前牙美学区种植义齿个体化修复及临床评价

上海口腔医学 ›› 2014, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (4): 446-451.

前牙美学区种植义齿个体化修复及临床评价

戴文雍¹, 周国兴^{1, 2}, 张晓真¹, 赵毅¹, 王洁^{1, 2}, 杨益^{1, 2}, 朱志军^{1, 2}, 汤春波^{1, 2}

1.南京医科大学口腔医学研究所,江苏南京 210029;
2.南京医科大学附属口腔医院种植修复科,江苏南京 210029

收稿日期:2013-09-22 出版日期:2014-08-20 发布日期:2014-10-20
通讯作者: 汤春波,Tel: 025-85031834,E-mail: cbtang@njmu.edu.cn
作者简介:戴文雍(1988-), 女, 在读七年制研究生, E-mail:katherineday47@hotmail.com
基金资助:
江苏省卫生厅科技项目(H201034); “江苏省六大人才”高峰项目(2010-WS081); 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(2014-37); 江苏省科技支撑计划资助项目(BE2011778)

Individualized restorative designs and clinical evaluation for dental implants in the anterior esthetic zone with inappropriate conditions

DAI Wen-yong¹, ZHOU Guo-xing^1,2, ZHANG Xiao-zhen¹, ZHAO Yi¹, WANG Jie^1,2, YANG Yi^1,2, ZHU Zhi-jun^1,2, TANG Chun-bo^1,2

1.Institute of Stomatology, Nanjing Medical University. Nanjing 210029;
2. Department of Dental Implantology, Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu Province, China

Received:2013-09-22 Online:2014-08-20 Published:2014-10-20
Supported by:
Supported by Medical Science Foundation of Health Department (H201034), Six Talent Summit Foundation of Jiangsu Province (2010-WS081), Project Funded by Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (2014-37) and Science and Technology Supporting Program of Jiangsu Province (BE2011778).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的:针对前牙美学区牙列缺损且修复条件异常的患者,选取不同修复方案进行个体化修复并评价其临床效果。方法:依据纳入标准,选取接受种植修复治疗并完成前牙美学区个体化修复的患者46例、共58颗种植修复体作为研究对象,随访3～24个月,观察临床效果并利用前牙区红白美学指标给予评分。结果:研究对象年龄18～69岁,平均随访期12.6个月。所有植体均获得良好骨结合,未见植体失败或种植体周围炎病例。依据红白美学标准评估3个月时种植修复体,红色美学低分段者占1.72%,中分段者占44.83%,高分段者占53.45%;白色美学低分段者占0%,中分段者占20.69%,高分段者占79.31%。结论:前牙美学区个体化修复方案可有效改善缺牙患者的外观,及时复诊随访和口腔卫生维护有利于避免种植体及修复体并发症,长期效果有待观察。

关键词: 种植牙, 美学区, 修复设计, 个体化

Abstract: PURPOSE: To offer individualized restorative strategies for patients receiving dental implants in the anterior esthetic zone but with inappropriate available conditions and evaluate the clinical outcomes. METHODS: Forty-six patients with 58 implants were recruited for the study in accordance with the criteria and received individualized implant prostheses in the anterior esthetic zone. The patients were followed up for 3-24 months, and the clinical outcomes were evaluated by pink and white esthetic scores (PES/WES). RESULTS: The patients were from 18 to 69 years old, and followed up for 12.6 months in average. According to the third month follow-up esthetic scores, for PES, 1.72% of the patients got low scores, 44.83% got medium scores and 53.45% got high scores; For WES, 0% got low scores, 20.69% got medium scores and 79.31% got high scores. No implant failure or peri-implantitis occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Individualized restorative designs for implants in the esthetic zone can effectively improve the appearance of the prostheses which originally have no appropriate available space. Close follow-up and monitoring of the peri-implant soft tissue and proper oral hygiene instructions are important to ensure the conditions of the prostheses.

Key words: Dental implant, Esthetic zone, Prosthesis design, Individualization

中图分类号:

R783.2

戴文雍, 周国兴, 张晓真, 赵毅, 王洁, 杨益, 朱志军, 汤春波. 前牙美学区种植义齿个体化修复及临床评价[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2014, 23(4): 446-451.

DAI Wen-yong, ZHOU Guo-xing, ZHANG Xiao-zhen, ZHAO Yi, WANG Jie, YANG Yi, ZHU Zhi-jun, TANG Chun-bo. Individualized restorative designs and clinical evaluation for dental implants in the anterior esthetic zone with inappropriate conditions[J]. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2014, 23(4): 446-451.

参考文献

[1] 宿玉成.美学区种植修复的评价和临床程序[J].口腔医学研究,2008,24(3):241-244.
[2] Kamalakidis S, Paniz G, Kang KH, et al. Nonsurgical management of soft tissue deficiencies for anterior single implant-supported restorations: a clinical report[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2007, 97(1): 1-5.
[3] Belser UC, Grütter L, Vailati F, et al. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores [J]. J Periodontol, 2009, 80(1): 140-151.
[4] Higginbottom FL. Implants as an option in the esthetic zone [J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2005, 63(9 Suppl 2): 33-44.
[5] Holst S, Hegenbarth EA, Schlegel KA, et al. Restoration of a nonrestorable central incisor using forced orthodontic eruption, immediate implant placement, and an all-ceramic restoration: a clinical report [J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2007, 98(4): 251-255.
[6] Sammartino G, Marenzi G, di Lauro AE, et al. Aesthetics in oral implantology: biological, clinical, surgical, and prosthetic aspects [J]. Implant Dent, 2007, 16(1): 54-65.
[7] 王春晶, 傅其宏. 前牙种植义齿修复美学效果评价及其影响因素分析 [J]. 口腔医学, 2013, 33(2): 116-118.
[8] 周仲豪,莫嘉骥,姒蜜思,等.上前牙区单个种植牙牙龈生物学类型对龈乳头重建的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学,2012,21(5): 541-545.
[9] 邱立新. 种植美学修复的现状与问题[J]. 中国实用口腔科杂志, 2008, 1(6): 337-339.
[10] den Hartog L, Raghoebar GM, Stellingsma K, et al. Immediate loading and customized restoration of a single implant in the maxillary esthetic zone: a clinical report[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2009, 102(4): 211-215.
[11] Ekfeldt A, Furst B, Carlsson GE. Zirconia abutments for single-tooth implant restorations: a retrospective and clinical follow-up study [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2011, 22(11): 1308-1314.
[12] 戴文雍, 汤春波. 种植体修复个体化基台研究现状及展望 [J]. 口腔医学, 2012, 32(11): 685-687.
[13] Welander M, Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T. The mucosal barrier at implant abutments of different materials [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2008, 19(7): 635-641.
[14] Jung RE, Pjetursson BE, Glauser R, et al. A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns [J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2008, 19(2): 119-130.
[15] Choquet V, Hermans M, Adriaenssens P, et al. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of the papilla level adjacent to single-tooth dental implants. A retrospective study in the maxillary anterior region [J]. J Periodontol, 2001, 72(10): 1364-1371.