant dentistry: a systematic review [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2014, 29 (Suppl): 142-154.
[13] Cosyn J, Hooghe N, De Bruyn H. A systematic review on the frequency of advanced recession following single immediate implant treatment [J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2012, 39(6): 582-589.
[14] Lin GH, Chan HL, Wang HL. Effects of currently available surgical and restorative interventions on reducing midfacial mucosal recession of immediately placed single-tooth implants: a systematic review [J].J Periodontol, 2014, 85(1): 92-102.
[15] Slagter KW, den Hartog L, Bakker NA, et al. Immediate placement of dental implants in the esthetic zone: a systematic review and pooled analysis [J]. J Periodontol, 2014, 85(7): e241-250.