外力方向对防护牙托性能影响的有限元分析

doi:10.19439/j.sjos.2018.06.003

上海口腔医学 ›› 2018, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 574-578.doi: 10.19439/j.sjos.2018.06.003

外力方向对防护牙托性能影响的有限元分析

朱远兵, 赖光云, 汪俊

上海交通大学医学院附属第九人民医院·口腔医学院儿童口腔科,国家口腔疾病临床研究中心, 上海市口腔医学重点实验室,上海市口腔医学研究所,上海 200011

收稿日期:2018-10-09 出版日期:2018-12-25 发布日期:2019-01-11
通讯作者: 汪俊,E-mail：wangjun202@126.com
作者简介:朱远兵(1990-),男,硕士,住院医师,E-mail：649594283@qq.com

Effect of impact direction on the cushion property of mouthguards: a finite element analysis

ZHU Yuan-bing, LAI Guang-yun, WANG Jun

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine; National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology and Shanghai Research Institute of Stomatology. Shanghai 200011, China

Received:2018-10-09 Online:2018-12-25 Published:2019-01-11
Supported by:
国家重点研发计划(2017YFC0840100,2017YFC0840110)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的: 运用有限元分析评估外力方向对牙托缓冲能力的影响。方法: 采集仿真模型锥形束CT（CBCT）影像资料,利用MIMICS软件建立分析模型。运用ABAQUS软件模拟研究在牙托厚度不同的情况下（分别为0、1.5、3、4.5和6 mm）,经不同方向外力（撞击方向与牙长轴交角分别为30°、60°、90°和120°）撞击后,牙体表面的应力变化情况,进而评价牙托的缓冲能力。结果: 在研究实验条件下,当牙托厚度较薄时（1.5 mm和3 mm）,与其他方向相比,牙托缓冲效率在60°交角时最低,在120°交角时最高。而在牙托厚度增加后（4.5 mm和6 mm）,牙托缓冲效率在90°交角时最低,在30°交角时最高。外力方向不同时,牙托的应力缓冲效率随着牙托厚度的增加而提高。结论: 外力方向对防护牙托的缓冲能力有一定影响,但其易受牙托厚度的影响。

关键词: 防护牙托, 牙外伤, 有限元分析

Abstract: PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cushion property of mouthguards when the impact object came from different directions. METHODS: A 3D finite element model of upper central incisor, periodontal ligament and alveolar bone was developed based on cone-beam CT (CBCT) images of a plastic teeth model. The mouthguards were modeled in 5 different thickness (T: 0, 1.5, 3, 4.5 and 6 mm) and a nonlinear dynamic impact analysis, in which the finite element models were collided by a steel ball from different directions (D: angles between the impact direction and the long axis of tooth were 30°, 60°, 90°, 120°, respectively), was performed. The stress cushion efficiency was calculated. RESULTS: The stress cushion efficiency of the mouthguards varied with different thicknesses and impact directions. When T=1.5 mm and 3 mm, the stress cushion efficiency was minimal as D=60° and maximal as D=120°. However, when T=4.5 mm and 6 mm, the stress cushion efficiency was minimal as D=90° and maximal as D=30°. Moreover, the stress cushion efficiency of mouthguards improved with the increasing thickness in each impact direction. CONCLUSIONS: The impact direction affects the stress cushion efficiency of mouthguards, which however is influenced by the thickness of mouthguards.

Key words: Mouthguard, Dental trauma, Finite element analysis

中图分类号:

R788.4

朱远兵, 赖光云, 汪俊. 外力方向对防护牙托性能影响的有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(6): 574-578.

ZHU Yuan-bing, LAI Guang-yun, WANG Jun. Effect of impact direction on the cushion property of mouthguards: a finite element analysis[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2018, 27(6): 574-578.

参考文献

[1] Andreasen JQ, Ravn JJ.Epidemiology of traumatic dental injuries to primary and permanent teeth in a Danish population sample[J]. Int J Oral Surg, 1972, 1(5): 235-239.
[2] 王楠, 龚怡. 急性牙外伤在儿童及青少年中的流行与分布特点[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2010, 19(7): 757-760.
[3] Flores MT, Andreasen JO, Bakland LK, et al.Guidelines for the evaluation and management of traumatic dental injuries[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2010, 17(4): 145-148.
[4] 杨伟湘, 李彦. 运动护齿器的应用现状及研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2013, 40(4): 486-488.
[5] Verissimo C, Costa PV, Santosfilho PC, et al.Custom-Fitted EVA Mouthguards: what is the ideal thickness? a dynamic finite element impact study[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2016, 32(2): 95-102.
[6] Grewal N, Kumari F, Tiwari U.Comparative evaluation of shock absorption ability of custom-fit mouthguards with new-generation polyolefin self-adapting mouthguards in three different maxillary anterior teeth alignments using Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) sensors[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2015, 31(4): 294-301.
[7] Bhalla A, Grewal N, Tiwari U, et al.Shock absorption ability of laminate mouth guards in two different malocclusions using fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensor[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2013, 29(3): 218-225.
[8] Ho SP, Goodis H, Balooch M, et al.The effect of sample preparation technique on determination of structure and nanomechanical properties of human cementum hard tissue[J]. Biomaterials, 2004, 25(19): 4847-4857.
[9] 翁维民, 李玲, 张富强, 等. 不同材料桩核冠系统修复上中切牙后的三维有限元分析[J]. 口腔材料器械杂志, 2004, 13(2): 79-82.
[10] Verissimo C, Santosfilho PC, Tantbirojn D, et al.Modifying the biomechanical response of mouthguards with hard inserts: A finite element study[J]. Am J Dent, 2015, 28(2): 116-120.
[11] Chowdhury RU, Churei H, Takahashi H, et al.Combined analysis of shock absorption capability and force dispersion effect of mouthguard materials with different impact objects[J]. Dent Mater J, 2014, 33(4): 551-556.
[12] Takeda T, Ishigami K, Jun H, et al.The influence of the sensor type on the measured impact absorption of mouthguard material[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2004, 20(1): 29-35.
[13] 黄翀. 数字动态应变仪的研究与设计[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2006.
[14] 黄宇文. 有限元分析在口腔生物力学中的应用[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2012, 16(13): 2423-2426.
[15] 孙力, 李鸿波, 储冰峰. 牙颌三维有限元建模方法的研究进展[J]. 口腔颌面修复学杂志, 2010, 11(1): 52-54.
[16] 马宏伟. 上颌第一前磨牙楔状缺损的病因研究及充填治疗的生物力学分析 [D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2010.
[17] Bochnig MS, Oh MJ, Nagel T, et al.Comparison of the shock absorption capacities of different mouthguards[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2017, 33(3): 205-213.
[18] Duddy FA, Weissman J, Lee RA Sr, et al.Influence of different types of mouthguards on strength and performance of collegiate athletes: a controlled-randomized trial[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2012, 28(4): 263-267.

外力方向对防护牙托性能影响的有限元分析

Effect of impact direction on the cushion property of mouthguards: a finite element analysis

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈精诚, 赵梦丽, 程志恒, 刘昕. 隐形矫治器上前牙内收过程中侧切牙不同附件设计的三维有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(4): 360-366.
[2]	韩祥永, 鞠雅琼, 张琳琳, 田芝娟. 聚醚醚酮用于上颌牙列缺失种植固定修复桥架的三维有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2024, 33(4): 367-372.
[3]	毛懿, 陈旭卓, 覃海艺, 甄锦泽, 邱亚汀, 霍亮, 张善勇. 双侧冠突切除对肋骨-肋软骨移植重建颞下颌关节受力影响的有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2022, 31(2): 126-131.
[4]	高远, 陈杰, 王高琦, 李云凯, 卞翠荣. 种植体-基台连接设计对基台与基台螺丝受力影响的三维有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(5): 481-487.
[5]	杨立, 冉幸, 李岩. 上海市普陀区小学教师儿童牙外伤知识知晓度抽样调查[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(4): 435-438.
[6]	盛恺, 赖光云, 赵是民. 45例57颗乳牙外伤性侧方移位的短期预后观察[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2021, 30(1): 100-103.
[7]	邱晓键, 肖善社, 谷雪莲, 朱来宽, 蒋倩. 不同锥度根管锉对根管壁抗折强度的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(5): 471-475.
[8]	左书玉, 王璇, 吴海威, 张东升. 不同种植体外形设计对上颌窦提升术后种植体周围应力分布的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(4): 355-358.
[9]	韩婧, 解东平, 王慧珊, 周子疌, 刘剑楠. 微型钛板与生物可吸收板在下颌骨骨切开术固定中的应力比较[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2020, 29(3): 237-241.
[10]	王诗哲, 潘晓岗, 周可拓. 拔牙病例隐形矫治器设计的有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2019, 28(3): 264-267.
[11]	顾美珍, 徐宏鸣, 陈芳, 李晓艳, 蒋钰钢, 李克勇. 不完全腭裂咽腔三维有限元模型的建立[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2018, 27(6): 591-595.
[12]	何淞，陈周艳，杨四维，黄跃. 唇舌侧弓丝力学性能差异的三维有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2015, 24(6): 660-666.
[13]	董晶,张哲湛,周国良. 上颌第一磨牙远中移动时牙周膜应力分布的非线性三维有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2015, 24(3): 315-320.
[14]	韩丽会,邱晓霞,邢旭娜,蔡留意. 上颌前牙区种植方案中角度设计的三维有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2015, 24(2): 157-163.
[15]	张珑,逯宜,杨柏松,郭妍,李芳萍. 不同大小MO洞型复合树脂嵌体修复应力分布的有限元分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2015, 24(2): 170-176.